Back to History Current Version

Impact of Different Online Learning Modes on Student Performance and Engagement

Last registered on April 16, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Impact of Different Online Learning Modes on Student Performance and Engagement
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013258
Initial registration date
April 08, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 16, 2024, 1:15 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Yale Law School

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-04-15
End date
2024-05-06
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In today’s educational landscape, students are exposed to online learning on a daily basis. This study aims to address the effectiveness of different online teaching modes on students' performance and engagement. To explore this question, we will work with students who voluntarily enroll in the course American Contract Law I taught by Professor Ian Ayres at Yale Law School, offered in Coursera.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Ayres, Ian and Ji Young Kim. 2024. "Impact of Different Online Learning Modes on Student Performance and Engagement." AEA RCT Registry. April 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13258-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Students of a Coursera Contracts course will be randomly assigned to one of the five groups. In each group, the substantive content will remain the same – same words spoken and same words shown in powerpoint slides and photos, but the groups will differ with the visual image and voice of the professor. Here is a description of the specific groups:
• Control group: Students in this group will learn the course material by being shown the preexisting videos with the professor delivering the material throughout the course
• Treatment group 1: Students in this group will learn the course by being shown videos in which the professor is replaced by a black male avatar instructor.
• Treatment group 2: Students in this group will learn the course by being shown videos in which the professor is replaced by a black female avatar instructor.
• Treatment group 3: Students in this group will learn the course by being shown videos in which the professor is replaced by a white male avatar instructor.
• Treatment group 4: Students in this group will learn the course by being shown videos in which the professor is replaced by a white female avatar instructor.

The following list presents specific questions of interest along with the appropriate statistical approaches to studying them:
1. Do students perform better when they are taught by avatar instructors than when they are taught by the professor?

Method 1: OLS regression
• Dependent variable: students’ overall grade
• Independent variables:
- Whether they were taught by an avatar instructor or by the real professor
- Number of lessons passed
- Student characteristics (age, race, gender, level of education)

Method 2: OLS regression (This method allows us to see a more detailed effect of each of the treatment groups on the student outcome)
• Dependent variable: students’ overall grade
• Independent variables:
- A factor variable indicating which of the four avatar types (black male, black female, white male, white female) or the real professor they were taught by
- Number of lessons passed
- Student characteristics (age, race, gender, level of education)

2. Do students engage more when they are taught by avatar instructors than when they are taught by the professor?

Method 1: OLS/logistic regressions
• Dependent variable: number of lessons completed (can be replaced with other measures of engagement)
• Independent variables:
- Whether they were taught by an avatar instructor or by the real professor
- Number of lessons passed
- Student discussion participation rate
- Whether the student completed their learning goal
- Whether the student upgraded to receive the certificate
- Whether the student achieved a badge on the course
- Attrition rate
- Student characteristics (age, race, gender, level of education)
- Interaction of whether they were taught by an avatar instructor and a student characteristic. This would test for the heterogeneous treatment effects across the different levels of student characteristic.

Method 2: OLS/logistic regression (This method allows us to see a more detailed effect of each of the engagement groups on the student outcome)
• Dependent variable: number of lessons completed (can be replaced with other measures of engagement)
• Independent variables:
- A factor variable indicating which of the four avatar types (black male, black female, white male, white female) or the real professor they were taught by
- Number of lessons passed
- Student discussion participation rate
- Whether the student completed their learning goal
- Whether the student upgraded to receive the certificate
- Whether the student achieved a badge on the course
- Attrition rate
- Student characteristics (age, race, gender, level of education)

3. Do students who are taught by an avatar instructor of the same race or gender as them perform better or have better engagement outcomes than those who are taught by an avatar instructor of a different race or gender?

Method 1: OLS/logistic regressions (limit the sample to those taught by avatars only)
• Dependent variable: a measure of students’ performance or engagement (refer to the previous regression provisions)
• Independent variables:
- Student’s race (gender)
- Instructor’s race (gender)
- Interaction of student race (gender) and instructor race (gender). This would test for the
- Other relevant measures of student performance/engagement
- Student characteristics (age, level of education)


Method 2: OLS/logistic regressions
• Dependent variable: a measure of students’ performance or engagement (refer to the previous regression provisions)
• Independent variables:
• - Student’s race
- Student’s gender
- Instructor’s race
- Instructor’s gender
- Interaction of student race and instructor race
- Interaction of student gender and instructor gender
- Other relevant measures of student performance/engagement
- Student characteristics (age, level of education)
Intervention Start Date
2024-04-15
Intervention End Date
2024-05-06

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Measure of performance:
• overall grade
• number of lessons passed

Measures of engagement:
• number of lessons completed
• whether the student completed their learning goal
• students’ discussion participation (by count or rate)
• students' feedback on the course
• students' rating on the course
• whether the student left a comment for course feedback
• the amount of time between the student's initial enrollment and when they completed the course (or stopped working on the course if not completed)
• whether the student upgraded to receive a paid certificate for the course
• whether the student achieved a badge in the course
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study will be conducted within the framework of Professor Ian Ayres’ course American Contract Law I offered by Coursera, and will attempt to assess the impact of various modes of teaching on learning and engagement.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individual student
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
N/A
Sample size: planned number of observations
At least 500 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
At least 100 students per group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Yale University Institutional Review Board
IRB Approval Date
2024-03-25
IRB Approval Number
2000037137

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials