Randomized SMS reminders to vote for youth voters in parliamentary elections

Last registered on March 21, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Randomized SMS reminders to vote for youth voters in parliamentary elections
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011105
Initial registration date
March 16, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 21, 2023, 4:28 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Turku

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Turku
PI Affiliation
Prime Minister’s Office
PI Affiliation
THL

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-03-21
End date
2023-04-02
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
The aim of this randomized field trial is to study the causal effect of SMS voting reminders on turnout of young voters in upcoming Finnish parliamentary elections together with dynamic effects of previously received voting reminders during the 2022 county elections SMS voting reminder trial. The turnout has been noticeably low among youth voters compared to older age groups in Finland. Thus, the target population of this intervention is from 18 to 30 years old individuals who are eligible to vote, living in municipalities with an electronic voting registry (i.e. the turnout is registered at the individual level) and having a cellular phone number. We are going to estimate whether SMS reminder received during the upcoming parliamentary elections will increase turnout and if SMS reminder received during the previous county elections affects the turnout in parliamentary elections and whether this effect differs if SMS reminder was received also during the parliamentary elections. The sample is randomized into control group which does not receive a reminder and into treatment group which receives a neutral reminder on election dates and urges to vote. Treatment group will receive an SMS before the advance voting period and another before the election day. Potential heterogeneous effects by predicted voting propensity, predicted left-right voting, voting area party support, previous voting participation, geographical area and socioeconomic status will be estimated. In addition to that we will explore spill over effects within the household, close by neighbourhood and workplace.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Hirvonen, Salomo et al. 2023. "Randomized SMS reminders to vote for youth voters in parliamentary elections." AEA RCT Registry. March 21. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11105-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Randomized SMS reminder to vote for youth voters in parliamentary elections.
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2023-03-21
Intervention End Date
2023-04-02

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcome of this study is whether the individual voted (binary: Voted/Did Not Vote) in 2023 parliamentary elections. We study dynamic effects on this outcome by previous county elections treatment status (Hirvonen, Salomo et al. 2022. "Text Message Mobilization of Young Voters." AEA RCT Registry. January 11. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8790-1.0), and heterogeneous effects by predicted voting propensity, predicted left-right voting, voting area party support, previous voting participation, geographical area (municipality type) and socioeconomic status (education and profession). In addition to that we will measure the primary outcome for individuals outside of the sample in order to explore spill over effects within the household, close by neighbourhood (by residential building code) and workplace.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Youth voters will be randomized into a control group and a treatment group. The latter will receive SMS reminders to vote in parliamentary elections.
Experimental Design Details
This field experiment consists of randomization of youth voters into a treatment group, which receives SMS (Short Message Service) reminders and into a control group. The target population of this study is eligible voters in Finnish 2023 parliamentary elections aged from 18 to 30 years old living in municipalities with an electronic voting registry, meaning that the outcome variable is available for these individuals. After combining information from the election registry and phone number availability from the ProFinder database, we are left with 49,866 individuals with a cellular phone number. We randomize these individuals into the treatment group (60% of the total sample) and into the control group (40% of the total sample). Below are the text messages which will be sent out for individuals in the treatment group both in Finnish and Swedish (translated to English):


1.Before the advance voting period

“Hi, a reminder for you that the parliamentary elections are held on the 2nd of April. The domestic advance voting period is from 22nd of March until 28th of March. Read more vaalit.fi. Best Regards, the Ministry of Justice”

2.Before the election day

“Hi, a reminder for you that the parliamentary elections are held on the 2nd of April. Read more vaalit.fi. Best Regards, the Ministry of Justice”


After the election the outcome variable from the electronic voting registry is merged into treatment status of the county and parliamentary election experiments and covariate data, and pseudonymised by Statistics of Finland. We will use the Linear Probability Model as our main model for the ease of the interpretation of the coefficients but will also conduct analysis using logit as a robustness check.

In order to estimate the dynamic effects, four randomized groups will be formed; individuals who got a SMS reminder in both elections, individuals who got a reminder in the previous county elections but not in upcoming parliamentary elections, individuals who did not get a reminder in the county elections but got a reminder in the parliamentary elections and individuals who did not get a SMS reminder in either election.

We will estimate potential heterogeneous effects by predicted voting propensity, predicted left-right voting, voting area party support, previous voting participation, geographical area (municipality type) and socioeconomic status (education and profession). In addition to that we will measure the primary outcome for individuals outside of the sample in order to explore spill over effects within the household, close by neighbourhood (by residential building code) and workplace.

We will predict a propensity to vote for every individual using the available administrative data utilising logit and elastic net models using control group individuals as the sample and voting in 2023 parliamentary elections as the dependent variable. Independent variables, measured before the treatment, for the prediction model are individuals’ gender, age, immigration background, logarithm of taxable income, educational background, SES background, eligibility to vote for the first time and municipality fixed effects. We will group the voting propensities by 25th, 25-75th, and top 25th percentiles in order to test possible heterogenous treatment effects between different voting propensity groups.

Left-right voting prediction is estimated based on surveys on voting in the parliamentary elections for youth voters and the survey sharing covariates which are observable in the registry data in order to get a left-right voting prediction for our sample individuals. In addition to that, we will employ honest causal forest machine learning algorithm in order to further explore possible heterogenous treatment effects.
Randomization Method
Individuals are randomly selected into the treatment group (60% of the total sample) and into the control group (40% of the total sample) using municipalities, gender and birth year as blocks for the randomization by using randtreat command in STATA 17 and allocating misfits in order to achieve (close to) overall balance in control and treatment group shares.
Randomization Unit
Individual eligible youth voter.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Total sample size of 49,866 individuals.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Total sample size of 49,866 individuals.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
60% of the total sample size or approximately 29,920 individuals in the treatment group and 40% of the total sample size or approximately 19,946 individuals in the control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
1.26 %-points for treatment versus the control individuals. Assuming p-value of 0.05, power of 0.8, and control group outcome as 0.572 (turnout for under 31 years old in 2019 parliamentary elections), and not using controls. Two-sided test for two sample proportions calculated by using power function in STATA 17.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethics Committee for Human Sciences at the University of Turku
IRB Approval Date
2023-02-15
IRB Approval Number
8/2023

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials