Understanding Teacher Decision-Making: Parent-Teacher Alignment in Multidimensional Skill Development

Last registered on March 12, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Understanding Teacher Decision-Making: Parent-Teacher Alignment in Multidimensional Skill Development
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012755
Initial registration date
December 26, 2023

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
January 02, 2024, 10:56 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
March 12, 2025, 5:14 PM EDT

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Columbia University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-01-06
End date
2025-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
I study the potential of enhancing parent-teacher communication to improve the development of student well-being by focusing on a more holistic view of human capital. I aim to expand the traditional focus on cognitive skills, typically measured by standardized test scores, to include non-cognitive skills that are vital for students' social and emotional development. I study the hypothesis that discrepancies in the prioritization of these skills between parents and teachers may lead to inefficient allocation of teacher effort. Specifically, I propose an intervention where information on parent preferences regarding the relative importance of various human capital dimensions is systematically provided to teachers. Parents are surveyed to gauge their preferences across a comprehensive range of human capital aspects, which include cognitive, social, and emotional capabilities. Concurrently, teachers are surveyed to understand their perceptions and the degree to which they believe these align with the parents’ preferences. I estimate the impact on student outcomes, teacher beliefs, as well as parent satisfaction. This study will be carried out in elementary and middle school classrooms in India, characterized by high student-to-teacher ratios, where personal knowledge of students might be limited due to structural constraints. The expectation is that by informing teachers about student needs, proxied by parent preferences, this study could reveal a cost-effective method for nurturing holistic student development, with implications for educational systems looking to integrate non-cognitive skill growth alongside academic learning.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Kundu, Tushar. 2025. "Understanding Teacher Decision-Making: Parent-Teacher Alignment in Multidimensional Skill Development." AEA RCT Registry. March 12. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12755-2.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention is an information treatment delivered through a custom website (wiseteaching.net). Treated teachers receive:

Individual student reports showing parent preferences and current ability ratings (0-100) across nine dimensions of human capital grouped into academic, social, and emotional categories
Classroom-level summaries of parent priorities
Pedagogical strategies for improving non-cognitive skills based on feedback from teachers

Teachers access this information through individual login credentials that limit their access to only their classroom's data. The information intervention reduces uncertainty about parent preferences but does not change the weight teachers place on parent preferences or their own preferences.
Intervention (Hidden)
The intervention is an information treatment delivered through a custom website (wiseteaching.net). Treated teachers receive:

Individual student reports showing parent preferences and current ability ratings (0-100) across nine dimensions of human capital grouped into academic, social, and emotional categories
Classroom-level summaries of parent priorities
Pedagogical strategies for improving non-cognitive skills based on feedback from teachers

Teachers access this information through individual login credentials that limit their access to only their classroom's data. The information intervention reduces uncertainty about parent preferences but does not change the weight teachers place on parent preferences or their own preferences.
Intervention Start Date
2024-04-30
Intervention End Date
2025-03-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Teacher belief updating:
Correlation between teacher beliefs about parent preferences and actual parent preferences

Student academic outcomes:
School-provided grades in academic subjects
Student attendance rates

Student non-cognitive outcomes:
Parent ratings (0-100) of child's abilities across nine dimensions of human capital
Teacher assessments of student capabilities in social and emotional domains (report card)

Teaching practices:
Self-reported teacher implementation of suggested pedagogical strategies
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Teacher belief updating is measured by the correlation between teachers' perceptions of parent preferences and actual parent preferences. I examine how this correlation changes after the intervention for treatment versus control teachers. Higher correlation indicates more accurate teacher understanding of what parents want for their children.

For student outcomes, I use:
Academic performance comes directly from school-provided grades and attendance records
Non-cognitive skills are measured through parent ratings on a 0-100 scale for nine dimensions of human capital grouped into academic, social, and emotional categories

Parent and teacher outcomes are captured through:
Current ability ratings: Parents rate each student's current abilities across nine skill dimensions on a 0-100 scale
Importance rankings: Both groups rank which skills they consider most important for the student to improve (a subset for teachers)

For teaching practices, I collect self-reported data on:
Implementation of pedagogical strategies (for the treatment group)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study will be done in conjunction with four schools in four states across India. Schools will administer surveys for teachers and parents of students from 1st to 10th grade. Within each grade, students are grouped into sections, each of which is associated with a class teacher. Each section has approximately 30-40 students. Students will also be surveyed at endline.

Within the largest school in the sample, there are an average of 10 sections in each grade (100 total sections), and each section contains approximately 40 students (~4000 students total). In the smallest school, there are 3-4 sections in each grade, totaling ~1100 students. Across the schools, there are ~8150 student-parent pairs.

Having completed the baseline surveys, I have collected responses from ~3,300 student-parent pairs, representing 43.5% of the full student body.

The experiment randomizes at the classroom (teacher) level following a two-stage design:

1. Random split of grades with either odd or even grades getting information on pedagogical strategies
2. Within each group:
• Grades that get strategy info: 80% receive parent preferences and ratings information
• Grades that do not get strategy info: 20% receive parent preferences and ratings information

This design minimizes the threat of spillovers by assuming teachers within a grade communicate, thus assigning strategy information at the grade level, while parent information is specific to each class. The within-grade randomization proportions were chosen to maximize the power for comparing control and the combined treatment with both strategy and parent information.

Data collection occurs across multiple waves. Baseline surveys took place in April 2024 for the first school, and in September 2024 for the three other schools. The information treatment began in the week after the baseline surveys were completed for teachers. Endline surveys will take place in April 2025 for all schools, with a follow-up wave planned for August 2025. The timing aligns with the Indian academic calendar, with academic years starting in April.
Experimental Design Details
This study will be done in conjunction with four schools in four states across India. Schools will administer surveys for teachers and parents of students from 1st to 10th grade. Within each grade, students are grouped into sections, each of which is associated with a class teacher. Each section has approximately 30-40 students. Students will also be surveyed at endline.

Within the largest school in the sample, there are an average of 10 sections in each grade (100 total sections), and each section contains approximately 40 students (~4000 students total). In the smallest school, there are 3-4 sections in each grade, totaling ~1100 students. Across the schools, there are ~8150 student-parent pairs.

Having completed the baseline surveys, I have collected responses from ~3,300 student-parent pairs, representing 43.5% of the full student body.

The experiment randomizes at the classroom (teacher) level following a two-stage design:

1. Random split of grades with either odd or even grades getting information on pedagogical strategies
2. Within each group:
• Grades that get strategy info: 80% receive parent preferences and ratings information
• Grades that do not get strategy info: 20% receive parent preferences and ratings information

This design minimizes the threat of spillovers by assuming teachers within a grade communicate, thus assigning strategy information at the grade level, while parent information is specific to each class. The within-grade randomization proportions were chosen to maximize the power for comparing control and the combined treatment with both strategy and parent information.

Data collection occurs across multiple waves. Baseline surveys took place in April 2024 for the first school, and in September 2024 for the three other schools. The information treatment began in the week after the baseline surveys were completed for teachers. Endline surveys will take place in April 2025 for all schools, with a follow-up wave planned for August 2025. The timing aligns with the Indian academic calendar, with academic years starting in April.
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Treatment is clustered at the classroom (section) level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
240 classrooms
Sample size: planned number of observations
3300 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
96 classrooms control, 24 classrooms receive strategy information, 24 classrooms receive parent preferences and ratings, 96 classrooms receive both
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Columbia University
IRB Approval Date
2023-12-19
IRB Approval Number
AAAU7722
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials