Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Firms with more competitors may have different WTP. Their WTP may be higher if they perceive advertising as beneficial to help distinguish them from competitors. But, the effect may also go in the other direction - firms in competitive sectors often work in settings where many competitors are available on the same street and they face relatively inelastic demand because the sell or provide commodity services. If that is the case, firms with more competitors may have lower WTP. Put the other way, firms with fewer competitors may offer more specialized services that would benefit from advertising to a wider audience.
We hypothesize that the use of mobile money services and knowledge of mobile money fees and taxes could significantly affect firms’ WTP for directory listing depending on tax priming. Firms using the mobile money services in tax primed group might modify their WTP for directory listing depending on their view of how taxes would impact the cost and benefit of directory listing. If firms often use mobile money for transactions, they may be used to mobile transactions with customers and suppliers that would increase their WTP to list their firm.
Finally, we will look at heterogeneity by firm infrastructure/assets and tenure to understand if more established and larger firms have higher WTP with and without tax priming. We hypothesize that more established businesses may be more likely to be registered with the local government - especially if they operate a firm that has a defined storefront, have been operating for more years, or have more business assets.