Gender and Electability: A Survey Experiment on Voter Beliefs and Information Acquisition

Last registered on April 02, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Gender and Electability: A Survey Experiment on Voter Beliefs and Information Acquisition
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013246
Initial registration date
March 25, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 02, 2024, 10:55 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
St. Lawrence University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Boston University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-03-26
End date
2024-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In this survey experiment, we investigate the belief formation of voting-age US adults on candidates' electability in congressional races.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
How Choon, Thea and Jiarui Wang. 2024. "Gender and Electability: A Survey Experiment on Voter Beliefs and Information Acquisition." AEA RCT Registry. April 02. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13246-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2024-03-26
Intervention End Date
2024-04-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Voter beliefs on candidate electability
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Voter beliefs are elicited through incentivized guesses about candidate poll rankings.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Political awareness/engagement, voting
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Political awareness/engagement and voting are self-reported by participants.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
In this survey experiment, we investigate the belief formation of voting-age US adults on candidates' electability in congressional races. Respondents' familiarity with congressional candidates is likely to vary depending on their level of political awareness and their proximity with the state in which candidates are running. There are three sets of hypotheses we would like to test. The first concerns respondents' perceptions and whether these are systematically incorrect. We also check how this varies with respondents' self-reported level of political awareness and sources of information. The second line of inquiry centers on respondents' information acquisition: when given the choice, which candidates respondents prefer to receive additional information on, and how this additional information affects their perceptions. The third question is whether voters’ political engagement is correlated with their perceptions on which candidates are viable, e.g. whether voters are discouraged by beliefs that their preferred candidates are unlikely to win.
Experimental Design Details
Our study takes the form of an online survey measuring voters' political awareness and knowledge. As part of this, we ask respondents to guess poll rankings of existing candidates in the 2024 elections. We randomly vary the framing of the question to place more or less emphasis on the importance and the competitive nature of the runoff race, as well as the perceived identity of the opponent (e.g. stating the name of the male incumbent or the female frontrunner from the opposing party). In addition, we allow respondents to make information-acquisition choices with respect to candidates and their characteristics by offering clickable options on the screen. We then again elicit respondents’ beliefs about the candidates based on the information they received. In addition to their baseline remuneration, participants are entered in a draw for a monetary prize of $25, with their chances increasing in their number of correct responses to incentivize them to guess correctly. Participants are asked to refrain from making use of google search, and time limits are used to deter such attempts. To measure political engagement, we ask respondents about their recent participation in activities such as attending political speeches, volunteering for or donating to campaigns, and we ask them whether they intend to vote. We also conduct list experiments focused on the link between (mis)perceptions and voter turnout.
Randomization Method
Randomization done by Qualtrics.
Randomization Unit
Individual respondent
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
60
Sample size: planned number of observations
60
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
60
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
St. Lawrence University IRB
IRB Approval Date
2024-02-26
IRB Approval Number
2024-06

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials