Reducing gender discrimination in MSME lending by informing loan officers of their own implicit bias

Last registered on October 07, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Reducing gender discrimination in MSME lending by informing loan officers of their own implicit bias
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014499
Initial registration date
October 01, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 07, 2024, 7:10 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
IDB Invest

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
EBRD
PI Affiliation
IDB Invest
PI Affiliation
Stockholm University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-10-02
End date
2025-10-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
Globally, women entrepreneurs are more likely to report access to finance as a constraint to doing business. Previous research shows that women entrepreneurs often face higher rejection rates, smaller loan amounts, higher interest rates, or more stringent guarantor requirements compared to men. These patterns are present in both high- and low-income countries, partly driven by traditional gender norms and the implicit biases these norms foster. Often referred to as unconscious bias, implicit bias can influence behavior without the decision-maker's conscious awareness, making it a persistent barrier for banks aiming to reduce gender-based discrimination in lending.

This project will examine the causal impact of informing loan officers about their potential biases on their lending behavior and loan portfolio performance. We will assess this by first administering an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to loan officers, and then randomly varying the timing of score disclosure. Some officers will receive immediate feedback on their IAT score, while others will receive the feedback later. This will allow us to evaluate whether loan officers alter their behavior after becoming aware of their potential biases.

External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Arraiz, Irani et al. 2024. "Reducing gender discrimination in MSME lending by informing loan officers of their own implicit bias." AEA RCT Registry. October 07. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14499-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)

This project will examine the causal impact of informing loan officers about their potential gender biases on their lending behavior and loan portfolio performance. We will assess this by first administering an Implicit Association Test (IAT) to loan officers, and then randomly varying the timing of score disclosure. Some officers will receive immediate feedback on their IAT score, while others will receive the feedback later. This will allow us to evaluate whether loan officers alter their behavior after becoming aware of their potential biases.

Intervention (Hidden)
Loan officers participating in the study will be asked to complete an online tool that includes the following modules:

Module I. Implicit association test: The module looks at the strength of associations between concepts (e.g., men, women) and stereotypes (e.g., business, family) with the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The test consists of a series of words that are presented on the screen that the respondent must classify, for example, as associated with the categories "family" or "business" (in some sub-blocks) or "male" or "female" (in other sub-blocks). In the concluding sub-blocks, the four categories are paired into two groups: one "congruent" with usual social associations (female-family and male-business), and the other "incongruent" with unusual social associations (female-business and male-family). Respondents are required to categorize words (i.e. "children", linked to "family") into the appropriate categories (business and family) within 5 seconds. The logic behind the test is that response speed is unconsciously influenced by irrelevant ranking categories. In simpler terms, responding becomes easier when closely linked items share the same response key (Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998). For example, individuals that have gender biases may respond more quickly to identifying the word "child" ("sales") when the correct category "family" ("business") is presented on the same side as the category "female" ("male"). However, their response may be slower when the correct category "family" ("business") is positioned on the same side as the category "male" ("female"). The module consists of two test sub-blocks, each with 5 repetitions, to familiarize respondents with the activities. It is then followed by four evaluation sub-blocks, with 25 and 50 repetitions each, of the IAT.

Experiment: After bank officers complete this module, those assigned to the treatment group will receive additional information on their IAT results, including some suggested practices to limit the influence their automatic associations have on their workplace decisions and behaviors. Those in the control group will receive this information at a later time.

Module II. Short demographic survey. Respondents will also answer a short survey asking them about their household composition, years working in the sector, household income, and whether they have hold a loan themselves in the past years.
Intervention Start Date
2024-10-02
Intervention End Date
2024-12-20

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Loan rejection rates, loan size, interest rates, guarantor requirements, borrower repayment behavior
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The impact will be assessed by randomly varying the timing of disclosure of loan officers' potential gender stereotypes. To begin, loan officers' gender biases will be measured using an Implicit Association Test (IAT). After the test, half of the loan officers will receive immediate feedback on their IAT score (the treatment group), while the other half will receive their feedback six months later (the control group).

Loan officer behavior and portfolio performance will be tracked and evaluated over the six-month period following the test.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization done in office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Individual level randomization
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not a clustered design
Sample size: planned number of observations
160 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
80 treated and 80 control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Heartland IRB
IRB Approval Date
2024-09-25
IRB Approval Number
092524-609

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials