The Impacts and Mechanisms of Rural Social Emotional Learning Classes in China

Last registered on April 13, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Impacts and Mechanisms of Rural Social Emotional Learning Classes in China
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011199
Initial registration date
April 06, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 13, 2023, 3:48 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Center for Experimental Economics in Education at Shaanxi Normal University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
PI Affiliation
Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China
PI Affiliation
Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China
PI Affiliation
Center for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2023-03-06
End date
2024-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This project aims to use experimental economics and educational science to improve students’ social-emotional development in rural areas by conducting social and emotional learning courses in rural primary schools. The project will use randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the impact of social-emotional learning (SEL) classes on students’ self-awareness, self-esteem, psychological health, interpersonal relationships, behavior problems, and psychological pressures. In the first treatment arm, rural class teachers (without requirement on psychology background) will be given a 2-day training on SEL every semester and then asked to teach SEL classes to rural students once every week in consecutive semesters. In the second treatment arm, rural teachers and students will receive the same basic treatment (as in treatment group 1). In addition, to motivate and augment the ability of the unskilled rural teachers, teachers from the same county will form a learning group, with 6-7 teachers in each group, and a chief teacher will be elected by group members to supervise and organize discussion on the teaching of SEL courses. The control group will not receive any treatment. This project aims to compare the effects of the two interventions relative to the control group.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Chang, Fang et al. 2023. "The Impacts and Mechanisms of Rural Social Emotional Learning Classes in China." AEA RCT Registry. April 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11199-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The research team plans to conduct a questionnaire survey at 138 rural schools and then randomly assign the schools to three groups, each consisting of about 46 schools.
The first group is the "rural teachers" course group (42 schools). The project team will train rural teachers on social-emotional learning for two days every semester, provide SEL relevant materials (including teacher’s guidelines, student textbook, instruction slides, and teaching props) to the course group, and require each rural teacher to give a class once a week and punch in after class. The rural teachers will teach the social-emotional learning course once a week in their own school, and give feedback in the online community.
The second group is the " rural teachers collective learning" course group (49 schools). The basis setting is the same with the first group. At the same time, 6-7 teachers from the same county form a learning group, and they select one teacher as the chief teacher, namely the group leader. The chief teacher regularly supervises other teachers in the group to attend classes and organize collective discussions, and the research team provides training opportunities for the chief teachers to encourage the chief teachers to lead and organize group learning and discussions on SEL courses.
The control group will not receive any treatment from the research team.
Intervention Start Date
2023-04-10
Intervention End Date
2024-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
student's test scores, mental health, and non-cognitive measures
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Students' test score includes standardized test score given by research team and students’ test scores in schools.
Mental health includes the SDQ scale to measure students' mental health.
non-cognitive measures include students’ Big-Five personality measures, self-efficacy, and dimensions related to students’ SEL development, like self-awareness, self-management, interpersonal skills, and growth mindset, etc.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The teacher-student relationship, students’ learning interests, education aspirations, students’ daily behaviors in schools, etc.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The research team plans to conduct a questionnaire survey at 138 rural schools and then randomly assign the schools to three groups, each consisting of about 46 schools.
The first group is the "rural teachers" course group (42 schools). The project team will train rural teachers on social-emotional learning for two days every semester, provide SEL-relevant materials (including teacher’s guidelines, student textbook, instruction slides, and teaching props) to the course group, and require each rural teacher to give a class once a week and punch in after class. The rural teachers will teach the social-emotional learning course once a week in their own school, and give feedback in the online community.
The second group is the " rural teachers collective learning" course group (49 schools). The basis setting is the same with the first group. At the same time, 6-7 teachers from the same county form a learning group, and they select one teacher as the chief teacher, namely the group leader. The chief teacher regularly supervises other teachers in the group to attend classes and organize collective discussions, and the research team provides training opportunities for the chief teachers to encourage the chief teachers to lead and organize group learning and discussions on SEL courses.
The control group will not receive any treatment from the research team.

By cooperating with the provincial education department in Gansu Province, we are able to carry out the trial in three prefectures and cover 138 rural schools. In each school, one or two classes in Grade 4 are randomly drawn to make up the final sample. The research team provides intervention courses/materials to treatment schools for free and supports the daily project management.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
School level
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
138 primary schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
around 5,000 to 6,000 primary students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Treatment 1 Rural teachers course group: 42 schools
Treatment 2 Rural teachers collective learning course group: 49 schools
Control: 47 schools
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
In order to fulfill statistical power, we assume that the minimum detectable effect size equals 0.2 SD.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Tsinghua SEM Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2021-12-07
IRB Approval Number
2021-TSEM-19