Informational Experiment on Consumer's Perception of Central Bank Digital Currency as Liquidity Assets

Last registered on April 16, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Informational Experiment on Consumer's Perception of Central Bank Digital Currency as Liquidity Assets
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012893
Initial registration date
April 04, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 16, 2024, 11:17 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
PI Affiliation
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2024-03-27
End date
2024-04-08
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study explores how consumers perceive Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in comparison with traditional financial instruments, focusing on the dual role of CBDC as a liquidity asset and a payment method. Through a survey experiment conducted with 3,000 participants, we investigate the distinction between CBDC as a liquidity asset versus a payment method and how awareness of its security and ecosystem might alter consumer preferences and usage patterns.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Dordal i Carreras, Marc , Si Yuan Jin and Kohei Kawaguchi. 2024. "Informational Experiment on Consumer's Perception of Central Bank Digital Currency as Liquidity Assets." AEA RCT Registry. April 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12893-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The control group and treatment groups differ in the choice sets in the questions; e-HKD is included in the choice set for the treatment groups but not for the control group when we ask for their allocation of liquidity assets and choice of payment methods. Three treatment groups differ in the information provided at the beginning of the survey.
Intervention Start Date
2024-03-27
Intervention End Date
2024-04-08

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The survey includes five categories of questions. First, we ask about their perception of liquidity assets. Second, we ask about their perception of payment methods. Third, we ask for their allocation of liquidity across liquidity assets. Fourth, we ask for their choice of funding method for each payment method. Last, we ask for their choice of payment method in various transaction situations.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We survey a representative sample of 3,000 people from Hong Kong. The survey includes five categories of questions. First, we ask about their perception of liquidity assets. Second, we ask about their perception of payment methods. Third, we ask for their allocation of liquidity across liquidity assets. Fourth, we ask for their choice of funding method for each payment method. Last, we ask for their choice of payment method in various transaction situations.

We randomly assign the sample into four groups of size 750: control, plain treatment, security-perception-enhanced treatment, and ecosystem-enhanced treatment. The control group and treatment groups differ in the choice sets in the questions; e-HKD is included in the choice set for the treatment groups but not for the control group when we ask for their allocation of liquidity assets, choice of liquidity assets, and choice of payment methods. The control group and plain treatment group have the same information provided. Three treatment groups differ in the information provided at the beginning of the survey.

In the plain treatment and control group, e-HKD is explained as a digital asset that is free from default risk.

In the security-enhanced treatment group, in addition to this, it is stressed that e-HKD accounts and transaction records are managed in a regulated secure system operated by commercial and central banks like a bank deposit in the savings/current account of a bank. It is intended to give the impression that e-HKD is more secure and regulated than other non-bank commercial money.

In the ecosystem-perception-enhanced treatment group, in addition to this, it is emphasized that e-HKD will have an ecosystem like that of a bank deposit that enables payment in any situation like salary receipt, tax payment, and securities settlement. It is intended to give the impression that e-HKD is not merely money for retail payment, but will be an infrastructure of the entire payment system as well as bank deposit in the existing payment system.

We have two random parameters for respondents. This variation is aimed to identify the price elasticity of liquidity asset holding and payment method choice. In questions 17 to 20, we have bank deposit interest rates XX%. XX is sampled from the uniform distribution [0, 0.3] (Over the past five years, the average annual interest rate for bank deposits has hovered at approximately 0.15%.). The interest rates are the same for all mentioned questions within each respondent's answers, meaning that only one XX needs to be sampled for one respondent. In questions 21 to 29, we have credit card cashback rates ZZ%. ZZ is sampled from the uniform distribution [0, 4] (The average credit card cashback rate for major banks is 2%.) The cashback rates are the same for all mentioned questions within each respondent's answers, meaning that only one ZZ needs to be sampled for one respondent.

Before conducting the main experiment, we carry out a pilot study with a sample size of 100 participants. After running the pilot study, we observe the results and modify the questionnaire. Then, we submit the revised design and pre-analysis plan to the AEA Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Registry.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
The sampling is conducted by a third-party survey company with randomization done in their computers.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3,000 individuals.
Sample size: planned number of observations
3,000 individuals.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
We randomly assign the sample into four groups of size 750: control, plain treatment, security-perception-enhanced treatment, and ecosystem-perception-enhanced treatment.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Secretariat of Human and Artefacts Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2024-01-23
IRB Approval Number
HREP-2023-0454
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

Experimental design and analysis plan

MD5: 4ab8d40082b04ff9ece268063da9a546

SHA1: ca8c259671960869fd19cd448b598dc9a4d1f193

Uploaded At: April 04, 2024

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials