Strengthening exercises for the cervical extensors can help restore physiological lordosis and reduce neck pain

Last registered on January 27, 2016

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Strengthening exercises for the cervical extensors can help restore physiological lordosis and reduce neck pain
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0001013
Initial registration date
January 27, 2016

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 27, 2016, 7:44 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2014-03-18
End date
2015-08-07
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine whether cervical extension strengthening will improve physiological curvature of the cervical spine and neck pain severity.
Methods: This was a three-month, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled study with two mea¬surement points (baseline and three month). Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. All patients were given etodolac (600 mg/day for 10 days). The control group received no additional treatment, while the intervention group received additional therapy as a home exercise program consisted of isometric neck extension strengthening forthree months. In both groups, the neck pain severity during rest was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained at the time of admission and then at three months interval. The posterior tangent technique was used in evaluation of cervical lordosis. In accordance with this technique, the angle between the posterior walls of the vertebral bodies C2 and C7, which is called the total curvature of the cervical spine, was measured. As defined in the litearure, we considered loss of cervical lordosis or straight for the total curvature as +4º to -4º,and lordotic and kyphotic as <-4 and >+4, respectively.
Results: There were no significant differences in participants’ age, gender, height, weight or pain duration between two groups (p>0.05). At baseline, there was no difference in cervical lordosis angle or neck pain intensity between groups (p>0.05).
Compared with baseline at 3-month follow-up, cervical lordosis angle was significantly improved in the exercise group (P=0.000) but not in the control (P=0.371). Also, the exercisegroup was significantly superior than the control group considering the change data from baseline to month 3 in cervical lordosis angle (p=0.000). Similarly, considering the number of patients in whom cervical lordosis angle returned to normal, the exercise group was significantly superior than the control group (p=0.000).
At 3-month follow-up, the pain intensity was significantly reduced in both groups compared with baseline (all P=0.000). Nevertheless, consid¬ering the change data from baseline to month 3, there was significant difference between two groups in the pain intensity (P=0.000).
Conclusion: Strengthening exercises for the cervical extensors can help restore physiological lordosis and reduce neck pain.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
ALPAYCI, MAHMUT. 2016. "Strengthening exercises for the cervical extensors can help restore physiological lordosis and reduce neck pain." AEA RCT Registry. January 27. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.1013-1.0
Former Citation
ALPAYCI, MAHMUT. 2016. "Strengthening exercises for the cervical extensors can help restore physiological lordosis and reduce neck pain." AEA RCT Registry. January 27. https://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/1013/history/6633
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2014-04-22
Intervention End Date
2015-08-05

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
In both groups, the neck pain severity during rest was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Radiographs of the cervical spine were obtained at the time of admission and then at three months interval. The posterior tangent technique was used in evaluation of cervical lordosis. In accordance with this technique, the angle between the posterior walls of the vertebral bodies C2 and C7, which is called the total curvature of the cervical spine, was measured. As defined in the litearure, we considered loss of cervical lordosis or straight for the total curvature as +4º to -4º,and lordotic and kyphotic as <-4 and >+4, respectively.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This was a three-month, prospective, observer-blinded, randomized controlled study with two mea-surement points (baseline and three month). Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. All patients were given etodolac (600 mg/day for 10 days). The control group received no additional treatment, while the intervention group received additional therapy as a home exercise program consisted of isometric neck extension strengthening forthree months.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
draw
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
>30 control and >30 treatment groups
Sample size: planned number of observations
85 cervical spine
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
31 control and 34 treatment groups
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Yuzuncu Yil University
IRB Approval Date
2014-04-18
IRB Approval Number
18.04.2014/07

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials