Personality and Coordination
Last registered on May 30, 2018

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Personality and Coordination
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0002975
Initial registration date
May 29, 2018
Last updated
May 30, 2018 9:59 PM EDT
Location(s)
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
University of Warwick
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
University fo Warwick
Additional Trial Information
Status
In development
Start date
2018-06-11
End date
2018-12-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
The project aims to use experimental evidence to investigate the relationship between personality type, beliefs about others’ type (sometimes called “theory of mind”), similarity and performance in a coordination game. Other tasks include demographic questionnaires, IQ tests, measures of risk and other psychometric tests.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Nazneen, Mahnaz and Daniel Sgroi. 2018. "Personality and Coordination." AEA RCT Registry. May 30. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/2975/history/30169
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Subjects are paired up and asked to make decisions in a one-shot coordination game, where, depending on the treatment, they may or may not get to communicate with their partner.
Intervention Start Date
2018-06-11
Intervention End Date
2018-12-31
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
The experimental data will allow us to check if personality type (and cognitive ability) and beliefs about partner's personality type (and their cognitive ability) correlate with decision-making in the Stage Hunt coordination game, as well as whether similarity between own and partner's personality and cognitive ability matter.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Own personality will be based on scores in the Big Five personality test, belief about partner's personality will be based on (incentivized) questions about how others performed in the personality test, cognitive ability will be measures by a ravens progressive matrices test, beliefs about others cognitive ability will be based on (incentivized) questions about others performance in the Raven's test. Similarity will be measured by comparing beliefs about partners to beliefs about own performance (in the Raven's test) or actual answers to the Big Five personality test.
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
We will also measure risk, gender, mood, empathy and will attempt to derive further measures of personality and mood from text (taken from the descritpions written prior to the game).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Variables constructed from text will include measures such as inward-orientation, valence, concreteness, arousal, dominance and specific word categories. Mood will be taken from a Likert scale included in the final questionnaire, and risk will be take from a Dospert questionnaire.
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
The basic design involves asking subjects to take psycho-metric and personality tests. Depending upon the treatment they may then communicate with each other and are asked to report beliefs about their partners before playing a coordination game and undertaking a final questionnaire.
Experimental Design Details
The design involves asking subjects to take the Big 5 personality test and a short Raven’s Progressive Matrices test for cognitive ability. Subjects are paired with another subject and then (depending upon the treatment) there may be the opportunity for them to communicate via short text messages or not. Subjects are then asked to guess the personality type and other characteristics of their partners (such as their cognitive ability). A coordination game is described. Subjects are asked to guess the likely strategy of their partner in these games and then proceed to play the game with their partners. This is followed by tests for empathy (for instance, they are shown pictures of eyes and asked whether these reveal particular moods (Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y. & Plumb, I., 2001). The sessions end with a test of risk preferences and some basic demographic questions (including life satisfaction/mood and gender).
Randomization Method
Randomization by computer
Randomization Unit
Randomization is at the level of the experimental session
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
No clustering
Sample size: planned number of observations
300-400 subjects
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
150-200 with communication, 150-200 without communication
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
University of Warwick Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2018-05-29
IRB Approval Number
111/17-18
Post-Trial
Post Trial Information
Study Withdrawal
Intervention
Is the intervention completed?
No
Is data collection complete?
Data Publication
Data Publication
Is public data available?
No
Program Files
Program Files
Reports and Papers
Preliminary Reports
Relevant Papers