Integrating Aquaculture-Agriculture to Combat Food Insecurity in Malawi

Last registered on July 28, 2025

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Integrating Aquaculture-Agriculture to Combat Food Insecurity in Malawi
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014852
Initial registration date
July 25, 2025

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
July 28, 2025, 9:28 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
International Evaluation of Impact Evaluation
PI Affiliation
International Evaluation of Impact Evaluation
PI Affiliation
International Evaluation of Impact Evaluation

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2025-01-20
End date
2028-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
The Integrating Aquaculture-Agriculture to Combat Food Insecurity in Malawi (IAAM Project) is a five (5) year, NOK $170 million initiative funded by the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad). The goal of the project is to increase the productivity and incomes of, and access to markets by small-scale food producers, especially women, engaged in the integrated aquaculture-agriculture system (IAAS) comprising fish, crops, livestock, and agroforestry sub-systems to combat food insecurity.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Banda, Esau et al. 2025. "Integrating Aquaculture-Agriculture to Combat Food Insecurity in Malawi." AEA RCT Registry. July 28. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14852-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
In partnership with Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), the Project will establish demonstration ponds in six districts to showcase the desired skills and good practices to adopt and replicate the IAAS approaches, such as: (i) a pond on rice-fish integration; (ii) a pond for polyculture of red breasted tilapia with an indigenous dwarf cichlid integrated with goats; (iii) a pond with tilapia and an indigenous dwarf cichlid integrated with poultry. All three types of ponds will be integrated with orange flesh sweet potato vines cultivated around the ponds. In addition, regular on-farm training and mentoring of the smallholder farmers, especially women, will be provided with the support of SMEs, cooperatives, NGOs, and other local players, especially through peer collaboration among women and youth.
Intervention Start Date
2025-06-01
Intervention End Date
2028-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Food security, income and productivity.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
1. Food Insecurity –
a. Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) - The Food Insecurity Experience Scale Survey Module (FIES-SM) is composed of eight core questions with dichotomous yes/no responses.
b. Months in a year with inadequate food (less than 3 full stomach meals) for every household member.
2. Dietary diversity - measured by consumption of various food groups in the last 24 hours.
3. Income – Income generated from crop, livestock, and fish farming.
4. Productivity – Volume of crops, livestock and fish, produced at the household level.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Number farmer households practicing IAAS and uptake of new business development services.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
1. Increased knowledge among small holder farmers on managing climate risks to support resilient aquaculture production
2. Increased adoption of integrated aquaculture-agriculture system by small-holder farmers,
3. Access to productive assets including land.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
This study employs a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the impact of integrated aquaculture-agriculture systems (IAAS). Eight districts in Malawi were purposively selected for inclusion based on their potential for IAAS resource development, high levels of poverty among agricultural communities, opportunities for ecological restoration, and demonstrated government commitment to aquaculture-agriculture production as a strategy to address food insecurity.

The Malawi Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) is administratively structured into 28 District Agriculture Development Offices (DADOs), which are further divided into 154 Extension Planning Areas (EPAs). Each EPA is subdivided into Sections—commonly referred to as EPA Sections or EPAS—which represent the lowest administrative level and the primary point of service delivery to farmers. Each EPAS is overseen by an Agriculture Extension Development Officer (AEDO).

Within the eight selected districts, EPAS units will be randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. The treatment group will receive the full IAAS intervention package, while the control group will not receive any project interventions during the trial period.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization done in the office by a computer.
Randomization Unit
Extension Planning Area Sections (EPAS) or EPA Sections.
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
160 Extension Planning Area Sections (EPAS) or EPA Sections.
Sample size: planned number of observations
2,900 fish farming households
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
80 EPA Sections treatment, and 80 EPA Sections control.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Power: 0.8 (80% chance of detecting a true effect of this size or larger). With a sample size of 2,900 farmers, the study can detect effects as small as 0.14 standard deviations when the ICC is low (0.05), but this increases to 0.17 standard deviations when the ICC is higher (0.10).
Supporting Documents and Materials

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
National Committee on Research in The Social Sciences and Humanities (NCRSH)
IRB Approval Date
2025-01-30
IRB Approval Number
12/24/944
Analysis Plan

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information