Ask avoidance in Armenia: a field experiment.

Last registered on October 05, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Ask avoidance in Armenia: a field experiment.
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0010140
Initial registration date
October 04, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 05, 2022, 9:59 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
WU Vienna & Masaryk University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
WU Vienna & Masaryk University
PI Affiliation
Cardiff University& Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
PI Affiliation
Ca’Foscacri University of Venice
PI Affiliation
Cardiff University, Masaryk University & IZA

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2022-10-05
End date
2023-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This experiment studies ask avoidance - the phenomenon that individuals often avoid those who solicit donations - in Armenia. We cooperate with a local NGO/Foundation operating nationwide and exploit a unique framework. Our interventions are embedded in a fundraising campaign and implemented via text messages.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Abraham, Diya et al. 2022. "Ask avoidance in Armenia: a field experiment.." AEA RCT Registry. October 05. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.10140-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention will be implemented via targeted text messages.
Intervention Start Date
2022-10-05
Intervention End Date
2023-03-05

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Unsubscription rate; donation amount; donate rate.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
None of the variables will be constructed. All variables are readily available.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will communicate with an NGO/Foundation and a leading marketing, e-commerce company in Armenia. A sample of individuals will be randomized into different arms and receive different donation appeals depending on the trial arm.
Experimental Design Details
Experimental Design

We will closely collaborate with two organizations in Armenia: 1000+ foundation and Nikita mobile (www.nikita.am). Since Nikita mobile has a rich database of individuals with their contact details, the database of potential donors will be borrowed from this company. The database includes the mobile phone number of the potential donors and their gender. Unfortunately, the database does not include any other information, such as the donation history of individuals. Thus, we do not know whether these individuals donated to 1000+ foundation before or not.
The intervention will be implemented via targeted text messages and will last for 6 months. Each text message in the experiment will contain:
• A donation request. Depending on the treatment, we will have either an altruistic, or a reciprocal, or an ordinary request.
• A short link to the 1000+ webpage to make the donation. Each individual will receive a trackable individual link through which we can check whether she clicked on the link or not, made a donation or not, and how much money she donated.
• Instructions how to unsubscribe from the messaging campaign. To unsubscribe the individual will need to send STOP to the short number indicated in the text message. To make sure that this message is not case sensitive, the system is instructed to recognize the following words “STOP”, “Stop”, “stop” in English, Russian, and Armenian language (i.e., ՍՏՈՊ, Ստոպ, ստոպ, СТОП, Стоп, стоп, STOP, Stop, stop).

25,600 individuals will be randomly sampled from the database of Nikita mobile and randomized into 6 arms:
- Donation appeal 1 - Low Frequency Ordinary Message [N=4,266]: We send a quarterly neutral solicitation message. This is the control group.
- Donation appeal 2 - High Frequency Ordinary Message [N=4266]: We send a monthly neutral solicitation message (e.g., Please make a donation to 1000+).
- Donation appeal 3 - Low Frequency Reciprocity Message [N=4,268]: We send a quarterly message involving a strong reciprocity component asking to donate.
- Donation appeal 4 - High Frequency Reciprocity Message [N=4,266]: We send a monthly message involving a strong reciprocity component, asking to donate.
- Donation appeal 5 - Low Frequency Altruism Message [N=4,266]: We send a quarterly message involving a strong altruism component, asking to donate.
- Donation appeal 6 - High Frequency Altruism Message [N=4,268]: We send a monthly message involving a strong altruism component, asking to donate.

All the messages will be sent on the same day in batches to make sure that the unusually high traffic does not overload the web-page of 1000+ foundation in the highly unlikely case if everyone who receives the message taps on the link (the probability of a webpage crash is tiny even in this case, however we opt for a safe option). There will be a gap of 10-20 minutes between the dispatch of each batch. The phone numbers of each treatment are randomly allocated to batches and in each batch there are equal number of observations from each treatment.

Frequent monthly messages are sent in an interval of roughly 30 days. We do not send the messages on a given date in each month to exclude anticipation by the recipients. This design choice is motivated by a recent theoretical literature about anticipated and unanticipated reminders (Ericson, 2017), since surprise reminders/messages can be more effective than anticipated ones. In our view, sending the frequent messages on exactly the same day each month can undermine their effectiveness and somewhat reduce the “surprise effect” of these text messages. In other words, the main aim of this design choice is to make the frequent text messages less anticipated.

We investigate the following hypotheses:

H1: The presence and content of the message (reciprocity/ altruism) affect the unsubscription rate, the donation rate and the amount donated.
H2: The frequency of communication affects the unsubscription rate, the donation rate and the amount donated.
We will also explore how the frequency of communication interacts with the presence and content of the message.
Randomization Method
Randomization done in STATA.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
There are no clusters.
Sample size: planned number of observations
25 600 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
- Donation appeal 1 [N=4,266]
- Donation appeal 2 [N=4266]
- Donation appeal 3 [N=4,268]
- Donation appeal 4 [N=4,266]
- Donation appeal 5 [N=4,266]
- Donation appeal 6 [N=4,268]
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Cardiff University, School Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2022-02-11
IRB Approval Number
655

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials