Mission impossible

Last registered on October 18, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Mission impossible
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014571
Initial registration date
October 14, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 18, 2024, 5:04 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
PI Affiliation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-10-15
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This study investigates individuals' beliefs about how society responds to men and women who do or do not display certain traits and behaviors.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Exley, Christine, David Klinowski and Muriel Niederle. 2024. "Mission impossible." AEA RCT Registry. October 18. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14571-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Intervention (Hidden)
Intervention Start Date
2024-10-15
Intervention End Date
2025-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
For each trait or behavior we investigate, our primary outcome variables are

(i) Four unincentivized responses obtained from asking the participant what they think are society's attitudes toward a [man/woman] who [displays/does not display] the given trait or behavior.

(ii) Four incentivized beliefs obtained from asking a different participant to guess the responses given by a randomly-chosen participant in (i).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We will conduct an experiment on Prolific. Participants will be randomized into either:

(i) A version in which they are asked to provide their views about society's attitudes toward men and women who display or do not display certain traits and behaviors

(ii) A version in which they are asked to provide their beliefs about the responses given by a randomly-chosen participant in (i)
Experimental Design Details
We will conduct the experiment on Prolific. Participants will be recruited for a 15-minute study. Their participation will involve responding to 60 questions and completing a demographics questionnaire.

Participants will be randomized into a "self" or "other" version.

In the "self" version, participants will be asked whether they think society reacts in a certain way when a [man/woman] [displays/does not display] certain trait or behavior. The participant's response will not be incentivized.

Participants will answer a block of 30 questions about a man and a block of 30 questions about a woman, where the order of the blocks will be randomized. Within a block, 15 questions ask about an individual who displays a given trait or behavior, and 15 questions ask about an individual who does not display a given trait or behavior. The order of the 30 questions within a block will be randomized.

We will study 15 different traits or behaviors: risk taking, generosity, cooperativeness, positive reciprocity, negative reciprocity in response to behavior toward self, negative reciprocity in response to behavior toward others, trust, trustworthiness, competitiveness, negotiation, ambition, assertiveness, confidence, leadership, and self-promotion. With four questions per trait or behavior, a participant in the "self" version will be asked 60 questions of this type in total.

We will study 3 types of societal reactions: praise, approval, and criticism. Participants will be randomized into one of these 3 reactions.

Participants in the "other" version will be asked to guess the responses given by a randomly-chosen participant in the "self" version. Guesses will be incentivized with a BDM mechanism.

Therefore, there will be in total 6 across-participant treatments: [self/other] x [praise/approval/criticism].

We hypothesize that beliefs in both the "self" and "other" treatments will cluster into three categories based on the following traits or behaviors:

1. Positive social traits or behaviors (generosity, cooperativeness, positive reciprocity, trust, and trustworthiness)
For these traits or behaviors, we hypothesize that individuals will expect that both men and women are similarly able to achieve high levels of praise, secure high levels of approval, and avoid most criticism by engaging in the trait or behavior.

2. Labor market traits or behaviors (risk taking, competitiveness, negotiation, ambition, assertiveness, confidence, leadership, and self-promotion)
We hypothesize that individuals will expect that men receive high levels of praise, high levels of approval, and low levels of criticism by displaying "male-typed" traits or behaviors: by being leaders, competitive, risk-taking, confident, ambitious, assertive, keen to negotiate, and self-promoting. By contrast, individuals will expect that men receive substantially lower levels of praise, lower levels of approval, and higher levels of criticism by not being leaders, competitive, risk-taking, confident, ambitious, assertive, keen to negotiate, and self-promoting.
For women, we hypothesize that individuals will expect that, relative to the high levels of praise and approval and low levels of criticism that men can achieve by displaying the "male-typed" traits or behaviors, women cannot secure similarly high levels of praise, high levels of approval, or low levels of criticism regardless of whether they are leaders or not, competitive or not, risk-taking or not, confident or not, ambitious or not, assertive or not, keen to negotiate or not, and self-promoting or not. At the same time, we hypothesize that, relative to the low levels of praise and approval and high levels of criticism that men receive by not displaying "male-typed" traits or behaviors, women can secure higher levels of praise, higher levels of approval, and lower levels of criticism regardless of whether they are leaders or not, competitive or not, risk-taking or not, confident or not, ambitious or not, assertive or not, keen to negotiate or not, and self-promoting or not.

3. Negative reciprocity (negative reciprocity in response to behavior toward self, negative reciprocity in response to behavior toward others)
For these traits or behaviors, given that women are often expected to be more socially oriented but men are often expected to be more harsh, our predictions are less clear.
Randomization Method
Randomization by a computer
Randomization Unit
Individual
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
3000 individuals
Sample size: planned number of observations
3000 individuals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
500 individuals per treatment (6 across-subject treatments)
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
University of Pittsburgh
IRB Approval Date
2024-01-10
IRB Approval Number
STUDY24010016
IRB Name
University of Michigan
IRB Approval Date
2023-10-25
IRB Approval Number
IRB00000245

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials