Effects of Accelerated Tutoring on Students’ Oral Reading Fluency

Last registered on June 28, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Effects of Accelerated Tutoring on Students’ Oral Reading Fluency
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0011644
Initial registration date
June 24, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 28, 2023, 4:35 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Texas A&M University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Stanford University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-08-01
End date
2024-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The study design is a randomized control trial that compares the reading proficiency of kindergarten students who receive the accelerated 1:1 high dosage tutoring support to kindergarten students who receive the regular 1:1 high dosage tutoring support. The study will involve 800 kindergarten students enrolled in 40 kindergarten classrooms identified by the district who agree to participate in Chapter One’s 1:1 high dosage tutoring, randomly assigning 400 to one treatment group (T1, accelerated tutoring) and 400 to the other treated group (T2, regular tutoring). All students in the study will receive the tutoring support (i.e., accelerated tutoring or regular tutoring) throughout their kindergarten school year assuming they remain enrolled in the school district.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Cortes, Kalena and Susanna Loeb. 2023. "Effects of Accelerated Tutoring on Students’ Oral Reading Fluency." AEA RCT Registry. June 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.11644-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The Intervention: The study design is a randomized control trial (RCT) that compares the reading proficiency of kindergarten students who receive the accelerated 1:1 high dosage tutoring support to kindergarten students who receive the regular 1:1 high dosage tutoring support. The study will involve 800 kindergarten students enrolled in 40 kindergarten classrooms identified by the district who agree to participate in Chapter One’s 1:1 high dosage tutoring, randomly assigning 400 to one treatment group (T1, accelerated tutoring) and 400 to the other treated group (T2, regular tutoring). All students in the study will receive the tutoring support (i.e., accelerated tutoring or regular tutoring) throughout their kindergarten school year assuming they remain enrolled in the school district.

The RCT will be undertaken to determine if the accelerated tutoring support contributes to reading proficiency and, if yes, to what extent? Two hypotheses will be tested,

(1) Null hypothesis: Students’ proficiency on literacy outcomes is equal between two groups, one that receives the accelerated tutoring (treated group, T1) and one that receives the regular tutoring (treated group, T2).

(2) Alternative hypothesis: Students who receive the accelerated tutoring (T1) will make greater gains on literacy outcomes than students who receive the regular tutoring (T2).

Random assignment to both treatment groups (e.g., accelerated tutoring group (T1) vs. regular tutoring group (T2)) will create baseline equivalence of the two groups or no systematic differences at baseline, thereby reducing bias. To strengthen internal validity, members of the two groups will be similar in age, grade level, enrollment in classrooms, and performance level in literacy.

Research Question: This RCT study aims to address the following research question: What is the effect of the accelerated tutoring support (T1) on students’ literacy outcomes compared to students’ literacy outcomes who received the regular tutoring support (T2)?

Randomization: To assign students to one of the experimental conditions, we will employ a student-level randomized control trial design. Specifically, within each classroom (N=40), we randomly assigned half of the students to receive the accelerated tutoring support (treated group, T1) and half of the other students received the regular tutoring support (treated group, T2). The total randomization sample consist of 800 students enrolled in kindergarten classrooms: 400 students in one treated group (accelerated tutoring, T1) and 400 students in the other treated group (regular tutoring, T2).
Intervention Start Date
2023-08-01
Intervention End Date
2024-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Kindergarten: end-of-year reading/literacy outcomes
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Reading/literacy outcomes: reading test scores, reading foundation stage assessment, oral fluency assessment.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
To assign students to one of the experimental conditions, we will employ a student-level randomized control trial design. Specifically, within each classroom (N=40), we randomly assigned half of the students to receive the accelerated tutoring support (treated group, T1) and half of the other students received the regular tutoring support (treated group, T2). The total randomization sample consist of 800 students enrolled in kindergarten classrooms: 400 students in one treated group (accelerated tutoring, T1) and 400 students in the other treated group (regular tutoring, T2).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer randomization
Randomization Unit
Student-level randomization within each kindergarten classroom
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
800 students in AY 2023-24
Sample size: planned number of observations
800 students in AY 2023-24
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
400 students in the treated group;
400 students in the control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
MDES: 0.162 (standard deviation)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Stanford University
IRB Approval Date
2023-05-16
IRB Approval Number
68027
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information