Motivating Students: Exploring the Effect of Incentives on Test Scores

Last registered on March 15, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Motivating Students: Exploring the Effect of Incentives on Test Scores
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013078
Initial registration date
March 04, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 15, 2024, 3:10 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Fordham University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-01-15
End date
2024-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This paper implements a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) among school children in Bangladesh to examine the impact of monetary and non-monetary incentives on student performance. In doing so, it provides comprehensive insights into the multifaceted relationship between incentives, student motivation, and academic performance in Bangladesh.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Hossain, Ridwan. 2024. "Motivating Students: Exploring the Effect of Incentives on Test Scores." AEA RCT Registry. March 15. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13078-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Student effort is a crucial input in a child’s learning production function. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of monetary and non-monetary incentives on student performance.
Intervention (Hidden)
This paper implements a Randomized Control Trial (RCT) among school children in Bangladesh to examine the impact of monetary and non-monetary incentives on student performance. Students are randomly assigned to one of six groups, with the initial five groups receiving various incentives—financial rewards and non-financial rewards (in both gain and loss settings), and social recognition. The sixth group serves as an unincentivized control. All participating students undergo assessments, including a timed evaluation that specifically evaluates critical thinking, pattern-based comprehension, and quantitative problem-solving skills, linked to the incentives. The primary goal is to understand how incentives, framed in gain setting and loss setting, contribute to student motivation and academic achievement. Additionally, I will investigate the persistent effects of incentives by examining student performance after the incentives are removed. This study will provide comprehensive insights into the complex relationship between incentives, student motivation, and academic performance among children in Bangladesh.
Intervention Start Date
2024-01-15
Intervention End Date
2024-05-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Test scores
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
See PAP.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Students will be randomly assigned to different treatment variations to capture the impact of different types of incentives on test scores.
Experimental Design Details
Students will be randomly assigned to one of six groups, with the initial five groups receiving incentives, and the sixth group serving as an unincentivized control group. In Treatment-1 (T1) and Treatment-2 (T2) students receive non-financial incentives in a gain and loss framing, respectively. Specifically, students achieving over 80% on a timed assessment in Treatment-1 receive a certificate of excellence and a congratulatory letter to their parents. In Treatment-2, participants receive the certificate and letter before the exam but are required to return them if they fail to score 80%. In Treatments 3 (T3) and 4 (T4) students receive monetary rewards in Bangladeshi Taka (BDT) 50 with gain and loss framing, respectively. In T3, students receive the cash award for scoring 80% or more, while in group T4, they receive the envelope beforehand, and must return it if they don't reach the 80% threshold. Next, Treatment-5 (T5) offers students social recognition by capturing pictures of high-performing students with a digital camera, immediately showcasing them on the school board for exemplary performances; students scoring over 80% also receive applause from classmates, enhancing their social image in school. Lastly, Treatment-6 (T6) serves as the control group, receiving no incentives for their performance in the timed assessment.
Randomization Method
The randomization process is done using chits within the school.
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
1230 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
205 in each treatment arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
See PAP.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Fordham University
IRB Approval Date
2023-12-11
IRB Approval Number
2424
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials