Women's empowerment and east coast fever vaccination decision

Last registered on March 15, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Women's empowerment and east coast fever vaccination decision
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0012971
Initial registration date
March 08, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 15, 2024, 6:34 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Washington State University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-02-26
End date
2024-06-26
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The challenges and opportunities in livestock farming are different for women smallholder farmers compared to the men influencing individual empowerment and consequently impacting food-security, well-being and livelihood. In several countries, women are primary producers of food and tend to control vital livestock products to produce the same. Studies have demonstrated that women are primary caregivers of cattle, thus empowering women in livestock health decisions can benefit households and communities, as their unique perspectives and skills can contribute to disease prevention and overall livestock management.

This study aims to investigate the relationship between women empowerment and cattle health management using a lab in the field experiment. The experiment is scheduled to take place from February to May 2024 in Narok county, Kenya. The preliminary data of this experiment is expected to come by mid April. Participants will take part in a multi-stage exercise administered using a customised app developed in otree. The sampling strategy would include recruiting participants that are born female, married, and actively engaging in daily livestock activities. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups, indicative of different empowerment levels, ensuring a rigorous assessment of the anticipated effects on decision dynamics and household outcomes. The experiment will progress through two stages, comprising a total of six rounds, effectively reproducing a decision-making process related to hypothetical calf vaccination, milk production, and potential animal sales. At the end, payments will be provided to participants based on their performance and decisions made throughout the experiment. The level of empowerment will be defined based on two dimensions of Women's Empowerment Livestock Index (WELI). They are related to involvement and autonomy in decision-making regarding cattle ownership activities and the control of revenue from cattle production activities such as milk. The decomposability of the index will allows this study to overtly observe the extent of rights related to decision making over assets can impact outcomes. Additionally based on the definition of empowerment the study is able to isolate reverse causality such that choices do not have an impact on the level of autonomy.

This study contributes to the literature in following ways. It contributes to the body of literature on gender and intra-household decision-making for animal health management through engagement in livestock. It examines the causal impact of women's empowerment as defined in the experiment on individual well being due to hypothetical ECF vaccine adoption. In addition, it also contributes methodologically, by employing an innovative lab in the field experimental exercise to elicit preferences and overtly observing the decision making process. Lastly, in order to get a proxy for household bargaining power this study uniquely defines empowerment using two dimensions of WELI, a topic which has previously not been given much consideration in past animal health management studies.

This experiment will provide participants with information about ECF management and contribute to the literature on gender specific technological adoption differences in animal health decision-making in rural communities. The findings from this research will provide insights on the impact of women's empowerment on ECF vaccination decisions, potentially guiding policy interventions to enhance vaccination uptake and improve livestock health outcomes. The findings will not only have direct implications on outcomes like milk production, calving intervals, and mortality rates, but also influence indirect outcomes such as poverty levels and the health and nutrition of mothers and children. This experiment also aligns with broader efforts and draws inspiration from successful women's empowerment policies and programs in the livestock sector. Understanding the factors influencing women's decisions regarding ECF vaccination further aligns with the broader goal of promoting sustainable livestock production and rural development.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Surve, Aditi. 2024. "Women's empowerment and east coast fever vaccination decision." AEA RCT Registry. March 15. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.12971-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2024-02-26
Intervention End Date
2024-06-26

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Number of hypothetical calves chosen to vaccinate, Points earned in the game, Number of hypothetical cows sold
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This paper investigates the relationship between women empowerment and individual and household well being in the context of adoption of ECF vaccines using a lab in the field experiment. Participants will take part in a multi-stage exercise administered using a customised app developed in otree. Participants will be randomly assigned to various groups, indicative of different empowerment levels, ensuring a rigorous assessment of the anticipated effects on decision dynamics and household outcomes. The experiment will progress through two stages, comprising a total of six rounds, effectively reproducing a decision-making process over the duration of the study. Clear and precise instructions will be provided to the participants, followed by comprehensive training sessions, preparing them for tasks related to calf vaccination, milk production, and potential animal sales. At the end, payments will be provided to participants based on their performance and decisions made throughout the experiment.

Participants will be stratified based on herd size and gender of the household head. Participants will then be randomly assigned into one of the three groups for the exercise. They will continue to hold the same status throughout the experiment. The random assignment of empowerment status will be as the following:

Group A: Complete control over the purchase and sale of the animal (including the money spent or received. Complete control of the money that is generated from sale of cattle; also in charge of cattle activities related to purchase, giving away as gift, using the cattle as collateral.) and control over the milk produced by cows, how it is used, or money received from its sale.( Complete control of what to do with money that gets generated from sale of products, here milk, obtained from cattle.)

Group B: Complete control over the milk produced by calves, how it is used, and money received from its sale; but no control over the purchase and sale of the animal or the money spent on purchase or received from sale.

Group C: No control over the milk produced by calves, how it is used, and money received from its sale; but complete control over the purchase and sale of the animal or the money spent on purchase or received from sale.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Done in office by computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3 groups
Sample size: planned number of observations
700 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
230 individuals per group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
KENYA MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
IRB Approval Date
2021-11-25
IRB Approval Number
KEMRI/SERU/CPHR/027/4314