Why do Governments Implement Inefficient Environmental Policies?

Last registered on February 13, 2023
View Trial History

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Why do Governments Implement Inefficient Environmental Policies?
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0010875
Initial registration date
February 09, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
February 13, 2023, 10:42 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Name
Roee Levy
Affiliation
Yale University
Contact Primary Investigator

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Name
Joseph Shapiro
PI Affiliation
PI Name
Dmitry Taubinsky
PI Affiliation
PI Name
Maximiliano Lauletta
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-03-01
End date
2030-03-01
Keywords
Behavior, Environment & Energy, Finance & Microfinance
Additional Keywords
climate change, cost-effectiveness, economic pass-through
JEL code(s)
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Environmental policies have disparate effects on household well-being, pollution, and other socially important outcomes. This study investigates beliefs about and support for the choice of environmental policies and
policy instruments, considering their objective and subjective properties.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Lauletta, Maximiliano et al. 2023. "Why do Governments Implement Inefficient Environmental Policies?." AEA RCT Registry. February 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.10875-1.0
Sponsors & Partners
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2023-03-01
Intervention End Date
2023-05-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
* Support of different policy instrument
* Perceived effect of different instruments
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We will estimate support based on whether participants say they support a policy, based on the participants' ranking of the policies, and based on the stated environmental goal participants prefer for each policy

We will estimate the effect of each policy instrument on perceived electricity costs and inequality

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will estimate how interventions teaching basic economic principles affect support for different environmental policy instruments.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The randomization is conducted online by Qualtrics. Each participant is assigned to one of two videos with equal probability and assigned to watch the video in the beginning or the end of the survey with equal probability.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Approximately 2000
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 2000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Approximately 500
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
US Berkeley Office for Protection of Human Subjects
IRB Approval Date
2022-10-18
IRB Approval Number
2019-08-12484
Analysis Plan