Measuring selection effects on attitudes toward uncertainty: Experimental Evidence

Last registered on April 09, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Measuring selection effects on attitudes toward uncertainty: Experimental Evidence
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0002855
Initial registration date
April 07, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 09, 2018, 11:26 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
April 09, 2018, 4:25 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka-1229, Bangladesh

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
PI Affiliation
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, North South University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2017-06-01
End date
2017-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
In this paper, we address three issues on measuring attitudes toward uncertainty using 206 Bangladeshi farmers in a field experiment. Using a slightly modified version of the original multiple price list (MPL) approach of Holt and Laury (2002), we first measure farmers’ risk and ambiguity aversions when subjects make decision alone. Secondly, for risk experiments only, we investigate the subjects’ attitudes toward uncertainty with different winning probabilities (p=0.3, 0.5, and 0.7) as probabilities of winning are unknown for ambiguity experiments. We conduct each experiment on both gain and loss domains to address the gain-loss asymmetry in attitudes toward uncertainty. Finally, we attempt to investigate the effects of communications on individuals’ attitudes toward uncertainty. In order to do so, we conduct all these variations of experiments allowing farmers to make decisions in groups of three. In order to measure group selection effects on attitudes toward uncertainty we allow fifty percent of the farmers to form groups on their own while we assign the remaining farmers to random peers.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ahsanuzzaman, Ahsanuzzaman, Kanti Ananta Nuzhat and Asad Karim Khan Priyo. 2018. "Measuring selection effects on attitudes toward uncertainty: Experimental Evidence ." AEA RCT Registry. April 09. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.2855-2.0
Former Citation
Ahsanuzzaman, Ahsanuzzaman, Kanti Ananta Nuzhat and Asad Karim Khan Priyo. 2018. "Measuring selection effects on attitudes toward uncertainty: Experimental Evidence ." AEA RCT Registry. April 09. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/2855/history/27833
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2017-06-01
Intervention End Date
2017-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Attitudes toward risk and ambiguity preferences; Insurance uptake
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Using a slightly modified version of the original multiple price list (MPL) approach of Holt and Laury (2002), we first measure farmers’ risk and ambiguity aversions when subjects make decision alone. Secondly, for risk experiments only, we investigate the subjects’ attitudes toward uncertainty with different winning probabilities (p=0.3, 0.5, and 0.7) as probabilities of winning are unknown for ambiguity experiments. We conduct each experiment on both gain and loss domains to address the gain-loss asymmetry in attitudes toward uncertainty. Finally, we attempt to investigate the effects of communications on individuals’ attitudes toward uncertainty. In order to do so, we conduct all these variations of experiments allowing farmers to make decisions in groups of three. In order to measure group selection effects on attitudes toward uncertainty we allow fifty percent of the farmers to form groups on their own while we assign the remaining farmers to random peers.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Public lottery
Randomization Unit
randomization at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2 villages in two upazila (sub-district)
Sample size: planned number of observations
206 farmers and 48 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Half of total samples got group peers selected by themselves while the remaining half got their group peers by random assignment.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials