Understanding the Barriers to Paternity Leave Taking: Evidence from Japan

Last registered on April 16, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Understanding the Barriers to Paternity Leave Taking: Evidence from Japan
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013058
Initial registration date
February 19, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 16, 2024, 3:54 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
National University of Singapore

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Chicago
PI Affiliation
Boston University
PI Affiliation
University of Tokyo
PI Affiliation
Government of Japan - Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2023-10-01
End date
2026-07-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Japan has one of the most generous parental leave policies for working parents, yet male employees remain reluctant to take leave. In 2021, only 14% of eligible Japanese fathers took at least one day of paternity leave, and conditional on taking leave, most men take less than two weeks of leave. Men’s reluctance to take paternity leave in Japan has been attributed to several factors such as the prevalence of traditional gender norms that are at odds with men taking on a caregiving role, career concerns surrounding the violation of ideal worker norms, and organizational climate and support for leave-taking. Recent work suggests that even as social norms change, individuals may actively enforce a perceived norm, even if they privately reject the norm because they incorrectly believe that most other people continue to support the norm. In such settings, information about others’ beliefs could help to address underlying misperceptions and speed up the evolution of norms.

This project aims to study the barriers to paternity leave-taking among Japanese men focusing on the role of male employee beliefs about prevailing norms surrounding paternity leave-taking, employer support for leave-taking, and the perceived career impacts of taking paternity leave. Specifically, we will examine whether Japanese men accurately perceive the social norms surrounding paternity leave-taking among various groups that likely matter, as well as employers’ perceptions of the career impacts of paternity leave-taking. We will then assess the impacts of information treatments aimed at addressing misperceptions about others’ beliefs on attitudes and willingness to take-up paternity leave.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bertrand, Marianne et al. 2024. "Understanding the Barriers to Paternity Leave Taking: Evidence from Japan." AEA RCT Registry. April 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13058-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Providing information on the extent of support for paternity-leave taking among various groups (e.g., peers, older generation, employers) and managers’ beliefs about the career impacts of paternity leave-taking to Japanese men.
Intervention Start Date
2024-03-08
Intervention End Date
2024-08-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We will conduct two survey experiments among Japanese men to study how information provision about the extent of others’ support and managers’ beliefs about the career impacts of paternity leave-taking affects their attitudes and willingness to take-up paternity leave. Our experimental design will allow us to assess the extent to which misperceptions about the extent of support among various groups (e.g., peers vs. managers) contributes to the low level of paternity-leave taking among Japanese men.

The first survey experiment targets a representative sample of married men who are currently employed. Our outcomes of interest include:
(1) Likelihood of encouraging a male friend who is about to have a child to take different durations of paternity/childcare leave within the first year of the child’s birth. Specifically, we will present a hypothetical scenario about a male friend who is similar in age and education and working for a similar type of company and is deciding about whether to take paternity leave. We will then ask participants, “What advice would you give your friend, specifically, what is the percent chance (or chances out of 100) that you would encourage him to take 0 days, < 1 week, 1 to 2 weeks, 2 weeks to 1 month, > 3 months, of paternity leave.”

Analysis: Comparing this outcome across the control and treatment groups will provide an estimate of the impact of the information treatment on participants’ attitudes toward paternity leave-taking.

(2) For participants who are planning to have a child in the near future, we will ask the likelihood that they will take paternity leave of various durations within the first year of the child’s birth.

Analysis: Comparing this outcome across the control and treatment groups will provide an estimate of the impact of the information treatment on participants’ intended behavior.

(3) Beliefs about the career impacts of taking paternity leave and managers’ support of paternity leave-taking among their subordinates.

Analysis: Comparing these outcomes across the control and treatment groups will provide an estimate of how beliefs update as a result of the information treatment.

The second survey experiment targets a representative sample of married men who expect/plan to have a baby in the next year (the survey company we are working with has access to such a sample of to-be fathers). We will survey this group of married men at least twice, once before they have a child (baseline survey), and another time a year later after they have had a child (follow-up survey). Funds permitting, we will survey them a third time two years later.

The information treatment will be embedded in the baseline survey, and the outcome of interest will be intended paternity leave-taking behavior. In the follow-up survey, the outcome of interest will be participants’ actual (self-reported) leave-taking behavior. To study belief updating, we will also re-ask questions on participants’ beliefs about the extent of others’ support for paternity-leave taking as well as the career impacts of taking paternity-leave.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
For the first survey experiment, participants will be randomly assigned into a control group and four treatment groups. The treatment groups will receive varying sets of information about peer support for paternity-leave taking, managers’ support, and managers’ beliefs about the career impacts of taking paternity-leave.

The experimental set-up for the second survey experiment will be similar, with the exact number of treatments groups and the information provided to each group to be determined based on the findings in the first survey experiment (we will update pre-analysis plan accordingly prior to the roll-out of this experiment).

The information provided to the participants will be obtained from surveys of attitudes and beliefs surrounding paternity leave-taking that we conduct prior to the survey experiments. These “pre-intervention” surveys will be conducted on representative samples of the individuals and managers. These surveys will be used to establish the attitudes surrounding paternity leave-taking in Japan among various groups of individuals and the accuracy of perceptions of others’ beliefs. We will survey married/unmarried men and women between the ages of 25 to 49, older men and women aged 55 and above, as well as middle managers and upper-level managers across a representative set of industries.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done by the survey company.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
For the first survey experiment, we plan to target up to 5,000 married men between the ages of 25 to 49 who are employed in companies or the government. For the second survey experiment, we plan to target up to 8,000 men who expect/plan to have a child sometime in the next year.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Experiment 1: 1,000 in each treatment arm (1 control group, 4 treatment arms)

Experiment 2: 2,000 in each treatment arm at baseline (1 control group, 3 treatment arms). Expect attrition in the follow-up sample, with a target sample size of ~800 for the follow-up.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Tokyo
IRB Approval Date
2024-02-09
IRB Approval Number
23-547