The Power to Conserve: A Field Experiment on Electricity Use in Qatar

Last registered on November 13, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The Power to Conserve: A Field Experiment on Electricity Use in Qatar
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012431
Initial registration date
November 03, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
November 13, 2023, 2:21 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
London School of Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
George Mason University
PI Affiliation
University of Alabama
PI Affiliation
Qatar University
PI Affiliation
University of Alabama

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2019-02-01
End date
2020-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Our natural field experiment tests the effects of moral suasion messages on residential electricity use in Doha, Qatar. We use two types of treatment messages leveraging religious and national identity. Our experimental sample consists of 6,096 residential customers. We analyse effects on monthly electricity use using a difference-in-differences estimation strategy. Further, we test for heterogeneities in treatment effects using machine learning models. We show evidence for customers who respond more to the treatment being more likely to believe that their actions to conserve energy are both easy and effective. We rule out other differences driving heterogeneities in responses, including customers' nationality, residence type, pre-intervention use or knowledge about energy use.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Al-Ubaydli, Omar et al. 2023. "The Power to Conserve: A Field Experiment on Electricity Use in Qatar." AEA RCT Registry. November 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12431-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Our intervention consists of two randomized 'nudge'-style interventions to motivate reductions in electricity use by evoking both identity and agency. The first is a message quoting a passage from the Qur'an stressing the importance of conservation (Religious Message). The second is a message reminding households that the government of Qatar prioritizes energy conservation (National Message). The treatments that we use leverage injunctive norms (what people "ought" to do) rather than descriptive norms (what people actually do), and are intended to leverage individuals' identity. Additionally, both messages evoke agency, by mentioning that "You have the power to conserve!".
Intervention Start Date
2019-05-01
Intervention End Date
2019-10-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Monthly electricity use in kWh.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Since Akerlof and Kranton's seminal work, economists have theorized that identity can affect economic choices through taking actions that preserve individuals' self-image (Akerlof and Kranton, 2000). Normative prescriptions that are inherent in certain aspects of identity can increase personal utility when individuals take actions conforming to such prescriptions. Based on this idea, we use explicit primes leveraging injunctive norms of conservation inherent in two aspects of identity in Qatar.

First, we leverage the fact that religion is an important part of Qatari life, and its residents are predominantly Muslim. Therefore, priming religious values promoting conservation could lead to behavior change if people value their self-image as Muslims. In our treatment message, we use a specific verse from the Qur'an that asks its followers to 'waste not by excess'. This treatment is similar in spirit to the message used to encourage credit card debt repayment in Bursztyn et al. (2019).

Second, residents of Qatar may see themselves as playing a role in the country's stated desire to develop its economy in a more sustainable manner. Qatar instituted the National Program for Conservation and Energy Efficiency in 2012 - a campaign to encourage conservation of electricity and water. We reference this program and its patronage by the Emir of Qatar in our second treatment message to prime individuals' identity as Qatari residents and remind them that conserving energy is congruent with this identity.

Finally, in both treatment messages we remind customers that they have the agency to conserve energy. This part of the message serves to reinforce intrinsic motivation to conserve energy, which is important since extrinsic financial rewards to conserve energy are not well established in Qatar.

To select customers into the sample for randomized assignment, we proceeded in the following way. First, we keep only those meters in the database for which there exist at least one bill-month observation for the period between April 2018 to March 2019. Second, we keep only those meters that are billed as either a flat or a villa within this time period. Third, we include only those meters that are registered as belonging to "Regular Customers" or "Qatari Owners", excluding properties that are registered as being "Rented out by Qataris". Fourth, we consider only those customers who have a cellphone number registered with the utility to randomize into treated and control groups while balancing on observed average monthly electricity use over April 2018 to March 2019. Finally, we note that electricity use varies not just across months of the year, but also by type of residence (flats or villas) and ownership category (national or non-national). We anticipated heterogeneous effects among these groups and, hence, stratify the experiment on type of residence and ownership category. This results in three strata – (i) flats (n=4,803), (ii) villas owned by non-Qatari individuals (n=647), and (iii) villas owned by Qatari individuals (n=665). We do not include Qatari owners of flats as a separate stratum due to the low numbers of such premises relative to other categories in the customer database.

Overall, and within each strata, we divided customers into the two treatment groups and a control group in a 2:2:1 ratio within the sample of customers who had registered phone numbers in the utility's database.

We use a pre-intervention survey on a randomly selected sample of 247 customers to understand what characteristics of customers explain heterogeneous responses to the treatment messages.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individual customers.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
The planned experiment design was to include 109,728 customer-month observations - 6,096 customers over 18 months. However, due to errors in electricity meter information and reading types that we describe in the paper, we restricted the number of customers and increase the number of months of pre-intervention electricity use data. The process and exclusion criteria are detailed in the paper. Our preferred sample comprises 4,836 customers with pre-intervention use collected over January 2016 to February 2020. Our preferred sample comprises 161,254 customer-month observations.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
We planned to have 2,438 customers in Religious message group, 2,438 customers in National message group, 1,220 customers in Control group in the experiment. After exclusions detailed in the paper, our preferred sample comprises 1,951 customers in the Religious message group, 1,937 customers in the National message group, and 944 customers in the Control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Qatar University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2018-12-09
IRB Approval Number
QU-IRB 999-EA/18

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
Yes
Intervention Completion Date
October 31, 2019, 12:00 +00:00
Data Collection Complete
Yes
Data Collection Completion Date
March 31, 2020, 12:00 +00:00
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
4,836 customers.
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
No
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
161,254 customer-month electricity consumption observations (in kWh).
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
1,951 individuals in Religious message group, 1,937 customers in National message group, and 944 customers in Control group.
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Program Files

Program Files
No
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials