x

NEW UPDATE: Completed trials may now upload and register supplementary documents (e.g. null results reports, populated pre-analysis plans, or post-trial results reports) in the Post Trial section under Reports, Papers, & Other Materials.
Do Think Twice, it´s All Right: Effects and Mechanisms of Tax Enforcement Policies
Last registered on October 04, 2019

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Do Think Twice, it´s All Right: Effects and Mechanisms of Tax Enforcement Policies
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0004817
Initial registration date
October 03, 2019
Last updated
October 04, 2019 11:41 AM EDT
Location(s)

This section is unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
University of Oslo
Other Primary Investigator(s)
Additional Trial Information
Status
On going
Start date
2018-05-15
End date
2022-08-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
We compare the tax compliance effects of two different tax enforcement policies, a relatively costly desk/correspondence audit and a cheap information treatment with a letter asking filers with “risky” filing behavior to take a second look at their tax returns. To assess the total effect of these enforcement policies, we need to take account of both their immediate effects and their long term effects on future filing behaviour. Audits will detect and correct non-compliance on the spot, but may also change subsequent filing behavior. A letter will not disclose non-compliance, but (some) taxpayers may adjust their filings. A letter may also have long term effects on tax compliance. Based on the short run effects of both treatments, which are easy to measure, we describe how we will test the behavioural effects on future filing. We describe the intervention and lay out some important decisions with respect to coding of variables, definitions of samples and the empirical strategy we will apply.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
Kotsadam, Andreas. 2019. "Do Think Twice, it´s All Right: Effects and Mechanisms of Tax Enforcement Policies." AEA RCT Registry. October 04. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.4817-1.0.
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
We work together with the Norwegian National Tax Authorities to compare the effectiveness of these two enforcement policies; a desk based correspondence audit and a “take a second look” letter.
Intervention Start Date
2018-05-31
Intervention End Date
2019-09-01
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Claimed deductions for tax year 2018 (in NOK)
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Partner's claimed deductions for the tax year 2018 (in NOK) and Subjective Detection Risk
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
Randomly assigned audits and letters
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
In office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
12,495 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
12,495 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
12,495 individuals
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
MDE for the main outcome after multiple testing adjustment with 80 % power and a 5 % significance level: 0.07 standard deviations
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

There are documents in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access to this information.

Request Information