Unpacking the Long-Term Impact of Holistic Supports for Community College Students: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Last registered on December 01, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Unpacking the Long-Term Impact of Holistic Supports for Community College Students: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012406
Initial registration date
November 16, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 01, 2023, 4:21 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Chicago Crime Lab and Urban Education Lab

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Chicago

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2016-01-01
End date
2029-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
A growing body of evidence finds that comprehensive programs, designed to address the multiple barriers community college students face to degree attainment, hold substantial promise for improving community college completion rates (Weiss et al., 2019; Sommo et al., 2018; Evans et al., 2017). Our research team has added to this literature through an RCT of the OMD program. OMD is a non-profit organization that provides financial, academic, personal, and professional supports to community college students. Our study found that the randomized offer of a spot in the OMD program leads to a statistically significant and substantively meaningful increase in community college enrollment, persistence, and associate degree attainment three years after randomization (Hallberg, Hofmeister, Bertrand, & Morgan, 2022).

Building on this RCT in which 4,878 aspiring community college students were randomly assigned to either an offer of a spot on the OMD program or business as usual support, the proposed study aims to add to this literature by examining the long-term effects of providing holistic supports to community college students. Specifically, we will examine the impact of the OMD program on students’ long-term employment prospects and four-year college transfers and bachelor’s degree attainment. We will also use these data and those from the original RCT to complete an analysis of the program’s cost effectiveness.

Registration Citation

Citation
Bertrand , Marianne and Kelly Hallberg. 2023. "Unpacking the Long-Term Impact of Holistic Supports for Community College Students: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial." AEA RCT Registry. December 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12406-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
OMD is a non-profit organization serving community college students in the Chicago metro area that supports students financially, academically, socially, and professionally.
Intervention Start Date
2016-01-01
Intervention End Date
2021-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The proposed follow up study will track associate degree completion, transfer to 4-year institutions, 4-year degree completion, and employment outcomes up to nine years after randomization.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The proposed follow up study will analyze the cost-effectiveness to understand the cost of the improved outcomes that result from program participation.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The original study was an RCT in which randomization was implemented at the student-level, blocking on the campus the applicant was enrolled in or intended to enroll in and whether the applicant was a graduating high school student or a current community college
student. The research team will use regression analysis using a linear probability model to estimate intent-to-treat effects with fixed effects at the randomization block level, and will use two-stage least squares regression with the treatment assignment as an instrument to
estimate the effects of treatment-on-the-treated.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Prospective and current community college students applied to the OMD program through the standard application process. OMD screened applicants for program eligibility and the complete list of eligible applicants was sent to the research team. The research team then implemented permutation randomization in STATA, blocking on intended campus and high school or current community college status.
Randomization Unit
Randomization was conducted at the student-level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
In spring 2016, a total of 1,452 unique, eligible OMD applicants were randomized, 779 of whom were offered a spot in the program. In spring 2017, 2,821 unique, eligible OMD applicants were randomized, 1,396 of whom were offered a spot in the program. In spring 2018, 623 unique, eligible OMD applicants were randomized, 398 of whom were offered a spot in the program. Across these three cohorts, a total of 4,896 unique applicants were randomized, 2,573 of whom were offered a spot in the program.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
2,567 scholars were randomized into the treatment group. 2,311 scholars were randomized into the control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
With an analytic sample of 4,878 individuals, we are confident that we are sufficiently powered to detect substantively meaningful effects on our primary outcome of interest. Given a two-tailed test, a significance level of 0.05 and .80 power and more than 100 degrees of freedom (number of students in the sample less the number of blocks less the number of covariates), Schochet (2008) gives a value of 2.80 for this constant. Based on these calculations we estimate that the study is powered to detect a minimum detectible effect size (MDES) of 0.08 standard deviations. For our primary outcomes of interest (transfer, four-year degree completion, and employment rate), we draw on the existing literature to estimate baseline outcomes in order to translate the MDES into a more meaningful metric. The CCC FY21 Statistical Digest estimated that the transfer-out rate for first-time full-time degree seeking students within three years of enrollment is 13 percent (CCC, 2022). Using this as our baseline transfer rate, we estimate that the proposed study is powered to detect a change of 2.7 percentage points. The Community College Research Center estimates Illinois’ community college cohort bachelor’s completion rate to be 17 percent (Jenkins & Fink, 2016). Using this as a baseline, we estimate the current study is powered to detect a change in bachelor’s degree completion of 3 percentage points. The Current PopulationSurvey estimates that the unemployment rate for individuals with some college and no degree was 8.3 percent and 7.1 percent for those with an associate degree in 2020 (CPS, 2020). Based on the associate degree completion for the study control group of 26 percent, we use a baseline unemployment rate of 7.4 percent to estimate that the proposed study will be powered to detect an effect of 2 percentage points.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Chicago Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2016-01-25
IRB Approval Number
IRB15-1040