Goal Setting and the Value of Work

Last registered on December 06, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Goal Setting and the Value of Work
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012518
Initial registration date
November 27, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 06, 2023, 8:03 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Nottingham

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-11-28
End date
2024-01-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The realm of goal setting has been a focal point of academic research for decades, with numerous studies emphasising its profound impact on motivation and performance. However, a subtle understanding of how males and females respond differently to goal setting and its associated consequences warrants deeper exploration. This experimental research investigates the gendered nuances of goal setting, emphasising the potential differential responses to altered goal outcomes, especially in light of the broader literature on the meaning of work. Existing literature suggests that individuals seek a meaning attached to their jobs. They tend to prefer working on projects that extend beyond mere financial compensation. This preference is often more pronounced among females who tend to gravitate towards work featuring social interaction and helping others. While males may also appreciate the social impact of work, they are mainly motivated by achievement-oriented factors such as competition and promotion. This distinction may underscore the inherent differences in how each gender perceives and responds to goals.
In this research, we aim to enrich the concept of goal setting by infusing it with a layer of meaning. Specifically, our study introduces the concept of “meaningful goals” by linking individual performance goals with charitable contributions. Participants will set performance goals that have consequences not only for themselves but also for a charitable cause. We hypothesise that this meaningful goal setting intervention will increase performance compared to a standard goal setting intervention or a no-goal condition. Moreover, given their strong inclination toward social impact and helping others in their work preferences, we hypothesise that females may derive even more significant benefits from the meaningful goal setting intervention than their male counterparts. This research contributes to understanding how gender differences intersect with goal setting and the value individuals place on goal consequences. By exploring the impact of meaningful goal setting, we aim to shed light on innovative ways to enhance motivation and performance, ultimately empowering individuals to achieve their goals more effectively.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Alandijany, Basim. 2023. "Goal Setting and the Value of Work." AEA RCT Registry. December 06. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12518-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Subjects will be invited to participate in an online experiment consisting of two parts (i.e., Day 1 and Day 2). The primary objective of Day 1 is to measure control variables and randomly allocate participants into four different experimental groups, as detailed in the following section. Day 2 is a week apart and is designed mainly to observe the subjects’ performance in a real-effort task. The real-effort task is to count zeros in 6x5 matrices of random zeros and ones. The subjects will have up to 24 hours and can choose how much effort they would like to spend on the task.
Experimental Groups:
The study employs a 2x2 experimental design, resulting in four distinct groups:
- Control Group (No goal setting, No donation): Subjects in this group will not be instructed to set a goal and will not receive any information about charitable donations on Day1.
- Donation-Only Group (No goal setting, Donation):
Subjects’ performance will be linked to charitable donations, but on Day1, they will not be instructed to set a goal for their performance.
- Goal Setting Group (Goal setting, No donation): On Day1, subjects will be asked to set a goal for their performance, but they will not receive any information about charitable donations.
- Meaningful Goal Group (Goal setting, Donation):
Subjects in this group will set a performance goal on Day 1, and their performance will be linked to charitable donations.
Intervention Start Date
2023-11-28
Intervention End Date
2024-01-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
To experimentally investigate whether infusing meaning to goals through charitable donations can enhance performance, and potential gender differences.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Subjects will be invited to participate in an online experiment consisting of two parts (i.e., Day 1 and Day 2). The primary objective of Day 1 is to measure control variables and randomly allocate participants into four different experimental groups, as detailed in the following section. Day 2 is a week apart and is designed mainly to observe the subjects’ performance in a real-effort task. The real-effort task is to count zeros in 6x5 matrices of random zeros and ones. The subjects will have up to 24 hours and can choose how much effort they would like to spend on the task.
Experimental Groups:
The study employs a 2x2 experimental design, resulting in four distinct groups:
- Control Group (No goal setting, No donation): Subjects in this group will not be instructed to set a goal and will not receive any information about charitable donations on Day1.
- Donation-Only Group (No goal setting, Donation):
Subjects’ performance will be linked to charitable donations, but on Day1, they will not be instructed to set a goal for their performance.
- Goal Setting Group (Goal setting, No donation): On Day1, subjects will be asked to set a goal for their performance, but they will not receive any information about charitable donations.
- Meaningful Goal Group (Goal setting, Donation):
Subjects in this group will set a performance goal on Day 1, and their performance will be linked to charitable donations.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
The randomisation will be stratified by gender and the self-control measure. This will be done by using Qualtrics.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
200
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
50 individuals for each group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Nottingham School of Economics Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2023-10-18
IRB Approval Number
N/A

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials