Studying the latent demand of female labour

Last registered on May 13, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Studying the latent demand of female labour
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013493
Initial registration date
May 03, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 13, 2024, 12:01 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Michigan

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-01-21
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We explore one potential explanation for the low rate of female labor force participation in India: women’s willingness and/or ability to leave home to access economic opportunities. We provide women with an income-generating opportunity, and randomize the location of work: either from their homes or from a workshop in their village center. We then examine two potential mechanisms driving the differences in labor supply: complementarity of in-home activities with economic production, and negative social perceptions around women’s work.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Adhvaryu, Achyuta. 2024. "Studying the latent demand of female labour." AEA RCT Registry. May 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13493-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In the study, we focus on whether allowing women to work from home can induce them to participate in the labor force and increase their labor supply. The experiment involves offering work opportunities to women to produce crochet products. We implement a cross randomisation experimental design of 2 different interventions: 1) work from home vs work from workshop, 2) revelation treatment and control. Randomisation is conducted at the household level whereby participants from the same household will be alloted to the same arm.
Intervention Start Date
2024-03-07
Intervention End Date
2025-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcomes of interest are a) the absolute number of final items produced by each worker in a week; b) the number of hours worked by each worker in a day (self-reported);
Hypothesis, H1: Being assigned to the work from the home treatment arm will increase the number of items produced and the number of hours worked by each worker compared to being assigned to the work from the workshop arm.



Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
The second type of outcomes of interest that we will explore is productivity of each worker defined as the number of products produced by each worker per unit of time.
Hypothesis, H2: Being assigned to the work from the home treatment arm will increase worker’s productivity compared to being assigned to the work from the workshop arm.
Hypothesis, H3: Assignment to the revelation treatment group lowers women’s labor supply and productivity compared to assignment to the control (no revelation) group.
Hypothesis, H4: The work from home treatment will have a larger positive impact on labor supply and productivity for women whose partners are more opposed to women’s work than for women whose partners are more receptive to women working

The third type of outcomes of interest we will examine will derive from the time use patterns of the respondent and aims to capture the complementary nature of certain in- home activities with home production. We will include an indicator variable equal to 1 if a respondent performs home activities simultaneously with economic production, and 0 otherwise; and the total duration that a respondent multi-tasks between home activity and economic production.

Hypothesis (H5): Assignment to work from the home treatment arm increases the likelihood of multitasking between economic production and home activities compared to assignment to work in the workshop arm.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
In the study, we focus on whether allowing women to work from home can induce them to participate in the labor force and increase their labor supply. The experiment involves offering work opportunities to women to produce crochet products. We implement a cross randomisation experimental design of 2 different interventions: 1) work from home vs work from workshop, 2) revelation treatment and control. Randomisation is conducted at the household level whereby participants from the same household will be alloted to the same arm.

Each woman is randomly assigned to the following sub-groups as displayed in figure 1 for three weeks.
1. Home vs Workshop
The first randomisation involves work from home vs work from workshop. In the work from the workshop arm, women will be offered work opportunities in a workshop- center in the village to create crochet products. On the other hand, in the work from home arm, women will be offered the opportunity to work at home to produce the same crochet products.
2. Home vs Workshop
Participants who are randomly assigned to the ‘work from home’ and ‘work from workshop’ arm will be further cross-randomised into an identity-revelation sub-treatment. Half of the women in both the arms will be randomly assigned to the “revelation” (or treatment) arm. Women assigned to this arm will have their names displayed on posters around the village to encourage other women to join the program. On the other hand, in the “no revelation” (or control) arm, women’s names will not be put up on posters. The women whose information will be revealed will have prior knowledge of the revelation.

The primary purpose of this experiment is to understand whether a more flexible opportunity, which relaxes workers’ mobility constraints, affects female labor force participation rate and labor supply.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization will be done through STATA, a statistical software.
Randomization Unit
Randomization will be conducted at the household level i.e. all women belonging to the same household will be assigned to the same arm
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
500 women
Sample size: planned number of observations
500 women
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
250 in work from home arm, 250 in work from workshop arm and 250 assigned to the poster arm (half from each work from home and work from workshop arm)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Michigan
IRB Approval Date
2023-11-01
IRB Approval Number
HUM00149227