When Innovation Meets Resistance: Information Provision and Consumer Decisions on Autonomous Taxis

Last registered on December 04, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
When Innovation Meets Resistance: Information Provision and Consumer Decisions on Autonomous Taxis
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0014934
Initial registration date
December 02, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 04, 2024, 9:34 AM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
Wuhan University

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Peking University
PI Affiliation
Wuhan University
PI Affiliation
Wuhan University

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2024-12-03
End date
2025-09-30
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
This project outlines a field experiment examining how information provision influences consumer adoption of Autonomous Taxis (ATs), a novel AI-driven transportation technology. Through randomized information interventions that emphasize either efficiency gains or social impact concerns regarding job replacement, we study the tradeoff between economic benefits and fairness considerations in technology adoption. By tracking both immediate responses and behavioral changes in short-term and long-term AT usage, this study provides causal evidence on how different types of information shape consumer decisions when confronting technological innovation.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Bai, Lu et al. 2024. "When Innovation Meets Resistance: Information Provision and Consumer Decisions on Autonomous Taxis." AEA RCT Registry. December 04. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.14934-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
We will conduct a randomized information provision experiment examining how different framings of autonomous taxi (AT) information affect consumer adoption decisions. A total of 1,200 participants will be randomly assigned to four groups of 300 participants each. The Control Group will receive neutral, non-AT-related scientific information. The Positive Information Group will receive information about economic efficiency gains of ATs. The Negative Information Group will receive information about potential socioeconomic impacts regarding job replacement for taxi drivers. The Combined Information Group will receive both positive and negative information.
Our experiment employs a two-stage design to examine both immediate responses and longer-term behavioral changes in autonomous taxi adoption.
Stage 1 encompasses three sequential components: First, participants complete a pre-intervention survey measuring baseline preferences and demographic characteristics. Second, they receive their assigned information treatment, with content varying by experimental group but maintaining consistent length and format. Third, participants receive a promotional coupon for the Robotaxi APP, enabling one free autonomous taxi ride within a specified validity period.
Stage 2 captures sustained behavioral changes through dual data collection channels. Following the coupon expiration date, we administer a comprehensive follow-up survey to measure post-intervention attitudes and document actual usage experiences. Simultaneously, through our partnership with the platform provider, we continuously monitor participants' APP usage patterns to track revealed preferences in AT adoption. This two-stage design enables us to measure both stated preferences through surveys and revealed preferences through actual behavioral data.
Intervention Start Date
2024-12-06
Intervention End Date
2025-01-01

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
1. Immediate AT Preference: 10-point scale measuring willingness to use AT services, collected immediately after the information intervention
2. Short-term AT Adoption: Binary indicator (0/1) of whether the participant uses the free AT coupon during its validity period
3. Long-term AT Engagement: Continuous measure of APP usage frequency in the three months following the initial intervention
4. Long-term AT Attitude: 10-point scale measuring willingness to use AT services in the follow-up survey
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Our primary outcomes track both stated and revealed preferences for AT adoption across three distinct time horizons. Immediate preferences are measured through a 10-point willingness-to-use scale collected directly after the information intervention in Stage 1, providing a baseline measure of the intervention's immediate impact on stated preferences. Short-term adoption is measured through actual coupon redemption behavior during the one-month validity period, offering our first revealed preference measure. Long-term engagement is tracked through APP usage data provided by our platform partner, including both APP access frequency and completed rides over the three-month post-intervention period. Finally, the long-term attitude measure from our follow-up survey enables us to compare changes in stated preferences over time.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
1. Economic Perception: Five-category measure of perceived price differences between ATs and traditional taxis
2. Labor Impact Perception: Five-category measure of expected driver displacement rate
3. Safety Perception: Five-category measure of expected change in accident rates
4. Environmental Impact Perception: Five-category measure of expected change in PM2.5 emissions
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Our secondary outcomes examine the mechanisms through which information interventions affect AT adoption decisions. All measures are collected in the follow-up survey using multiple-choice questions with precisely defined categories:
1. Economic Perception measures expected price differences:
Categories range from "More than 50% cheaper" to "More than 50% more expensive".

2. Labor Impact Perception assesses expected employment effects:
Categories range from "No impact" to "Will replace over 75% of drivers".

3. Safety Perception captures expected changes in accident rates:
Categories range from "60-90% reduction" to "60-90% increase".

4. Environmental Impact Perception measures expected pollution effects:
Categories range from "20-30% reduction" to "30-40% increase" in PM2.5.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We conduct a randomized field experiment examining consumer adoption of autonomous taxis (ATs) in Wuhan, China. We recruit 1,200 participants from high-traffic urban locations and randomly assign them to four treatment groups. Each participant completes a baseline survey, receives randomly assigned information about ATs, and is given a promotional coupon for one free AT ride. We then track both their short-term coupon usage and long-term app engagement. A follow-up survey is conducted after the coupon expiration to measure sustained attitudes and behaviors.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization is implemented through a built-in computerized randomization algorithm in our survey platform. When a participant begins the survey, the platform automatically assigns them to one of the four treatment groups based on a pre-set randomization sequence. This ensures immediate and unbiased treatment assignment during field implementation.
Randomization Unit
The unit of randomization is the individual participant. Each person who agrees to participate in our study is independently randomized into one of the four treatment conditions: Control, Positive Information, Negative Information, or Combined Information. All treatments are administered at the individual level, and there is no clustering or group-level randomization in our design. This individual-level randomization maximizes statistical power and allows us to control for location-specific fixed effects in our analysis.
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
Not applicable - our design uses individual-level randomization without clustering.
Sample size: planned number of observations
1,200 individual participants from urban areas in Wuhan.
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Control Group (T1): 300 participants
Positive Information (T2): 300 participants
Negative Information (T3): 300 participants
Combined Information (T4): 300 participants
Total: 1,200 participants
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
With 300 participants per treatment arm (1,200 total), assuming 80% power and 5% significance level, we can detect, across treatments: Immediate preferences: 0.46 point difference on 10-point scale. Short-term adoption: 10.7 percentage point difference in coupon usage. Long-term engagement: 0.77 ride difference in monthly usage. Long-term attitudes: 0.56 point difference on 10-point scale. These calculations account for differential attrition across time periods (0% immediate, 5% short-term, 20% long-term) and assume independent observations without clustering.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Center of Behavioral and Experimental Research at Wuhan University
IRB Approval Date
2024-12-01
IRB Approval Number
EM240046