Decision-making under risk and uncertainty

Last registered on July 29, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Decision-making under risk and uncertainty
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013852
Initial registration date
July 25, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 29, 2024, 5:23 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
The University of Adelaide

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
The University of Adelaide

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-08-01
End date
2026-06-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The study hypothesizes that individuals exposed to innovatively designed risky-investment products will invest significantly higher stakes than those exposed to simpler risky-investment products. Therefore, in this study, we explore why people are attracted to risky investments, such as investment projects consisting of multiple sub-projects. We will examine whether misjudging probability of success and being attracted to innovative risks cause people to overspend on these investment products in a series of controlled economic experiments.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bayer, Ralph-Christopher and Rubayat Sarwar. 2024. "Decision-making under risk and uncertainty ." AEA RCT Registry. July 29. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13852-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2024-08-01
Intervention End Date
2026-06-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The key outcome variable is the individual participant's decision about how much to invest in the investment games. Each participant will play a set of ten investment project games. Hence, one independent observation in a treatment will be a vector of ten investment choices by an individual participant, with each choice being between 0 and 8 dollars. We will then compare these decisions across three treatments.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
To investigate the underlying behavioral mechanisms driving people towards innovative risky investment products, we will conduct controlled economic experiments in a laboratory. There will be three groups of participants, corresponding to three different treatments. We will test how investment decisions differ among these groups. Each participant will play a set of ten investment project games, which are identical across the three treatments; i.e., projects will have identical probabilities and identical payouts. Identical projects across the three groups will help control the factors that could otherwise influence investment decisions. The only difference among these treatments will be how the projects are presented.

For each project, participants will be given a virtual endowment of 8 dollars in the programmed experiment in Z-tree, from which they can allocate their stakes between 0 and 8 dollars for the investments. The difference between their endowment and the amount invested will be part of their profit from the investment. The other part will be the return on the investment, received only if it is successful.

In Treatment 1, projects will be presented as investment projects consisting of multiple sub-projects, without compound probability of success information. We will provide probability information for each sub-project to the participants but will not tell them the compound probability of success for all sub-projects in an investment project. However, participants will be provided with a profit calculator on the game screen, which will be optional to use. They may or may not use it to calculate the expected income from any investment value in case of both successful and unsuccessful outcomes. Using intuition, participants will decide on the optimal level of investment.

In Treatment 2, the same investment projects consisting of multiple sub-projects will be offered, but with compound probability information.

In Treatment 3, the same projects will be offered in the form of single investment projects. All three treatments will present the payout from each unit of investment stake explicitly. In our experiment, as the games are objective, the value of probability information given in the experiment is free from human judgment. Each participant will undergo only one of these three treatments, making this experiment a cross-subject design.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
We randomly assign each experimental session to one of the 3 treatments. Participants voluntarily sign up to attend in our sessions. But at the time of registration, they do not know the treatment they will receive.
Randomization Unit
Session
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
As one independent observation will be a vector of ten investment choices by an individual participant, we will do clustering at individual level. The planned number of clusters is 150 and 10 observations per cluster. This approach captures the similarities in investment behavior across participants.
Sample size: planned number of observations
150 participants x 10 investment choices = 1,500 investment choices (observations)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Each treatment has 50 participants, and with three treatments, the total number of participants is 3 × 50 = 150.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
The method of using 150 clusters will provide with a high degree of variance in investment behavior among participants, from risk-averse to risk loving. This plan for individual-level clustering with 150 clusters will give us more power for analyzing investment choices.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Faculty of Arts, Business, Law and Economics Lower Risk Human Research Ethics Committee, The University of Adelaide
IRB Approval Date
2024-07-22
IRB Approval Number
H-2024-101