Targeting Goals

Last registered on August 28, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Targeting Goals
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014235
Initial registration date
August 21, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
August 28, 2024, 3:03 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University of Cologne

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-08-21
End date
2024-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial is based on or builds upon one or more prior RCTs.
Abstract
There is a wide range of literature that shows the strong relationship between goal setting and performance. In this study, this relationship is investigated even further by conducting a field experiment with continuous treatment of goal setting. We study whether goals should be assigned to people based on their personal traits (such as ability, self-efficacy, etc.) to attain an even higher performance increase than in the case of a pre-defined general goal of high difficulty. Moreover, we study whether the relationship between goal difficulty and performance has curvilinear (inverse-U) shape.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Talantceva, Marina. 2024. "Targeting Goals." AEA RCT Registry. August 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14235-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Participants first fill out a survey on demographics, preferences, and personality traits and work on task. In a second part subjects are again invited to work on a real effort task. This time, a specific performance goal is randomly assigned to each subject and subjects receive a bonus when reaching the goal.
Intervention Start Date
2024-08-21
Intervention End Date
2024-10-10

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The primary outcome variable is the number of points gained in the real-effort task. The aim of this study is to estimate Conditional Average Treatment Effects of variations in goal size based on prior performance and personal characteristics of the participants. We will use this to estimate (i) how the size of the performance-maximizing goal depends on prior performance and a person’s preferences and personality and (ii) whether performance can be increased by targeting goals to individuals based on their characteristics.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Enjoyment of the task.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The Prolific experiment will consist of two parts. In the first part, participants have to complete a survey, where information about participants’ demographics (age, gender, education, race), risk preferences, loss aversion, ambition, level of self-esteem, beliefs about their own performance, and Big-5 Personality traits will be collected. In addition, an open question (“If you think about yourself: Are you a person who is motivated by challenges or do too challenging tasks rather demotivate you? Please explain also why this is the case in your view.”) will be asked. After that, participants complete a real-effort task for 10 minutes with an opportunity to train themselves for 30 seconds before. They are not incentivized and receive only a participation fee for completing this part of the experiment.

The real-effort task follows DellaVigna and Pope (2018): Participants have to alternately press 'a' and 'b' buttons on their keyboards. For each correct sequence pressed, they get 1 point. All participants receive information about the number of gained points on their screen.
We invite participants again after approximately one week to participate in the second part of the experiment. We will only invite participants who have completed all the sections from the first part of the study. In the second part, they again have to do the same real-effort task for 10 minutes. However, before starting with the task, each of them is assigned with a goal, which is a number of points that they have to gain to receive a financial bonus. After finishing the real-effort task, participants fill out a short post-survey consisting of questions about their enjoyment of the task. At the end of the experiment, workers will be redirected to Prolific, and will receive the participation fees and bonuses (for those who reached the goal).
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
The goals are randomly assigned. The assignment follows a probability distribution which was constructed as follows: We started with the performance distribution obtained in a study that used the same real-effort task (Opitz et al. (MaSci 2024)). The range of the values from the previous study is split to quintiles. Participants are first randomly assigned to each quintile, and then receive a random target value drawn from the range of performance outcomes in the respective quintile. After conducting a pilot, we added to each quintile the average performance increase between the two parts of the experiment over the whole sample. That is done for the purpose of having more observations in the range of performance likely to be achieved and less observations for extreme values (where likely either all subjects reach the target or no one is able to do).
Randomization Unit
Individual subject
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
The number of clusters is the number of individuals (see below).
Sample size: planned number of observations
We invite 3000 individual subjects to participate in the study as it is a pilot.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Due to the randomization method (see above) treatment assignment is continuous.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Cologne Ethics Board
IRB Approval Date
2024-07-02
IRB Approval Number
240032MT