|
Field
Secondary Outcomes (End Points)
|
Before
Secondary outcomes include whether students report acceptances to CollegePoint schools; whether students report their top choice institution (among their acceptance choice set) being a CollegePoint school; and student reports of the topics they discussed with their advisor and how influential their advisor was on their college plans and decisions.
|
After
Secondary outcomes include whether students report acceptances to CollegePoint schools; whether students report their top choice institution (among their acceptance choice set) being a CollegePoint school; and student reports of the topics they discussed with their advisor and how influential their advisor was on their college plans and decisions.
Given prior evidence that undermatch is concentrated among geographically-dispersed high-achieving, low-income students, who have fewer selective institutions close to where they live and less access to college information or advising (Avery and Hoxby, 2012; Hoxby and Turner, 2013), we will investigate potential heterogeneity in the impact of Advising Plus based on students' geographic residence and proximity to selective institutions.
|