Information sharing, insurance decisions and conflict in the household

Last registered on June 24, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Information sharing, insurance decisions and conflict in the household
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013841
Initial registration date
June 18, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 24, 2024, 2:11 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Utrecht University School of Economics

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Utrecht University School of Economics
PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-01-28
End date
2025-03-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This research project aims to understand to what extent information about a financial product, when provided either to men or women, affects spouses’ beliefs and attitudes towards the financial product, product purchase decisions, and intra-household information sharing, cooperation and conflict outcomes. We conduct a randomized controlled trial among 3100 pastoral households in Kenya and Ethiopia. We randomize, at the household-level, the gender of the spouse that receives information about an index insurance and savings financial product through video interventions. Additionally, we cross-randomize whether or not the household member that is targeted with information can directly share the information with their spouse, by requesting the intervention team to also show the video to their spouse. We collect survey data from both the male and female spouse.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Chelanga, Philemon et al. 2024. "Information sharing, insurance decisions and conflict in the household." AEA RCT Registry. June 24. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13841-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In collaboration with our implementing partners, short videos were prepared that explain the product attributes, consumer value and customer care procedures of an index insurance and savings financial product. Sample communities were visited by survey teams, who showed the videos to either male or female individuals in treatment households in the process of conducting household surveys
Intervention (Hidden)
10-minute information videos about index insurance and savings were developed. For the purpose of this study we distinguish between the “product attributes video” and the “treatment video”.

The product attributes video explains basic attributes of the index insurance and savings financial product. For example, the video explains how insurance claim payments are determined and paid, and how pastoral households can register for the product.

The treatment video further describes the different welfare benefits of the insurance and savings financial product for pastoral households, and explains the procedures for pastoralists to address questions or issues in relation to the financial product. This is done using vignettes, presenting pastoralists in relatable situations. For example, one vignette addresses that for a pastoralist who worries a lot about future droughts, a benefit of insurance is that it may help to reduce these worries. Another vignette shows a pastoralist that wants to have more information or address an issue with their registration to the product, and then explains the process of contacting the customer care
system by phone to seek further information about the product, or report grievances.
Intervention Start Date
2024-01-28
Intervention End Date
2024-03-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
• First- and second-order beliefs about benefits and costs of insurance and savings.
• (Beliefs about) information sharing between spouses.
• Index insurance take-up and savings behaviour.
• Incidence of disagreements.
• Incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
• Knowledge of insurance and savings.
• Relationship quality.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Households receive new information about index insurance and savings through a video, and we randomly assign the gender of the spouse that receives it (target spouse): either an adult male household member or their female spouse. Additionally, we cross-randomize whether or not the target spouse can directly share the information with their spouse (non-target spouse), by requesting the video to also be shown to them.
Experimental Design Details
The product attributes video is shown to both a male and female spouse from all treatment households, but not to members of control households. The treatment video is only shown to one of the two spouses in treatment households, the “target spouse”, according to the household’s assignment into one of four treatment arms. We summarise each experimental arm below.
1. Treatment arm 1: Male
• The male spouse is the target spouse and watches the product attributes video and the
treatment video.
• The female spouse watches the product attributes video but not the treatment video.

2. Treatment arm 2: Female
• The female spouse is the target spouse and watches the product attributes video and
the treatment video.
• The male spouse watches the product attributes video but not the treatment video.

3. Treatment arm 3: Male + sharing option
• The male spouse is the target spouse and watches the product attributes video and the
treatment video.
• The female spouse watches the product attributes video but not the treatment video.
• After watching the video, the male spouse decides whether or not to also share the
treatment video with their female spouse.

4. Treatment arm 4: Female + sharing option
• The female spouse is the target spouse and watches the product attributes video and
the treatment video.
• The male spouse watches the product attributes video but not watch the treatment
video.
• After watching the video, the female spouse decides whether or not to also share the
treatment video with their male spouse.

5. Control arm
• Both spouses do not watch any video
Randomization Method
Randomization done using statistical software STATA
Randomization Unit
The level of randomization for treatment versus control is the community, the randomization of the four treatment arms is done at the household level.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3144 households across 393 communities
Sample size: planned number of observations
6288 respondents (2 per household).
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1327 households in the control group, approximately 450 in each of the four treatment arms.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Institutional Research Ethics Committee at International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
IRB Approval Date
2024-01-30
IRB Approval Number
ILRI-IREC2023-76
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

PAP_DRIVE_1_gender_targeting_SUBMITTED_18.6.24.pdf

MD5: 81baf542a8e264347dd1ce02e3ec4998

SHA1: caaefaa707ba55de3cb347205b85bc25d6b3bc53

Uploaded At: June 18, 2024

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials