Infineed – Discrete Choice Experiment – Dynamic Norms

Last registered on July 01, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Infineed – Discrete Choice Experiment – Dynamic Norms
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0013892
Initial registration date
June 26, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 01, 2024, 12:12 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Neuchatel

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-07-01
End date
2024-07-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study explores consumer decision-making processes related to electricity saving through a comprehensive analysis integrating several theoretical frameworks and advanced modeling techniques. A Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) is employed to assess stated-preferences and predict choices across different electricity-saving measures. The Multinomial Logit Model (MNL) serves as the primary analytical tool, facilitating the estimation of choice probabilities based on observed characteristics. Additionally, a Latent Class Model (LCM) is utilized to uncover unobserved heterogeneity among respondents, identifying distinct segments with unique preference structures.

Theoretical underpinnings were drawn from the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Value-Belief-Norms (VBN) Theory, both of which provide insights into the motivational factors driving consumer behavior in the context of electricity conservation. TPB's focus on attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control is complemented by the VBN theory's emphasis on personal values and beliefs influencing norm activation and behavioral intentions.

Our main interest is to test whether making dynamic norms more salient helps to increase preferences for electricity-saving measures. Practically, we will conduct an experiment with a control group and two treatment groups: one where dynamic norms focus on increasing concerns about climate change, and another where dynamic norms focus on increasing concerns about the energy crisis. This dynamic perspective allows for an understanding of how evolving social influences can alter individual choices and preference stability.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Giauque, Fabien. 2024. "Infineed – Discrete Choice Experiment – Dynamic Norms." AEA RCT Registry. July 01. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.13892-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Control group: receives no information

Dynamic norms (Climate change): reads "According to a recent study, more and more Swiss are concerned about climate change and are taking action to save electricity."

Dynamic norms (Energy crisis): reads "According to a recent study, more and more Swiss are concerned about the energy crisis and are taking action to save electricity."
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2024-07-01
Intervention End Date
2024-07-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Interaction terms between attribute variables [electricity savings, investment, effort] and treatments
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Three attributes describe the choice situation of the choice experiment [electricity savings, investment, effort] with varying levels.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Interaction terms between variable from TPB and VBN theories and treatments (to assess mediation effect)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
- Online survey with participants that are customers of our partner electricity provider (receive invitation in electricity invoice)
- Participant randomly assign into one of the three conditions.
- Receives the treatment described before
- Receive une comprehensive description of the hypothetical scenarios (three screens: 1. investment 2. effort 3. choice situations)
- Face 5 times the choice situations with varying levels and the three attributes (3 alternatives + status quo).
- Answer a follow-up question about how much they think they can save (slider question)
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer
Randomization Unit
individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
800 Households
Sample size: planned number of observations
800 Households 5 choices each (4000 observations)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
260 households by condition
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Commission d'éthique de la recherche (CER) – UNINE
IRB Approval Date
2024-06-25
IRB Approval Number
126-2024

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials