Systematic Discrimination in China: Evidence from Audit Study

Last registered on March 19, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Systematic Discrimination in China: Evidence from Audit Study
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014372
Initial registration date
March 16, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
March 19, 2025, 9:35 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Fudan University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Boston University
PI Affiliation
Fudan University
PI Affiliation
Griffith University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-09-17
End date
2026-07-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study examines gender-based discrimination in the Chinese labor market, focusing on the initial screening process for junior white-collar positions. Against the backdrop of a challenging labor market for recent college graduates—where 11.58 million graduates in 2023 nearly matched the 12.44 million new urban job openings—we investigate how gender and educational background influence hiring decisions. Using an audit study approach with fictitious resumes, we quantify the prevalence, heterogeneity, and drivers of discrimination across firms, occupations, and regions. We assess whether discrimination is widespread or concentrated in specific sectors, varies by firm characteristics, and is more pronounced among elite versus non-elite graduates. Employing summary statistics, fixed effects regressions, and nonparametric empirical Bayes methods, we identify sources of discrimination, compute firm-level posterior probabilities, and evaluate the trade-offs of regulatory interventions. The findings aim to provide empirical evidence and policy insights to address discriminatory practices in hiring.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Lang, Kevin et al. 2025. "Systematic Discrimination in China: Evidence from Audit Study." AEA RCT Registry. March 19. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14372-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We will conduct a resume correspondence study, randomly assigning gender and educational background to job applications submitted to a large number of vacancies at major publicly listed firms.
Intervention Start Date
2024-11-01
Intervention End Date
2026-07-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
The key outcome of interest is whether a job applicant receives a positive response from an employer via email, phone call, or text message.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
We operationalize employers' responses to job applications by measuring their progressive engagement with applicants. Specifically, we examine the probability of being contacted by employers within 60 days of application submission. Employer responses are categorized into four distinct outcomes, each represented as a binary variable:

\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Interest}: This variable takes a value of 1 if the applicant's resume is marked as showing "interest" by the HR team on the recruitment platform, and 0 otherwise.

\item \textbf{Follow-up}: This variable is set to 1 if the employer requests additional materials or information from the applicant, either via email or through the recruitment platform's mobile app, and 0 otherwise.

\item \textbf{Callback}: This variable equals 1 if the applicant receives an interview invitation or a direct phone call from the employer, either to conduct an immediate interview or to inquire further about the applicant's qualifications, and 0 otherwise.

\item \textbf{Rejection}: This variable is set to 1 if the employer marks the applicant as "Not suitable" without any prior interaction. However, if the employer marks the applicant as "Not suitable" after attempting to contact the applicant and receiving no response, the rejection is coded as 0.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The experiment requires several careful design choices, including the design of CVs, how to identify vacancies and submit applications, how to measure callback. We randomly assign applicants to one of four types (Male/Female× (non) Elite Universities) within each vacancy.
Group 1: Male and Elite University
Group 2: Male and non-Elite University
Group 3: Female and Elite University
Group 4: Female and non-Elite University
We will carefully track employers’ responses to each application. After receiving the callback, we will record it and inform the employers that the fictitious applicants will be no longer available for this job vacancy.
Please refer to the attached document for detail description of the research design of this study.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
All resume characteristics will be randomly assigned by computer as part of our resume generation software.
Randomization Unit
Resumes
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
188 target firm, about 1048 job vacancies, four resumes/applicants for each job vacancies.
Sample size: planned number of observations
more than 20,000 job applications.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
The applicant will be equally divided across 4 treatment groups.
Group 1: Male and Elite University, sent to at least 1048 vacancies
Group 2: Male and non-Elite University, sent to at least 1048 vacancies
Group 3: Female and Elite University, sent to at least1048 vacancies
Group 4: Female and non-Elite University, sent to at least 1048 vacancies
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
minimum of 1048 vacancies needed to detect the effect size at adjusted significance level of 0.00833 (0.05/6) and power of 0.80.
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Fudan University
IRB Approval Date
2025-02-15
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information