Building Business Networks to Strengthen the Economic and Social Integration of Urban Refugees

Last registered on December 18, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Building Business Networks to Strengthen the Economic and Social Integration of Urban Refugees
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013265
Initial registration date
July 05, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 08, 2024, 1:54 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Last updated
December 18, 2024, 7:48 PM EST

Last updated is the most recent time when changes to the trial's registration were published.

Locations

Region
Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Stanford University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Stanford University
PI Affiliation
Stanford University
PI Affiliation
Stanford University
PI Affiliation
Georgetown University
PI Affiliation
Georgetown University
PI Affiliation
Makerere University
PI Affiliation
International Rescue Committee
PI Affiliation
International Rescue Committee
PI Affiliation
Stanford University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-07-15
End date
2026-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
A key barrier to labor market integration for refugees – particularly refugees in urban, non-camp settings – is a lack of social and business networks. While a growing number of interventions focus on building refugees’ economic and human capital, we know little about what works to improve their social capital, which is critical for refugee self-reliance. This study is a randomized control trial testing whether an intervention aimed at expanding and diversifying networks can improve microenterprise success and social cohesion among urban refugees and vulnerable hosts in Uganda and Kenya. The intervention provides refugee and host entrepreneurs with business grants and randomly assigns them to small, fixed business groups – aimed at forging strong ties – or large, rotating business groups – aimed at forging weak ties – and varies the composition of the groups along nationality lines. The overall aim of connecting different entrepreneurs through business groups is to support self-employment, business formation, and social cohesion. Our key research questions are: (1) how can interventions support the development of business and social networks for refugees and nationals in urban markets of developing countries; (2) are these interventions effective at improving livelihood outcomes and social inclusion; and (3) what kinds of networks are more or less impactful at improving business and social outcomes?
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Adong, Annet et al. 2024. "Building Business Networks to Strengthen the Economic and Social Integration of Urban Refugees." AEA RCT Registry. December 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13265-1.3
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Study participants are randomly assigned to four treatment groups and two control groups. The treatment groups participate in a 10-week business group for a duration of 3 months. All groups, including the control groups, receive a business grant of around 435 USD. The grant is paid out for all groups except for the “pure control group” after week 7 (of 10) of the intervention. The smaller “pure control” receives the same business grant but the payment is delayed until after the endline.

For participants in the four treatment groups, we vary two key dimensions of the business networking groups: the interaction intensity (intensive vs. extensive) and the nationality composition (homogenous vs. mixed) of the group. We hold the gender constant within all groups (all group members are either male or female, no mixed groups). We also hold constant the content of the business networking groups as well as the frequency of meetings, although the composition and size of these groups varies. Each session is led by a trained facilitator. To facilitate participation, all participants receive a transportation stipend in the first week that funds travel within the city for all subsequent weeks. Individuals with children that require childcare receive a child care stipend.

While all groups are facilitated by a trained facilitator, the core idea is not to train skills or provide information but to act as a forum to get to know other people in a meaningful way, to solve problems together, to learn how important social capital and networks are, and to map and identify concrete opportunities to expand one’s networks. All business groups are structured into 10 substantive topics but all sessions involve group discussions, interactive exercises and information exchanges rather than a taught curriculum. For example, two weeks are dedicated to visiting the businesses of fellow participants in the training (in the intensive treatment arm) and to have a business fair showcasing their businesses (in the extensive treatment arm). The discussion and group exercises follow as closely as possible a similar structure across treatment arms to hold the learning itself constant and identify the effects of the network instead.

The following general topics will be covered:
Week 0: Introduction and logistics
Week 1: Value of networking
Week 2: Business set-up and growth
Week 3: Suppliers, creditors and capital
Week 4: Customers and marketing
Week 5: Field visit/ business fair
Week 6: Planning for the business grant and savings
Week 7: Crisis management and problem solving
Week 8: Field visit/ business fair
Week 9: Stress Management
Week 10: Next steps
Intervention Start Date
2024-09-01
Intervention End Date
2024-11-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Economic performance:
a. Business profits
b. Business ownership

2. Psychological well-being:
a. Life satisfaction
b. Self-efficacy

3. Social cohesion:
a. Trust in in-group and out-group nationalities
b. Outgroup interactions

4. Network expansion
a. Degree centrality
b. Network diversity
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Economic performance:
c. Customer base and diversity
d. Value of productive assets
e. Hours spent in business
f. Non-entrepreneurial income

2. Psychological well-being:
c. Locus of control

3. Social cohesion:
c. Support for progressive refugee policies
d. Outgroup friends

4. Networks
b. Clustering coefficient
c. Number of local bridges

1. Economic performance:
c. Customer base and diversity
d. Value of productive assets
e. Hours spent in business
f. Non-entrepreneurial income

2. Psychological well-being:
c. Locus of control

3. Social cohesion:
c. Support for progressive refugee policies
d. Outgroup friends

4. Networks
b. Clustering coefficient
c. Number of local bridges
d. Network diversity
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Study participants are randomly assigned to one of six groups:
(1) Treatment I: Cash grant + Intensive interaction, homogenous business group
(2) Treatment II: Cash grant + Intensive interaction, heterogeneous business group
(3) Treatment III: Cash grant + Extensive interaction, homogenous business group
(4) Treatment IV: Cash grant + Extensive interaction, heterogeneous business group
(5) Control I: Cash grant only
(6) Control II: "Pure" control group, with cash grants provided after 16 months (end of program)

Treatment I and II: 1360 participants in each city are grouped into intensive business groups of the same 8 members. Half of these groups consist of homogenous groups based on nationality and half of heterogeneous groups from mixed nationalities that include refugees and host community members. All small group settings are homogenous in terms of gender to facilitate engagement and attendance across groups with varying cultural norms and attitudes towards women and entrepreneurial activities. All members of a business group come from the same broad area in the city (6 areas in Nairobi, 5 divisions in Kampala). Overall, the implementing partner organizes 170 intensive business groups in each city.

Treatment III and IV: 1400 participants in each city are invited to attend extensive business groups. These groups consist of 60 changing participants that are split up into 3 subgroups of 20 participants randomly each week. Over the course of the 3 months implementation period, an individual participant will hence meet 59 other participants. In the homogenous treatment arm, these participants will always be from the same nationality and gender. Participants in the heterogenous arm are invited to business groups with different refugee nationalities and host community members of the same gender. The members of the business groups all come from the same area in the city. Overall, the implementing partner organizes around 24 rotating groups of 60 individuals in each city. Participants are encouraged by facilitators to exchange contact information and business cards.

Control groups: 620 individuals in each city are assigned to the delayed cash control group (1240 total). 620 individuals in each city are assigned to the cash only control group (1240 total).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization of individuals into treatment arms and business groups proceeded in a multi-stage algorithmic process. Nationality-, gender-, and location-specific groups are selected at random. Respondents to fill these groups are selected at random conditional on them fulfilling the group criteria. Randomization is done on a computer using statistical software (R).
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
No clustered assignment. 8,000 individuals total (refugees and hosts); 4,000 in Nairobi, Kenya, and 4,000 in Kampala, Uganda.
Sample size: planned number of observations
8,000 individuals total (refugees and hosts); 4,000 in Nairobi, Kenya, and 4,000 in Kampala, Uganda.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Treatment I (cash grant + intensive homogenous): 1360 (680 in Kampala, 680 in Nairobi)
Treatment II (cash grant + intensive mixed): 1360 (680 in Kampala, 680 in Nairobi)
Treatment III (cash grant + extensive homogenous): 1400 (700 in Kampala, 700 in Nairobi)
Treatment IV (cash grant + extensive mixed): 1400 (700 in Kampala, 700 in Nairobi)
Control 1 (cash grant only): 1240 (620 in Kampala, 620 in Nairobi)
Control 2 (pure control): 1240 (620 in Kampala, 620 in Nairobi)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The study is powered to detect the impact of networking business groups relative to the control group at USD 3.21 per month and for the probability of business ownership (binary) at 0.02.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Stanford University
IRB Approval Date
2024-02-26
IRB Approval Number
IRB-74026
IRB Name
Georgetown University
IRB Approval Date
2024-03-24
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

ReBuild PAP

MD5: 294f077831abd732dd6a6448425d49c5

SHA1: f5860498407f1a2035d637eabf3f0234b1e31561

Uploaded At: September 08, 2024