Social norms, parenting behaviors and child aspirations: Two survey experiments in Ghana

Last registered on April 09, 2026

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Social norms, parenting behaviors and child aspirations: Two survey experiments in Ghana
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012461
Initial registration date
November 20, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 01, 2023, 4:57 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
April 09, 2026, 9:01 AM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Barcelona

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Barcelona
PI Affiliation
University of Barcelona
PI Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-11-13
End date
2026-07-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study aims to understand the influence of social norms on survey responses, focusing on parenting behaviors as reported by a sample of ~2,500 parents, and the educational and job aspirations of their adolescent children in Ghana. This sample is part of a larger intervention study (LEAD, Aurino et al. 2024).
We do so through two survey experiments, which we aim to investigate separately. With regards to parents, we test if random prior exposure to a survey module reminding them about social image around culturally sensitive parenting behaviors leads them to report differently on their own disciplinary practices towards their children. We assess whether there is an effect of eliciting social pressure norms on parents reports of their parenting practices, in a way that aligns with their perceived social norms in the community around these behaviors. We test heterogeneity by examining differences in effects by parental gender, socio-economic status (SES), baseline social desirability bias score, and enumerator gender.
For adolescents, we assess if random prior exposure to a survey module to measure child gender attitudes leads to differential reporting on their educational and job aspirations. In doing so, we test whether making gender norms more salient leads to lower reported aspirations and/or expectations for girls, consistent with the ‘stereotype threat’ literature, and boost such aspirations for boys, consistent with the ‘stereotype boost’ hypothesis. Further, we assess whether such effects are different for younger and older adolescents; parental SES, gender bias; and whether they vary by the gender of the enumerator.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Aurino, Elisabetta et al. 2026. "Social norms, parenting behaviors and child aspirations: Two survey experiments in Ghana ." AEA RCT Registry. April 09. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12461-2.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is the order in which adolescents receive two modules within a larger survey: (1) aspirations and expectations followed by gender bias scale (comparison), and (2) gender bias scale followed by educational aspirations and expectations (intervention). Caregivers also receive two modules within a larger survey: (1) parenting questions followed by social pressure module (comparison), and (2) social pressure module followed by parenting questions (intervention).

Update April 2026: we are replicating the experiment ONLY for adolescents in a new survey wave (2026), when adolescents are now aged 15 years on average to explore heterogeneity by age in the effects of priming gender norms on aspirations.
Intervention Start Date
2023-11-13
Intervention End Date
2026-06-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Educational and career aspirations and expectations for adolescents, self-reported disciplinary practices for parents.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
For adolescents, four questions will be administered: (1) Imagine you had no constraints and could study for as long as you liked, or go back to school if you have already left. What level of formal education would you like to complete? and (2) Given your current situation, do you expect you will reach that level of education? (3) When you are about 25 years old, what job would you like to be doing? (4) Given your current situation do you expect you will reach that type of job? Questions are sourced from Young Lives (Favara et al., 2021)
UPDATE April 2026: In this new round, we also added follow-up questions in case educational and job expectations of the adolescent are not aligned with their expectations, eliciting which educational level and job they expect to reach.
For caregivers: Please rate each item as to how often it TYPICALLY occurs in your household. (1) You compliment your child when he/she does something well. (2) You take away privileges, forbade something [OTHER CHILD] liked (e.g., watching TV, playing with friends) when your child misbehaves. (3) You hit your child with a belt, cane, switch, or other object when he/she has done something wrong

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
As exploratory outcomes, in the April 2026 re-run of the experiment, we also added questions on expected ages to: (i) start working/supporting family; (ii) leave full-time education; (iii) get married and start living with a partner; (iv) have a child. Questions are also sourced from Young Lives (Favara et al., 2021).
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Within-survey randomization

For our estimates, we are going to compare outcomes of treated adolescents and caregivers with the control group’s outcomes to estimate treatment effects. We will estimate the following ordinary least squares regressions:
𝑌(i) = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1 𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 + 𝛽2X(i) + 𝜀!
Where:
𝑌(i) is the outcome of individual i, treated is the treatment status of individual i for the survey experiment, X is a vector capturing the
randomization strata within the original QP4G study and the adolescent intervention, and ε(i) is an individual error term. β1
captures our treatment effect.
We will also explore heterogeneity by selected axes, including:
• Adolescent, parent, and enumerator gender
• A measure of socioeconomic status (e.g. parent education or household poverty)
• Gender bias: Parental gender bias is measured by asking if parents agree or disagree
with the following statement: It is important that sons have more education than
daughters.
• Parental social desirability bias: as measured by Crowne and Marlowe (1960); in 2026, we have also measured adolescent social desirability bias

Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Within-survey randomization done via Stata dofile
Randomization Unit
Adolescent/caregiver (2023-24 round)
Adolescent only (2026 round)
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
~2,500 adolescents, ~2,500 parents. The final number may vary based on how many parents and adolescents we will recruit.
Sample size: planned number of observations
~2,500 adolescents, ~2,500 parents. The final number may vary based on how many parents and adolescents we will recruit.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
~1,250 adolescents comparison, ~1,250 parent comparison, ~1,250 adolescents treatment, ~1,250 parent treatment.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Barcelona
IRB Approval Date
2023-05-11
IRB Approval Number
N/A
IRB Name
Ghana Health Services
IRB Approval Date
2023-11-06
IRB Approval Number
005/07/23