Intrahousehold differences in perceived health risks of using solid fuels for cooking

Last registered on May 13, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Intrahousehold differences in perceived health risks of using solid fuels for cooking
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013604
Initial registration date
May 13, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
May 13, 2024, 12:45 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Washington

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Washington

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-05-22
End date
2025-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Household air pollution (HAP) caused an estimated 3.2 million deaths in 2020. Roughly 30% of the world’s population still relies on biomass-fueled stoves or open fires for cooking, which significantly contributes to HAP. One potential reason for the continued use of solid fuels could be limited awareness about health risks. Notably, since women’s exposure to HAP is much higher than men’s as they are often the primary cooks, it is possible that such lack of awareness is more pronounced for men. Our study proposes to first measure and highlight the differences in the subjective beliefs held by the household head and the primary cook about the health risks of cooking with solid fuels. We will then conduct a cluster RCT where either the household head or the primary cook will be given information in a one on one session about the actual health risks of using solid fuels. This includes information about long term diseases as well as prevalence of symptoms associated with the use of solid fuels from a baseline survey. The content of the information will be varied between treatments in order to test whether household heads prioritize the health of children over primary cooks. Through this study we aim to understand how such an information intervention affects household members' beliefs, fuel usage, and health outcomes.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Diwakant, Ananya and Theradapuzha Varghese Ninan. 2024. "Intrahousehold differences in perceived health risks of using solid fuels for cooking." AEA RCT Registry. May 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13604-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
3 Treatment groups where information about the health risks associated with the use of solid fuels would be shared
T1: Information shared with household head about the primary cook
T2: Information shared with household head about children
T3: Information shared with primary cook about children
Intervention Start Date
2024-07-15
Intervention End Date
2024-08-15

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Beliefs of Health Risks
2. Willingness to pay for Liquified Petroleum Gas
3. Amount of Solid Fuel used since intervention
4. Amount of LPG used since intervention
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Time use of women
2. Self Health outcomes of members in the household
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Cluster randomised control trial where villages will be assigned to 3 treatment groups and 1 pure control group. Information about the health risks of using solid fuels for various household members will be shared.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer (in STATA)
Randomization Unit
Village
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
100
Sample size: planned number of observations
2000
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
25 villages each in 3 treatments and 1 control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Health beliefs: 0.02 (probability), 2.6% or 0.22 SD Meals cooked on traditional stove: 1.08 meals, 8.6%, 0.24 SD Kg of Solid Fuel used: 1.29 kg, 30%, 0.23 SD LPG refills: 0.57 refills per year, 17.4%, 0.18 SD
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Washington IRB
IRB Approval Date
2024-02-13
IRB Approval Number
STUDY00019649