Back to History Current Version

Effects of Peer Group Composition in a Post-Secondary Environment

Last registered on December 02, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Effects of Peer Group Composition in a Post-Secondary Environment
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004440
Initial registration date
July 22, 2019

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 24, 2019, 11:45 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
December 02, 2019, 9:29 PM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Chicago

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Loyola Marymount University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2019-08-26
End date
2022-01-01
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Working with peers can be beneficial or harmful for many reasons. This study explores how working in pairs and pair composition (in terms of academic achievement, demographics, and, personality traits) affects students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards group work. Hence, this study will shed line on the mechanisms through which peer effects work.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Beattie, Graham and Fulya Ersoy. 2019. "Effects of Peer Group Composition in a Post-Secondary Environment." AEA RCT Registry. December 02. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4440-1.1
Former Citation
Beattie, Graham and Fulya Ersoy. 2019. "Effects of Peer Group Composition in a Post-Secondary Environment." AEA RCT Registry. December 02. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/4440/history/58117
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2019-08-26
Intervention End Date
2022-01-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
--Exam Scores
--Perceptions about Group Work
--Interest in the economics major
--Trust levels
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
--Quiz Scores/Answers
--College GPA
--Time to Graduation
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This experiment has two treatment arms: Individual Quiz and Group Quiz.
Experimental Design Details
Before each semester starts, students who enrolled for the intermediate microeconomics course take an online test that measures their initial microeconomics knowledge. Then, students receive an online initial survey that measures some personality traits (such as persistence, growth mindset, self-control, etc.) and their attitudes towards group work. Classrooms are randomly assigned to the treatment and the control groups. Each student in the treatment classrooms takes in-class quizzes with another randomly assigned student. The random peer assignment is repeated after every 4 quizzes. Each student in the control classrooms takes in-class quizzes individually. In total, there are 12 quizzes and these quizzes make up 12% of students’ final grades. Quiz questions are similar to the homework questions to give students an incentive to make them work on their homework together. At the end of the semester, students complete an end survey that measures their attitudes towards group work. This survey will also ask them questions about their interactions with their assigned partners outside of the classroom.
Randomization Method
Each semester, one professor will teach one section whereas the other professor will teach two sections. The section of the professor who teaches only one section will be the Group Quiz section. One of the sections of the professor who teaches two sections will be randomly assigned to be the Individual Quiz section and the other will be the Group Quiz section. The randomization will be done with a coin flip.

In the Group Quiz sections, students are randomly assigned to their partners by a computer and this is repeated after every 4 quizzes.
Randomization Unit
Randomization for the treatment is done at the classroom level.
Individuals in the group quiz classrooms are further randomly assigned to their peers.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
12 classrooms
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 250 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
4 control classrooms (80 students) where students will take individual quizzes.
8 treatment classrooms (160 students) where students will take quizzes in pairs.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Loyola Marymount University
IRB Approval Date
2019-06-18
IRB Approval Number
LMU IRB 2019 SU 05-R

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials