Assessing the impact of a brief video intervention to reduce ageism in Mexico

Last registered on October 28, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Assessing the impact of a brief video intervention to reduce ageism in Mexico
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014650
Initial registration date
October 25, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
October 28, 2024, 1:34 PM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Maastricht University / United Nations University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
Completed
Start date
2024-09-27
End date
2024-09-29
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This research uses the positive education component of the PEACE model introduced by Sheri R. Levy in 2016 as a framework to design a brief video intervention. Using a randomised online survey experiment, the effectiveness of the video in increasing ageing knowledge and reducing the endorsement of negative stereotypes is evaluated.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Risueño Navarro, Lucía. 2024. "Assessing the impact of a brief video intervention to reduce ageism in Mexico." AEA RCT Registry. October 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14650-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
An intervention based on a short video to increase knowledge about ageing and reduce negative age stereotypes. The treatment video (approximately 3 minutes) discusses facts about ageing, provides accurate information on health statistics for older adults in Mexico, and provides positive examples of old adult role models. The design of the video content thus follows the PEACE (Positive Education about Aging and Contact Experiences) Model by Sheri R Levy (2016).

To examine the impact of the video on the outcomes of interest, an online experiment was set up in Prolific, targeted to a Mexican audience (ages 18-59), thus excluding the cohort defined by the law as old adults who are from age 60 in Mexico. When participants in the platform indicated their interest, they were redirected to Qualtrics, which first provided them with an information sheet and a consent form. After agreeing to participate, responses to demographics and the questions that evaluated the outcomes of interest, as well as one attention check and two filler items, were recorded. Afterwards, individuals were uniformly and randomly allocated into the control or treatment group and exposed to the associated videos (placebo or treatment). After this step, the same questions of the first block (excluding the demographic questions and, additionally, a different attention check) were asked, in addition to two questions on their past contact frequency and quality with older adults.

Participants who failed the attention check were excluded to ensure the quality of responses. After, the comparability of both treatment groups was assessed with balance tests involving the baseline characteristics. Once the existence of no imbalances was verified, the impact of the treatment on the outcome of interest was assessed with a difference-in-differences model. Two linear regressions were run with it, using scores of the ageing knowledge (Palmore, 1977) and after the scores for the ageing semantic differential (Rosencranz & McNevin, 1969) as the dependent variables. The results support the hypotheses that the video increased ageing knowledge and decreased the endorsement of negative age stereotypes at a 5% significance level.
Intervention (Hidden)
Ageing knowledge and age stereotypes are measured before and after watching the video. The control group watched a placebo video, comparable in length and visual design and adapted to the Mexican context.
Intervention Start Date
2024-09-27
Intervention End Date
2024-09-29

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Six questions of Palmore's Facts on Aging Quiz (1977) and three adjectives of the Aging Semantic Differential scale by Rosencranz and McNevin (1969).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Ageing knowledge was assessed through Palmore's Facts on Aging Quiz (1977), and the endorsement of negative age stereotypes was assessed through the Aging Semantic Differential scale by Rosencranz and McNevin (1969).

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
Online randomised experiment, with pre-test and immediate post-test after the intervention.
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomisation was applied through Qualtrics “randomisation block,” which uniformly assigns participants to achieve similar-sized groups.
Randomization Unit
Individuals
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
420
Sample size: planned number of observations
420
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
151 individuals control, 159 individuals watched treatment video. This results in a final sample of 310 individuals, 110 lower than the initial 420 (which has 210 control, 210 treatment) as individuals failed the attention checks.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials