Networks and Global Health: Experimental Evidence of Women’s Social Networks, Reproductive Health, and Well-Being

Last registered on September 16, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Networks and Global Health: Experimental Evidence of Women’s Social Networks, Reproductive Health, and Well-Being
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0003283
Initial registration date
September 12, 2018

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 16, 2018, 12:24 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
The World Bank

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
PI Affiliation
BOSTON UNIVERSITY
PI Affiliation
DELHI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
PI Affiliation
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2018-06-26
End date
2019-12-15
Secondary IDs
Abstract
We will implement a randomized control trial to explore the causal impact of a social network-based family planning intervention on young women’s contraceptive use, reproductive health, fertility and well-being in rural India. Our proposed intervention consists of a “bring-a-friend” family planning voucher package that exploits young women's social networks to reduce barriers and to improve access to high-quality family planning services. Through this study, we aim to evaluate whether enabling a woman to recruit a friend to accompany her to the clinic leads to a greater shift in family planning practices and attitudes than targeting both of those women individually. Our project aims to identify innovative and cost-effective strategies for delivering reproductive health services through social networks in low-income settings.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
ALMANZA, CATALINA HERRERA et al. 2018. "Networks and Global Health: Experimental Evidence of Women’s Social Networks, Reproductive Health, and Well-Being." AEA RCT Registry. September 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3283-1.0
Former Citation
ALMANZA, CATALINA HERRERA et al. 2018. "Networks and Global Health: Experimental Evidence of Women’s Social Networks, Reproductive Health, and Well-Being." AEA RCT Registry. September 16. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/3283/history/34275
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Women who are administered the baseline surveys will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment arms: 1) a no-voucher group (50%), 2) a solo-voucher group (25%), and 3) a “bring-a-friend” (BAF) group (25%). All participants will receive an information brochure that describes the benefits of family planning, healthy birth spacing, and timing of pregnancy. Women who are randomly assigned to the solo-voucher and BAF groups will also receive a voucher for discounted access to family planning services at a high-quality private clinic. In addition, women who are randomly assigned to the BAF group will be encouraged to bring a friend who may also be, in consultation with a doctor at the FP clinic, eligible to receive the same voucher for family planning as the treated woman.
Intervention Start Date
2018-09-04
Intervention End Date
2018-09-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Attitude/Knowledge of Family Planning, including: knowledge of family planning; knowledge of birth spacing and timing; and perceptions toward contraception (including intentions to use).
2. Contraceptive Use, including: changes in contraceptive prevalence; changes in method mix; and adherence to methods (compliance, discontinuation).
3. Pregnancy and Fertility Outcomes, including: pregnancy status; parity; delivery in a facility; months since last birth; wantedness of last birth; and intentions to become pregnant in future.
4. Social Network Outcomes: including: network formation, peer effects, centrality, etc.
5. Intervention Uptake: use of the voucher, number of peers that were brought to the clinic, etc.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Conducted 2-month long baseline survey among eligible women, where eligible women are those who:
1. are 18-30 year old;
2. are currently married;
3. have at least one child;
4. are not sterilized nor has had a hysterectomy;
5. are neither pregnant nor are more than six months postpartum at the time of the screening; and
6. live in one of the survey sites.

We visited 2,781 household in adjacent villages for the study and found an estimate of 671 households that had at least one woman with these characteristics. We interviewed the youngest woman in case there was more than one eligible woman present in the household at the time of the survey. Data on women’s social networks, background characteristics, reproductive and contraceptive histories, and other information was collected as part of the baseline survey. The field enumerators also distributed, right after the interview, to all participants an information brochure that describes the benefits of family planning, healthy birth spacing, and timing of pregnancy. The information brochure was not accompanied by a counseling session. As part of the baseline survey, we collected identifying information (addresses, phone numbers, household GPS locations, etc.) needed for the follow-up. We also collected photographs of interviewed women to construct a photo album that will be used to validate mentioned network ties.

Next, we randomized the sample of eligible women into the three treatment arms. Doing the randomization after the baseline survey allowed us to balance on baseline covariates.

Following randomization, women who are assigned to the voucher and BAF arms will receive a visit from a field worker, who will inform them about the services that are available to them as part of their respective intervention and who will provide them with the voucher for access to family planning at our partner family planning clinic, the ADC Clinic in Chandwak, Jaunpur. Intervention field workers will also be able to use the photo album in order to verify the baseline social network information, particularly, the network ties and alters that were provided by women assigned to the voucher and BAF arms. Women will be able to use the vouchers once we complete the randomization and the photo verification process which we expect to implement within 1 to 2 weeks.

This will be followed by a 10-month-long intervention period during which women who are provided with vouchers may redeem them at the ADC Clinic. During this period, a field manager will monitor and record data on all clinic visits by women in the sample.

Following re-hiring and training of field staff, we will implement a 2-month-long endline survey to capture changes in family planning practices and attitudes.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
We randomized women into intervention and control arms using stratification methods, in which intervention assignment was balanced according to the following baseline characteristics: village, current use of family planning, educational attainment, desire for another child, and number of peers mentioned in our social networks module.
Randomization Unit
Household
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
671 households (one woman per household)
Sample size: planned number of observations
671 households (one woman per household)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Control = 350 women
Solo-voucher Treatment = 156 women
Bring-a-friend Treatment = 165 women
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Please see the attached document for detailed power calculations we conducted before the baseline survey. However, since then, we managed to survey more women than we had planned in our baseline survey.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
The Northeastern University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2018-06-06
IRB Approval Number
18-04-24
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials