My opinion, your opinion – Do group perceptions prevent the adoption of sustainable farming practices?

Last registered on May 31, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
My opinion, your opinion – Do group perceptions prevent the adoption of sustainable farming practices?
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011003
Initial registration date
February 26, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 08, 2023, 12:07 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
May 31, 2023, 8:46 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Passau

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Passau
PI Affiliation
University of Passau

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2021-12-01
End date
2023-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study explores how own and second-order perceptions within agricultural networks affect individuals’ willingness to experiment with new and sustainable agricultural practices (organic fertilizer). Specifically, we investigate the beliefs about whether a lower greenness level of rice fields is a subject of gossip in the village and how these second-order perceptions relate to farmers stated willingness to experiment with a new practice - if that practice is believed to lead to less green rice fields. Further, we explore how these second-order perceptions relate to own perceptions about the importance on greenness, to farmers’ use of chemical fertilizers and how these perceptions are correlated within agricultural networks and with farmers’ position within such networks

We use two in-survey experiments to derive causal evidence on how stated willingness to experiment with new farming practices change if second-order perceptions are made more salient to a farmer. Specifically, in the first survey experiment (survey 1) we ask about the willingness to experiment with the new practice but randomize whether the question about possible gossip related to less green fields appears before or after the willingness question and thereby make the point of possible gossip more salient. In a second survey (with a different sample of respondents), we repeat a similar experiment, in which, however, we add a second question related to the greenness level of fields to the randomized question order, such that the treatment effect is supposed to be stronger in comparison to having only one question (as in survey 1). This second question asks respondents to compare the greenness level of their own and others' rice fields, thereby inducing additional salience of the social importance of greenness levels.

Additionally, we investigate not only stated willingness to experiment but also look on actual (dis)adoption behaviour of different fertilizers after a randomized organic farming training intervention and investigate how such adoption behaviours are influenced with own and second-order perceptions before the training intervention.

The study is set in the context of Indonesia, where rice farming is the major income source and where the greenness level of rice fields is often seen as a sign of farm management quality. While nitrogen is a key determinant of rice plant growth and leaf greenness, overuse of nitrogen can have severe negative environmental impacts. The over-application of chemical fertilizers containing nitrogen and thereby ensuring a dark, sophisticated green of the plants, is a widespread phenomenon in Indonesia. We will explore perceptions revolving around greenness, whether fertilizer use behaviour is related to these perceptions and how such perceptions could affect the adoption of sustainable farming practices. The results of this study will provide relevant information for local NGOs working in the context of sustainable agriculture and the Indonesian Government which itself aims to increase the application of sustainable farming practices in the country.

External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Fritz, Manuela, Nathalie Luck and Udit Sawhney. 2023. "My opinion, your opinion – Do group perceptions prevent the adoption of sustainable farming practices?." AEA RCT Registry. May 31. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11003-1.2
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2022-07-01
Intervention End Date
2023-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We will investigate different outcomes for the survey experiments and the training intervention. In addition, we will explore the correlations between the variables of interest in a descriptive manner.

1. For the in-survey experiments (in which the treatment group in survey 1 receives the question about gossip/second-order perception before the question on influence on willingness and in survey 2 receives the question about gossip/second-order perception and the question to compare own fields with other fields before the question on influence on willingness) we will assess the following outcome:

a. Stated influence of greenness to try new agricultural technology: measured on a continous scale from 1 (no influence at all) to 10 (very high influence).

2. For the training intervention (treatment=1 if farmer is in treatment group and was invited to a training in 2022), we will assess the following outcomes:

a. Own opinion about how greenness relates to yields (“importance of greenness/own opinion greenness”). This variable is constructed from the question:

What is the relationship between greenness and yields?

(1) greenness is strongly related to yields
(2) greenness is not related to yields
(3) relationship between greenness and yields is non-linear (inverted U-curve)

b. Second-order perceptions/opinion about gossip about less green fields. This variable is constructed from the question:

Among your neighbours and other farmers in your village, are rice plants that are less green a point of gossip?

(1) yes, there is gossip about greenness
(2) yes, there is gossip by some but not all
(3) no there is no gossip

c. Nitrogen use: this variable is measured as kilogram of Nitrogen use per ha

d. Organic fertilizer use: this variable is binary variable equal to 1 if the respondent applied organic fertilizer in the last season

3. Correlations

a. Correlation between perceived gossip & own opinion (overall and on village and network level)
b. Correlation between the use of nitrogen in a given network and the prevailing opinion on the importance of greenness in a given network
c. Correlation between the rate of adoption of organic fertilizer in a given network and the prevailing opinion on the importance of greenness in a given network

Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Regarding 2c) and 2d) we are particularly interested in the interaction term between stated gossip perception in 2021 and receiving the training intervention in 2022. This will allow us to assess whether the effectiveness of a training intervention about organic farming practices is heterogenous with respect to prevailing perceptions about whether less green rice fields lead to gossip.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The following experimental design and sampling procedure relate to a training experiment on uptake of organic farming. In the course of the endline survey for this experiment, we will include the first survey experiment.

The second survey experiment is included in the endline survey of a different study which assesses the benefits of soil tests. Other than the survey experiment, the data and results of this soil test project will not be used for this registered study, but will be used for a different study. Please refer to the pre-analysis plan registered under https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11448-1.0 for details on this project.


Sampling design

We applied a three-stage random sampling design to select 1,200 respondents. In the first stage, we randomly selected 60 villages, 30 villages in Yogyakarta and 30 villages in Tasikmalaya. In the second stage, we randomly drew farmer group(s) in selected villages. Farmer groups in Indonesia function both as social group but also as task groups for government programmes and the allocation of subsidies.

Training experiment

The treatment was randomised at the village level and consisted of training on organic farming methods and principles. Farmers from groups in control villages did not receive any training. As baseline data was not available at the time of the randomisation, we used publicly available regional data for the stratification. Specifically, we stratified the sample according to urban and rural status and the reported size of agricultural land area per village. In Tasikmalaya, we used ‘travel distance to the district capital’ as an additional stratification criterion as this region is characterised by less developed infrastructure.

In 2018 and 2022, we invited the 20 interviewed farmers in each treatment village to participate in a three-day (2018) / two-day (2022) training on organic farming, with farmers receiving seven hours of training per day. Based on the insights from the theoretical framework, our training intervention addressed experience, beliefs and risks. It offered extensive information about the costs and benefits of organic farming practices and hands-on training to maximize the learning effect and minimize the risk of usage. Raising awareness, changing perceptions and implementation at the community level are intended to address social risks. The training provided farmers with an introduction to organic farming and included information on potential marketing channels. Particular emphasis was placed on practical activities such as making organic fertilisers and pesticides.

During the training in 2022, trainers provided partly a refresher training of the first training. They further augmented the training by a discussion of soil management in organic farming and by training on soil tests. Based on the soil tests that each farmer could conduct for his or her own soil, trainers provided fertilizer recommendations according to organic principles.

Survey experiment

The survey experiment will be included in two surveys. The first survey is the endline survey for the above-mentioned training experiment. The second survey is the endline survey of a different experimental agricultural study conducted with small-scale rice farmers in Yogyakarta focusing on soil tests. As outlined above, we make use of the endline survey of this study to include a second survey experiment.

In the first survey, we randomize the order of the questions about the topic of greenness of rice fields. Respondents in group (1) (survey 1) will first be asked about the degree to which greenness levels of rice fields influences their decision to try a new practice that is good for soil health but could reduce plants’ greenness. Afterwards they will be asked about perceived gossip about greenness levels in their village.

Respondents in group (2) (survey 1) will first be asked about perceived gossip in their village and only afterwards about the degree to which greenness influences their decision to try a new practice that is good for soil health but could reduce plants’ greenness.

In the second survey, we similarly randomize the order of questions about the topic of greenness of rice fields but add a second question to the randomization order (this question is also included in the first survey but asked in the same order to all respondents).

Respondents in group (1) (survey 2), will first be asked about the degree to which greenness influences their decision to try a new practice that is good for soil health but could reduce plants’ greenness. Afterwards they will be asked about perceived gossip in their village and are asked to compare the greenness level of their own rice fields with the greenness level of rice fields of other farmers in their village.

Respondents in group (2) (survey 2), will first be asked about perceived gossip in their village and are asked to compare the greenness level of their own rice fields with the greenness level of rice fields of other farmers in their village. Afterwards they will be asked about the degree to which greenness influences their decision to try a new practice that is good for soil health but could reduce plants’ greenness.

These two survey experiments will allow us to investigate (1) whether making to topic of possible gossip about greenness levels more salient influences own stated willingness to experiment with a new practice that could impact greenness levels and (2) whether the degree to which this is made salient makes a significant difference (i.e., one or two questions in the randomized order).

Both survey experiments are randomized at the individual level and are stratified by village and 2021 organic fertilizer use (survey 1) and 2022 organic fertilizer use (survey 2).

Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Training intervention: randomization at the village level
Survey experiments: randomization at the individual level
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Training intervention: 60 villages
Survey experiments are not clustered.
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,000 farmers in training experiment and first survey experiment (survey 1) and 1,000 farmers in second survey experiment (survey 2)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Training interventions: 30 villages in treatment group, 30 villages in control group
Survey experiments (per survey): 500 farmers in treatment group, 500 farmers in control group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Indonesian Government / RISTEK
IRB Approval Date
2022-06-01
IRB Approval Number
31032022000008
IRB Name
Ethical Review Board of the University of Passau
IRB Approval Date
2020-01-13
IRB Approval Number
N/A

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials