Contracts and Performance Beliefs

Last registered on December 20, 2023

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Contracts and Performance Beliefs
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012679
Initial registration date
December 12, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 20, 2023, 12:46 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Technical University Munich

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Michigan

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-12-11
End date
2025-01-15
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
We study beliefs about the impact of gender and race on workers' performance under different compensation rules.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Drobner, Christoph and Yesim Orhun. 2023. "Contracts and Performance Beliefs." AEA RCT Registry. December 20. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12679-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2023-12-11
Intervention End Date
2025-01-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Belief Fixed - Gender Comparison
Belief Comparative (Top 10%) - Gender Comparison
Belief Comparative (Top 50%) - Gender Comparison

Belief Fixed - Asian/Hispanic Comparison
Belief Comparative (Top 10%) - Asian/Hispanic Comparison
Belief Comparative (Top 50%) - Asian/Hispanic Comparison

Belief Fixed - Asian/Black Comparison
Belief Comparative (Top 10%) - Asian/Black Comparison
Belief Comparative (Top 50%) - Asian/Black Comparison
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Participants will be asked to form beliefs about a group of US participants (henceforth workers) on Prolific, who worked on up to 25 decoding tasks under three compensation rules:

1) Fixed: Workers received a payment of $2, regardless of how many decoding tasks they solved correctly.
2) Comparative (top 10%): Workers received a fixed payment of $1, regardless of how many decoding tasks they solved correctly. In addition, they received an additional bonus of $10 if their performance was among the top 2 in a comparison group of 20 participants (including them) who worked on the same tasks.
3) Comparative (top 50%): Workers received a fixed payment of $1, regardless of how many decoding tasks they solve correctly. In addition, they received an additional bonus of $2 if their performance was among the top 10 in a comparison group of 20 participants (including them) who worked on the same tasks.

Participants will be asked to form probabilistic beliefs about the relative performance of different gender and race for each of the three compensation rules. We incentivize the belief reports with the binarized scoring rule without providing detailed information about the incentives (as in Danz et al., 2022). Participants know that they have the chance to win a $2 bonus, and the chance of winning this bonus increases with the accuracy of their belief reports.

In the gender comparison, participants will be asked to report beliefs about the relative likelihood that the average performance level is higher among men or women for each of the 3 compensation rules. In the race comparison, participants will be asked to report beliefs about the relative likelihood that the average performance level is higher among Asian or Hispanic/Black (randomized in a between-subjects design) workers for each of the 3 compensation rules. In a between-subjects design, we will randomize the order of asking for gender or race comparisons, as well as the labeling the belief elicitation scale (e.g., men---women vs. women--men). The randomization is stratified across participant gender and Part A payoffs.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done by Qualtrics
Randomization Unit
Individual level randomization
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
No
Sample size: planned number of observations
≈1000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
≈250 gender first, Asian/Hispanic second
≈250 gender first, Asian/Black second
≈250 Asian/Hispanic first, gender second
≈250 Asian/Black first, gender second
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number