Increasing Sales by Promoting the Attributes of Pecan through a Systematic Science-Based Marketing Strategy

Last registered on January 31, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Increasing Sales by Promoting the Attributes of Pecan through a Systematic Science-Based Marketing Strategy
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0010789
Initial registration date
January 26, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 31, 2023, 12:04 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
TAMU

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-01-27
End date
2023-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Promoting health benefits and the taste of pecans could effectively increase purchase intention and willingness to pay (Robinson, 2020). However, a consumer generally faces tradeoffs between the healthiness and tastiness of food, which are linked to neurobiological processes underpinning food choice and control of eating behaviors (Lowe and Butryn, 2007). Taste, in particular, can be an essential demand determinant; however, it can contradict a person’s need for a healthy diet (Lowe and Butryn, 2007), especially among consumers of value-added products (Campbell and Shonkwiler, 2020). At the same time, health information could serve as a cue for low taste and high price (Jo and Lusk, 2018). Communicating the appropriate marketing information is essential for increasing producer and consumer welfare. That is, highlighting the “appropriate” attributes of foods may decrease the perceived tension between taste and health or clarify the common lay belief that “unhealthy food has a better taste.” The main goal is to quantify the potential economic benefits for producers and consumers of promoting evidence-based health benefits and taste-related attributes of pecans using two similar non-hypothetical incentive-compative elicitation methods. The results of our study will serve as a basis to (1) identify promotion and marketing practices in the pecan industry, which will have the potential to be expanded to the entire specialty crop industry, (2) determine whether experts have accurate information on consumers preferences, and (3) provide a better understanding of the role of elicitation methods on consumer and producer valuation
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Chomali, Laura , Grace Melo and Marco Palma. 2023. "Increasing Sales by Promoting the Attributes of Pecan through a Systematic Science-Based Marketing Strategy." AEA RCT Registry. January 31. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.10789-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)

We will conduct two experimental studies using different marketing messages (information treatments). The
information treatments will be employed in two economic experiments: (1) an online survey with consumers
and (2) an online survey with experts.
Intervention Start Date
2023-02-03
Intervention End Date
2023-03-24

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
willingness to pay
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
consumer's valuation will be captured in each market scenario

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
experts (economits and producers) best guess about consumer value
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
producer guess of consumer's willingness to pay in each market scenario.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design

Experimental design for consumer valuation
The information treatments are employed in an online survey with consumers using a between-subject design. We will also employ two similar non-hypothetical incentive-compatible elicitation methods, only differing by the way the market price is set in a within-subject design: (1) an auction-like and (2) a seller fixed price.
For method (1), we conduct an auction-like method to estimate the maximum Willingness to Pay (WTP) for 8 oz pecan product. This method is the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM), developed by Becker, et al. (1964) and widely used in experimental economics for understanding the process behind economic choice (Shogren and Lusk, 2007).
For method (2), we estimate WTP using a similar strategy as method (1). The only difference is consumers are told that the market price in the experiment is determined by actual pecan producers. Previous to the online survey, we asked a group of pecan producers their minimum willingness to accept (WTA) to sell the pecan products. Their WTA is then used as the market price in the consumer study.
In sum, for methods (1) and (2), two prices are involved: the offer price of the buyer and a market fixed price. The fixed price is either randomly drawn in the case of method (1) or determined by producers in the case of method (2). Any trade that takes place is for the fixed price. Thus both methods are non-hypothetical and incentive-compatible.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
randomization done by computer
Randomization Unit
It is at participant level
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
NA
Sample size: planned number of observations
500 consumers (100 in each treatment)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
NA
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
We need at least 63 subjects per treatment for a medium effect size.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
TAMU IRB
IRB Approval Date
2023-01-11
IRB Approval Number
IRB2022-1466M
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information