Locus of Control and Giving: The Roles of Situational Control Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Pivotality

Last registered on June 17, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Locus of Control and Giving: The Roles of Situational Control Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Pivotality
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013476
Initial registration date
April 23, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 17, 2024, 2:53 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
PI Affiliation
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
PI Affiliation
University of Alabama, Australian National University, and NBER

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-04-24
End date
2026-05-19
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We investigate how exogenous variations in uncertainty, pivotality, and situational control beliefs interact with locus of control in determining giving in two experimental games.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Andor, Mark A. et al. 2024. "Locus of Control and Giving: The Roles of Situational Control Beliefs, Uncertainty, and Pivotality." AEA RCT Registry. June 17. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13476-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2024-04-24
Intervention End Date
2024-05-19

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Donations/contributions in two different experimental games
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
The primary outcome variable will be the contributions to charity in the Threshold Game or to the public good in the Public Good Game.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Perceived likelihood that the own decision will be the pivotal factor leading to the additional donation of 500 EUR in the Threshold Game.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Incentivized experimental games within a survey
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization by the survey institute commissioned to conduct the survey
Randomization Unit
Individuals (respondents)
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
6000 respondents
Sample size: planned number of observations
6000 respondents
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
400 respondents
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information