The impact of a robotics workshop on neurobiological mechanisms of executive and social functions in boys and girls: a longitudinal study.

Last registered on July 16, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
The impact of a robotics workshop on neurobiological mechanisms of executive and social functions in boys and girls: a longitudinal study.
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013499
Initial registration date
April 25, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 16, 2024, 2:25 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
UDP
PI Affiliation
Fundacion Kiri
PI Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
PI Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
PI Affiliation
Fundacion Kiri

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-03-18
End date
2025-04-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study addresses the potential impact of an Educational Robotics (ER) workshop on the development of executive functions and socioemotional skills, as well as neurobiological correlates, in children from vulnerable environments. Based on the premise that these skills are crucial for academic and social success, longitudinal research is proposed with 94 fourth-grade children, divided into intervention and control groups. Through pre- and post-intervention evaluations over the course of a school year, we seek not only to examine the immediate effects, but also to better understand their sustainability over time. In addition, the analysis will be complemented with administrative data to obtain a more complete perspective of the results. It is expected that this study will provide solid evidence on the effectiveness of RE interventions in vulnerable contexts, as well as relevant insights for the design of public policies and educational programs aimed at improving the comprehensive development of children at risk.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Aboitiz, Francisco et al. 2024. "The impact of a robotics workshop on neurobiological mechanisms of executive and social functions in boys and girls: a longitudinal study.." AEA RCT Registry. July 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13499-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
For school recruitment, the schools were contacted through the municipalities. Subsequently, with the database of schools available for the study, we performed randomization with the statistical program STATA to generate a treatment and control group of 2 schools in each experimental group. The number of schools needed for this study was calculated based on estimates of observations needed to observe statistical differences using the G*Power program. This sample size was calculated considering that repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with inter- and intra-subject factors will be performed, considering an effect size f 0.2, an alpha error of 0.05, a power of 0.95, two groups (intervention and control) and two measurement moments per group (pre and post-intervention). Considering that in most intervention studies there is a loss of participants for various reasons (in the educational context e.g. they change educational establishment), we considered recruiting 10% more than the calculated sample size (Gupta et al., 2016), reaching a final recruitment number of 94 children in fourth grade (9 to 10 years of age).
For this study, 94 children in fourth grade (~9 years) will be recruited and followed until seventh grade (~12 years). Half will participate in the intervention group (who will receive the robotics program) and the other half in the control group (who will not receive the robotics program). The children in the control group will receive a kit of school materials at the beginning of the year, which will be the equivalent of the robotics kit received by the children in the intervention group. The robotics program includes two weekly sessions of 90 minutes each, which are carried out during the whole school year within the school day, in which the children, through the learning of the essential elements and techniques of robotics, will work on executive functions and socioemotional skills. They will work with Lego robotics sets and curricular planning adapted for each grade where learning objectives of the discipline and social and emotional objectives are integrated. The program is taught per course group by a robotics instructor and a teacher from the school.

There will be a pre-intervention evaluation and four post-intervention evaluations separated by one school year. Behavioral and electroencephalographic data will be recorded at each evaluation.
Intervention Start Date
2024-04-15
Intervention End Date
2025-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Behavioral instruments are used to measure variables such as: motivation, purpose, self-efficacy, sense of belonging, self-esteem, teacher-student bond, attention and cognitive flexibility.
Las dimensiones de exploración de los registros electrofisiológicos son:
Cartas tiempo-frecuencia, que permiten analizar las diferentes oscilaciones cerebrales asociadas a ciertos procesos cognitivos
Análisis de conectividad funcional, que permite describir los patrones de interacción dentro y entre las diferentes regiones del cerebro
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The design is a quasi-experimental design that contemplates the collection of a baseline and four measurements at the end of each school year over a period of four years of implementation.
The sample size corresponds to a total of 84 participants, of which half will correspond to the intervention group (who will receive the robotics program) and the other half to the control group (who will not receive the robotics program).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Computer randomization
Randomization Unit
Schools accessing the implementation with a school vulnerability index (SVI) greater than or equal to 70% in the Metropolitan Region.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
4 schools
Sample size: planned number of observations
84 students
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
2 treatment group schools, 2 control group schools
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
For school recruitment, the schools were contacted through the municipalities. Subsequently, with the database of schools available for the study, we performed randomization with the statistical program STATA to generate a treatment and control group of 2 schools in each experimental group. The number of schools needed for this study was calculated based on estimates of observations needed to observe statistical differences using the G*Power program. This sample size was calculated considering that repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with inter- and intra-subject factors will be performed, considering an effect size f 0.2, an alpha error of 0.05, a power of 0.95, two groups (intervention and control) and two measurement moments per group (pre and post intervention). Only two measurements were considered in the calculation, given that the study seeks to provide knowledge from the first post-intervention assessment, given the relevance of finding effects that are not only statistically significant, but also scientifically distinctive, and then follow the effect of the intervention over time. Considering that in most intervention studies there is loss of participants for various reasons (in educational context e.g. they change educational establishment), we considered recruiting 10% more than the calculated sample size (Gupta et al., 2016), reaching a final recruitment number of 94 children in fourth grade (9 to 10 years old).
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Comité ético científico en Ciencias Sociales, Artes y Humanidades de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
IRB Approval Date
2024-01-16
IRB Approval Number
230405010
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information