(Misperceived) Power and Women Working Outside the Home in Lebanon

Last registered on December 03, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
(Misperceived) Power and Women Working Outside the Home in Lebanon
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014906
Initial registration date
November 25, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 03, 2024, 1:26 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
University Paris Nanterre

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
University of Reading
PI Affiliation
University of Verona

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-12-02
End date
2025-03-22
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In many countries, female participation in the labor market remains strikingly low, challenging women's empowerment and limiting their role in major household decisions. One possible impediment to women's participation in the workforce lies in the misperception of their own real power and the prevailing belief that power is not necessarily achieved through employment. Asymmetries in beliefs among married men and women lead to differences in economic outcomes in a self-fulfilling way, limiting women's working aspirations. Our study aims to test whether information provision can be effective in altering women's attitudes toward their work outside the home. The analysis runs on separate samples of married men and women in Lebanon. We use an information treatment based on men's opinions to address information frictions, designed to correct women's perceptions of their own power. We explore how adjusting these perceptions influences women's preferences for work and their beliefs about what factors affect empowerment.

External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
El Badaoui, Eliane, Stefania Lovo and Eleonora Mattteazzi. 2024. "(Misperceived) Power and Women Working Outside the Home in Lebanon." AEA RCT Registry. December 03. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14906-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The survey experiment will be completed using iField data collection tool that integrates CAPI (Computer Aided Personal Interviewing). Enumerators will interview men and women based on the design sample selection criteria and a quota system that ensures a representative sample. Respondents will not receive any incentives for participation.
Intervention Start Date
2024-12-02
Intervention End Date
2025-03-22

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We have three primary outcomes of interest:

1) The opinion of married men about wives’ decision-making power, participation in paid work, and the interaction of both.

2) The perception of married women about their power, the interaction between working outside the home and power, and men’s preference for married women working outside the home.

3) The opinion of married women about the degree of power of a hypothetical married woman described in a vignette.
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Attitudes of wives toward job market participation using a list of nine interests among which three are related to the main research question.
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The research design unfolds in two stages.
- First, we uncover the opinions of 500 Lebanese married men (aged 25-50 and living in Beirut and Mount Lebanon governorates) on women's employment and power in household decision-making using list experiments and direct questions.
- In the second stage, a sample of 1000 Lebanese married women (aged 20-45 and living in Beirut and Mount Lebanon governorates) is interviewed to conduct an information treatment. Half of the women are randomly selected to receive accurate information about men's opinions based on the results of the first step or other available statistics. The aim is (i) to examine women's opinions on working outside the home, their perceived power, and their interaction, and (ii) to investigate potential sources of women's power. The outcomes are measured with three list experiments, a vignette, and direct questions.

Both stages are implemented using face-to-face interviews. A pilot is conducted for both stages.

The list experiments have 3 so-called "baseline" items, while treatment-group respondents are asked about a list of 4 items. The order of the items in each list is randomised. The sensitive item is replaced by a direct Yes/No question for the control group.

Each vignette consists of a short description of a hypothetical family situation. Respondents are asked their opinion on the employment choices made by the woman in the vignette and on her power within the family. The factor variation covers the role of pre-marriage and in-marriage financial transfers, the woman's working status, and the husband's financial situation.

Finally, we elicit women's attitudes toward job market participation by asking them to rank topics of interest from a list of nine options, including some job-related options.

A post-experimental individual survey (in both the first and second stages) collects information on sociodemographic characteristics (age, education, occupational status of both partners, family composition, financial situation, and pre-marriage transfers) and opinions.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Married men sample:
The respondents are randomly assigned to the treatment and the control groups for the list experiments.  Of the 500 sampled men, 320 get the lists with the sensitive statement (treatment group), and 180 get the lists without the sensitive statement but a direct YES/NO question (control group). The order of the statements in each list will be randomly determined for each respondent.

Married women sample:
The respondents will be randomly assigned to the information treatment and the control group (500 women each).
Of the 500 women in the information treatment group, 320 get the lists with the sensitive statement (treatment group), and 180 get the lists without the sensitive statement and a direct YES/NO question (control group). The order of the statements in each list will be randomly determined for each respondent. The same distribution is applied to the 500 women in the information control group.
Respondents in both the information-treatment group and the control group receive a vignette. Each respondent will randomly get one of the five vignette versions, with 100 respondents from each group (treatment and control) getting the same version.
Randomization Unit
Randomization occurs at the individual level.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not applicable.
Sample size: planned number of observations
500 respondents for the men’s face-to-face interviews and 1000 respondents for the women’s face-to-face interviews.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
In the sample of women, 500 are in the information-treated group and 500 are in the control group.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
Due to the absence of pre-existing data on our main outcomes, we cannot provide accurate power calculations.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Université La Sagesse (Lebanon)
IRB Approval Date
2024-11-06
IRB Approval Number
ULS/IRB-2024-8