Discrimination or misperception

Last registered on September 12, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Discrimination or misperception
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014313
Initial registration date
September 05, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
September 12, 2024, 5:44 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Waseda University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2024-08-21
End date
2024-09-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In many developing countries, health issues remain a critical barrier to economic growth. Among the most prevalent of these issues is anemia, which affects approximately 30% of women globally, with over half of the cases occurring in developing nations. Anemia not only harms individual health but also diminishes labor productivity, thus hindering economic development. However, anemia can often be alleviated through low-cost supplements, meaning that the usual problem of liquidity constraints in developing countries may not significantly hinder treatment. Despite this, anemia continues to be a widespread and unresolved issue.

Several factors contribute to the persistence of anemia. For instance, inadequate diagnostic accuracy by healthcare providers and the "psychological sunk cost" effect—where individuals assume that higher-priced treatments are inherently more effective—have been identified as barriers (Banerjee and Duflo, 2012). Furthermore, there may be a gender gap in how health information is received and acted upon. Public health initiatives in developing countries frequently rely on community health workers to disseminate health advice. However, if gender bias influences the decision to accept health guidance, there is a risk that information provided by female health workers will be undervalued compared to that from male workers. This dynamic could reduce the overall efficiency of health interventions. In fact, gender gaps in information diffusion have been observed in fields like agriculture and business, suggesting similar trends may exist in healthcare.

The causes of such gender gaps are multifaceted. Discriminatory attitudes toward women could be a contributing factor, but another possibility is the systematic underestimation of women's competencies. Notably, Tsugawa et al. (2017) found that female physicians may provide higher-quality care than their male counterparts, indicating that the undervaluation of female health workers could be based on misperceptions rather than actual differences in ability. If these misperceptions are indeed driving the gender gap, targeted efforts to correct them through information campaigns could significantly improve the acceptance of health interventions led by women.

The aim of this study is to investigate the existence and extent of gender gaps in healthcare delivery in developing countries and to identify the underlying causes. If these causes are rooted in misperceptions, providing accurate information could offer a viable pathway to reducing the gender gap and enhancing the effectiveness of public health efforts.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Takahashi, Ryo. 2024. "Discrimination or misperception." AEA RCT Registry. September 12. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14313-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2024-08-23
Intervention End Date
2024-09-09

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
List experiment and attitude indicators.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We randomly assign participants to one of three groups, each of which watches a video introducing iron supplements as a preventative measure against anemia. In each video, a community health worker explains the issue of anemia, the benefits of using supplements, and the associated costs. The key variation across treatments is the gender of the presenter: in Treatment 1, a male health worker delivers the information, while in Treatments 2 and 3, the presenter is female. Importantly, the content of the videos is identical, with the only difference being the gender of the health worker.

In Treatment 3, an additional intervention is introduced prior to showing the video. This intervention provides participants with evidence from previous studies demonstrating that female healthcare professionals have been found to deliver higher-quality care than their male counterparts. The aim of this intervention is to address any potential bias or misperception related to the capabilities of female health workers, ensuring that the information presented is evaluated more objectively.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done by a computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
5 villages
Sample size: planned number of observations
420
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
140
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Ethics Review Committee on Research with Human Subjects of Waseda University
IRB Approval Date
2021-06-24
IRB Approval Number
2021-111

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials