Financial Scarcity and Economic Decision-Making

Last registered on December 01, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Financial Scarcity and Economic Decision-Making
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012303
Initial registration date
November 17, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 01, 2023, 4:42 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Shandong University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
CNRS, University of Lyon
PI Affiliation
Shandong University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-11-20
End date
2024-07-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
We run two independent experiments to test the impact of financial scarcity on economic decision making. In the laboratory study, we exogenously introduce financial scarcity by randomly assigning a high or a low initial endowment to student subjects. In the field experiment, we compared rural residents from relatively rich and poor rural areas to characterize financial scarcity, and utilized priming techniques to induce immediate feelings of scarcity. Furthermore, we examine long-term financial pressure by comparing parents of two boys with parents of two girls in high bribe price regions, where financial scarcity is prevalent. The core hypothesis of this study posits that financial scarcity prompts individuals to prioritize "saving money" over "making money" when faced with conflicting decisions. This fundamental conflict in decision-making can be manifested and empirically tested across various economic games.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Jiang, Shuguang, Marie Claire Villeval and Qian Wei. 2023. "Financial Scarcity and Economic Decision-Making ." AEA RCT Registry. December 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12303-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Study 1 (lab experiment) involves the random assignment of participants to either a high or low initial endowment condition.

In Study 2 (field experiment), participants are exposed to either financial scarcity priming or no priming, achieved by emphasizing a high bride price. Under the priming condition, subjects respond to questions about bride price and express their concerns regarding their children's future financial needs before making economic decisions.


Intervention Start Date
2023-11-20
Intervention End Date
2024-07-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
For both Study 1 and Study 2, the primary outcomes include: (1) how many correct answers for the "making money" task described in experimental design details; (2) how much the individual chooses to invest in the risky project compared to the risk free project in a long-term investment; (3) the subjects' subjective stated preference between "making more money" versus "spending less"; (4) subjects' risk preferences in the gain domain and the loss domain. For Study 2, the monetary value of time is also a primary outcome.

The primary hypotheses are as follows:
(1) Individuals experiencing financial scarcity are expected to underperform in the "make more money" task compared to their counterparts, as their attention is hypothesized to be more directed towards the "save money" task. We will employ non-parametric tests to compare the number of correct answers of those considered financially affluent and those facing financial constraints.
(2) People under financial scarcity are anticipated to exhibit greater myopia, leading to increased risk aversion in the long-term investment task. Non-parametric tests will be utilized to compare the investment amounts in the risky asset between individuals classified as financially rich and those deemed financially poor."
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
For both Study 1 and Study2, we also consider the time preference and cognitive ability as a seconderary outcomes. For Study 2, we will also consider some other outcomes, including subjects' cognitive ability, aspiration and hope, and their investment to offsprings.

We will test whether the link between financial scarcity, performance in the main task , and long-term investlment is mediated by variables such as time preferences, cognitive ability. We also will test whether financial scarcity is related to subjects' aspiration, hope and their investment to offsprings.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Study 1 (lab experiment): Student subjects are randomly assigned an endowment of either 1000 or 5000 Experimental Currency Units. Then they perform a series of economic tasks that allow us to measure notably risk and time preference, long-term investment with risk, and decision conflict between making money and saving money.
Study 2 (field experiment): We will run a lab-in the-field experiment in areas with high bride price, recruiting rural residents who have unmarried children. We will randomly prime the financial pressure from high bride price and the impact of this pressure on economic decisions in variouseconomic games. These include assessments of risk and time preferences, long-term investment with risk, and decision conflicts between making money and saving money.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
In the lab experiment, randomization and assignment to a given condition will be made by the computer program. In the field experiment, subjects will be randomised into the priming or no priming condition by an experimenter's coin flip. The random draw will be made in advance for each subject before we start the inverview.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Study 1 (lab experiment): 180;
Study 2 (field experiment): 350.
Sample size: planned number of observations
Study 1 (lab experiment): 180; Study 2 (field experiment): 350.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Study 1 (lab experiment): 90 per each treatment (high versus low endowment)
Study 2 (field experiment): 50 control in low bride price area (also rich area), 50 parents of two boys in the no priming condition; 50 parents of two boys in the priming condition; 50 parents of two girls in the no priming condition; 50 parents of two girls in the priming condition; 50 parents of other conditions (not parents of two girls or two boys) in the no priming condition. 50 parents of other conditions (not parents of two girls or two boys) in the priming condition.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Based on a pilot of Study 1, the mean difference of correct answers in "making money" task is 3 beween the high versus low endowment, with average standard deviation of 4, which indicates an effect size of 0.75. The mean difference of investment in long-term investment is 12 beween the high versus low endowment, with average standard deviation of 27, which indicates an effect size of 0.43.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
SDU-CER-LAB RESEARCH ETHICS REVIEW BOARD
IRB Approval Date
2023-10-13
IRB Approval Number
1013CER2023