Field
Trial Status
|
Before
in_development
|
After
on_going
|
Field
Abstract
|
Before
Weather uncertainty is a significant source of agricultural production risks, and is increasingly salient in the context of climate change. Short- to medium-range weather forecasts could help farmers optimize the timing of agricultural practices, increasing returns to agricultural investment. However, smallholder farmers in most parts of the developing world do not have access to highly localized, accurate forecasts, nor are forecasts customized to convey weather conditions relevant for agricultural decision-making. In this study, we investigate whether accurate, relevant-for-context, probabilistic medium-range weather forecasts can aid farmer decision-making through a lab-in-the-field experiment. We will analyze whether probability training, climate change awareness, prior luck impact choices in the experiment and willingness-to-pay for weather forecasts. In addition, we will also analyze whether the format in which weather forecasts are communicated impacts choices/decisions.
|
After
Weather uncertainty is a significant source of agricultural production risks, and is increasingly salient in the context of climate change. Short- to medium-range weather forecasts could help farmers optimize the timing of agricultural practices, increasing returns to agricultural investment. However, smallholder farmers in most parts of the developing world do not have access to highly localized, accurate forecasts, nor are forecasts customized to convey weather conditions relevant for agricultural decision-making. In this study, we investigate whether accurate, relevant-for-context, probabilistic, medium-range weather forecasts can aid farmer decision-making through a lab-in-the-field experiment. We will analyze whether climate change salience, probability training, prior luck impact choices in the experiment and willingness-to-pay for weather forecasts.
|
Field
Trial Start Date
|
Before
July 03, 2023
|
After
August 05, 2023
|
Field
Last Published
|
Before
June 15, 2023 04:43 PM
|
After
August 10, 2023 06:29 PM
|
Field
Intervention (Public)
|
Before
Farmers are randomly assigned to four groups: (1) probability training treatment; (2) climate change awareness treatment; (3) probability training and climate change awareness treatments; (4) neither (control).
1. The probability training treatment involves farmers watching an interactive probability training video
2. The climate change awareness treatment involves farmers watching a video describing changing weather patterns globally and locally, the impact it has on coffee farming, and how weather forecasts might help time practices better to mitigate weather effects on production.
3. In round 1 of the experiment, farmers will receive a few hypothetical scenarios that involve choosing a location with specific weather conditions out of two locations, for which they see weather forecasts. Once a location is chosen, farmers will indicate their confidence in their choice, and then in-experiment-round weather will be realized. Farmers’ payoffs will depend on the realized weather.
4. In round 2 of the experiment, farmers will receive a few hypothetical cultivation practice-related scenarios that involve choosing an action following a weather forecast. Once an action is taken, in-experiment-round weather will be realized. Farmers’ payoffs will depend on the realized weather.
5. Finally, we will elicit farmers’ willingness-to-pay for accurate, customized, probabilistic weather forecasts.
|
After
Farmers are randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) climate change salience information treatment; (2) probability training and climate change salience information treatments; (3) control.
1. The climate change salience information treatment involves farmers watching a video describing changing weather patterns globally and locally, and the impact it has on coffee farming.
2. The probability training information treatment involves farmers watching a probability training video.
3. In round 1 of the experiment, farmers will receive a few hypothetical scenarios that involve choosing a location with specific weather conditions out of two locations, for which they see weather forecasts. Once a location is chosen, farmers will indicate their confidence in their choice ('points-at-stake'), and then in-experiment-round weather will be realized. Farmers’ payoffs will depend on the realized weather.
4. In round 2 of the experiment, farmers will receive a few hypothetical cultivation practice-related scenarios that involve choosing an action following a weather forecast. Once an action is taken, in-experiment-round weather will be realized. Farmers’ payoffs will depend on the realized weather.
5. Finally, we will elicit farmers’ willingness-to-pay for accurate, customized, probabilistic weather forecasts.
|
Field
Intervention Start Date
|
Before
July 03, 2023
|
After
August 05, 2023
|
Field
Primary Outcomes (End Points)
|
Before
Willingness-to-pay for accurate, customized weather forecasts; choice of correct forecast; confidence in chosen forecast; choice of action appropriate for realized weather in hypothetical agricultural decisions; game score/payoff.
|
After
Willingness to pay for probabilistic medium-range weather forecasts; choosing the correct forecast; choosing the action with the higher expected payoff.
|
Field
Primary Outcomes (Explanation)
|
Before
Willingness-to-pay for weather forecasts will be elicited from farmers using the Becker–DeGroot–Marschak (BDM) method.
Choice of correct forecast will be a binary outcome taking a value 1 if the chosen forecast is more (less) likely and 0 otherwise.
Confidence in chosen forecast will be elicited by asking farmers to choose the number of ‘points-at-stake’. So, if the desired weather event occurs, the ‘points-at-stake’ are added to their score, and if the desired weather event does not occur, the ‘points-at-stake’ are deducted from their score.
Choice of action appropriate for realized weather in the hypothetical agricultural decisions will be a binary outcome taking a value 1 if the action is desired in the realized state of the world; and 0 otherwise.
Game score/payoff will be constructed by adding points earned over each decision in the experiment.
|
After
|
Field
Experimental Design (Public)
|
Before
We will recruit small- and medium-holder coffee farmers in Karnataka, India. Farmers will be randomly assigned to 2 cross-randomized treatments (probability training, climate change awareness).
Each farmer will answer survey questions, watch their assigned video(s), and play a hypothetical decision-making game where decisions depend on weather realizations and decisions are made after receiving a weather forecast. The game consists of two rounds. In the first round, farmers will receive hypothetical scenarios in which they choose between two locations with different weather forecasts, picking the location where a weather event is more (less) likely to occur. After their choice, a weather realization will occur in-game. Farmer payoffs depend on realized weather. In the second round, farmers will receive hypothetical agricultural scenarios, and choose whether to take an action or not, following a weather forecast. After their choice of action, a weather realization will occur in-game. Farmer payoffs depend on realized weather.
After the end of the game, we will elicit farmers’ willingness-to-pay for accurate, medium-range probabilistic weather forecasts.
|
After
We will recruit small- and medium-holder coffee farmers in Karnataka, India. Farmers will be randomly assigned to (1) climate change salience information treatment, (2) probability training and climate change salience information treatment, (3) control.
Each farmer will answer survey questions, watch their assigned video(s), and play a hypothetical decision-making game where decisions depend on weather realizations and decisions are made after receiving a weather forecast. The game consists of two rounds. In the first round, farmers will receive hypothetical scenarios in which they choose between two locations with different weather forecasts, picking the location where a weather event is more (less) likely to occur. After their choice, a weather realization will occur in-game. Farmer payoffs depend on realized weather. In the second round, farmers will receive hypothetical agricultural scenarios, and choose whether to take an action or not, following a weather forecast. After their choice of action, a weather realization will occur in-game. Farmer payoffs depend on realized weather.
After the end of the game, we will elicit farmers’ willingness-to-pay for accurate, medium-range probabilistic weather forecasts.
|
Field
Planned Number of Clusters
|
Before
1200 farmers
|
After
At least 1200 farmers (actual number depends on number of participants enrolled).
|
Field
Planned Number of Observations
|
Before
18,000 decisions (1200 farmers X 15 decisions)
1200 observations for willingness to pay
|
After
At least1200 individuals (actual number depends on number of participants enrolled).
|
Field
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
|
Before
300 farmers in control (placebo video); 300 farmers in treatment 1 (probability training); 300 farmers in treatment 2 (climate change awareness); 300 farmers in treatment 1 + 2 (probability training + climate change awareness)
|
After
504 farmers receiving the climate change salience information treatment; 348 farmers receiving the climate change salience and probability training information treatment; 348 farmers in the control group (actual numbers depends on number of participants enrolled).
|