Financial concerns, cognitive abilities, and economic decisions

Last registered on July 29, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Financial concerns, cognitive abilities, and economic decisions
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014056
Initial registration date
July 23, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 29, 2024, 5:13 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
UCSB

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
UC, Santa Barbara

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2023-08-01
End date
2024-11-01
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
A life in poverty is associated with worries, stress, and anxiety from the uncertainty of being able to afford essential household expenditures. We refer to the psychological hardships related to poverty as “financial concerns” and study whether lowering these concerns affects individuals’ cognitive abilities, effort, and subsequent decision-making processes and economic activity. We propose a lab-in-the-field experiment in Nairobi, Kenya, where we recruit low-income participants for two consecutive days of activities and exogenously vary the timing of a future, unconditional, and high-stakes payment to them. While we introduce an equivalent payment to both groups in monetary terms, the difference in timing lowers the immediate financial concerns for individuals in the treatment group relative to those in the control group. Since the promised income is only paid after the end of activities, participants are not able to consume it before all measurements are taken. This allows us to isolate financial concerns from consumption itself. We are then able to establish the existence of a causal relationship between financial concerns, cognitive abilities, and economic outcomes.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Malagutti, Flavio and Lei Yue. 2024. "Financial concerns, cognitive abilities, and economic decisions." AEA RCT Registry. July 29. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14056-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2023-08-01
Intervention End Date
2024-11-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Lab-based tasks on cognitive abilities, effort, and economic reasoning
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We bring participants to the lab for activities over two consecutive days (Day 1 and Day 2) and organize them in sessions of 25 individuals. In each session, participants work independently but all at the same time. We randomize treatment assignments at the session level. With equal probability, a session of 25 participants is assigned to be a LC (“Low-Concerns”) or a HC (“High-Concerns”) experimental group. From here on, we refer to the treatment group as “the treated” or “the LC (Low-Concerns) group” and to the control group as “the control” or “the HC (High-Concerns ) group.” In the LC group, participants are informed they will receive KES 2000 ($15) at the end of Day 2 – the next and consecutive day of activities. KES 2000 is equivalent to a week's worth of the average household expenditure in our sample. In the HC group, participants are informed they will receive KES 2200 ($16.35) but 30 days later.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer
Randomization Unit
Lab session
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
180 individual participants
Sample size: planned number of observations
180
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
90 individual participants in each arm
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Amref Health Africa
IRB Approval Date
2024-07-19
IRB Approval Number
ESRC P1691/2024
IRB Name
Maseno University Scientific and Ethics Review Committee
IRB Approval Date
2022-09-30
IRB Approval Number
MSU/DRPI/MUERC/00011/13
IRB Name
UCSB Human Subjects Committee
IRB Approval Date
2023-01-27
IRB Approval Number
15-22-0632