Can International Trade Change Minds?

Last registered on May 05, 2017

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Can International Trade Change Minds?
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0002206
Initial registration date
May 05, 2017

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 05, 2017, 8:02 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Columbia University - Graduate School of Business
PI Affiliation
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2010-06-01
End date
2017-04-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Most economists believe that international trade provides economic benefits to both the exporting and importing countries. A large literature characterizes and estimates the welfare gains from trade, and identifies the mechanisms through which trade affects workers, firms and the aggregate economy. Some policymakers believe that international trade has effects beyond changing economic outcomes such as prices, expenditures, wages, employment and productivity. Trade may change individuals’ views and attitudes towards other countries and cultures. For example, individuals who have directly benefited from international trade by selling their production abroad may hold more cosmopolitan views and be more favorable towards the values of their buyers.

Of course, participation in international trade and an individual’s views and attitudes may simply be correlated. It is hard to estimate the causal impact of trade on views and attitudes because of the difficulty of finding a convincing counterfactual since substantial evidence suggests that exporters differ from non-exporters. It is also difficult to estimate this relationship because one needs to complement trade data with surveys on individual attitudes.

We hope to make progress on these issues and provide the first rigorous evidence on how exposure to trade with Western Democracies affects participants’ views and attitudes. We do this by utilizing the randomized allocation of export orders to rug-making firms in Fowa, Egypt, as described in Atkin, Khandelwal and Osman (forthcoming). More than five years after the initial randomization, and three years after our last follow up survey, we re-surveyed producers to collect information on their attitudes and world views. We developed a survey that focused on issues of economic equality, gender equality, information sources and international trade. Most importantly, given the geographic and historical context of our sample, we also asked questions about Western bias and attitudes towards terrorism. Our main hypothesis is that trade with Western democracies decreases anti-Western bias and support for terrorism.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Atkin, David, Amit Khadelwal and Adam Osman. 2017. "Can International Trade Change Minds?." AEA RCT Registry. May 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.2206-1.0
Former Citation
Atkin, David, Amit Khadelwal and Adam Osman. 2017. "Can International Trade Change Minds?." AEA RCT Registry. May 05. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/2206/history/17411
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
This is a new survey implemented on the participants of an early randomized experiment, registered as AEARCTR-0000069. In that experiment we provided a subset of handmade rug manufacturing firms the opportunity to work on orders place by foreign buyers.
Intervention Start Date
2010-06-01
Intervention End Date
2017-04-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Attitudes towards foreign countries and views on terrorism.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experiment is outlined in Atkin, Khandelwal and Osman (QJE, forthcoming). We provided a subset of handmade rug manufacturing firms the opportunity to work on orders place by foreign buyers.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Randomized at the firm level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
219 individual firms
Sample size: planned number of observations
219 individual firms
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
79 treatment firms, 140 control firms.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Columbia
IRB Approval Date
2017-08-01
IRB Approval Number
AAAE9678(M00Y08)
IRB Name
MIT
IRB Approval Date
2016-09-07
IRB Approval Number
1608654627
IRB Name
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
IRB Approval Date
2016-12-07
IRB Approval Number
15383
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Can International Trade Change Minds?

MD5: 369c9724b3366a956b403be297e49521

SHA1: 6b56d406267ccb866604d69810ede99f60825f22

Uploaded At: May 05, 2017

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials