Field
Trial Status
|
Before
in_development
|
After
completed
|
Field
Abstract
|
Before
This experiment is an attempt to understand how urban noise experienced by people in the developing world affects worker productivity, cognitive function, and decision-making. Participants will be recruited to attend a short training course at the Technology Development Centre (TDC) of the Kenyan National Industrial Training Authority. During each of the training sessions, participants will be randomly assigned to produce a practice good in one of two rooms. Then one of the rooms will have noise added using equipment on-site at the TDC. Worker productivity and cognitive performance will be measured during each session, and workers will engage in real-stakes decisions at the end of selected days. Finally, at the end of the training period, participants' willingness to pay for quiet will be elicited.
|
After
This experiment is an attempt to understand how urban noise experienced by people in the developing world affects worker productivity, cognitive function, and decision-making. Participants will be recruited to attend a short training course at the Technology Development Centre (TDC) of the Kenyan National Industrial Training Authority. During each of the training sessions, participants will be randomly assigned to produce a practice good in one of two rooms. Then one of the rooms will have noise added using equipment on-site at the TDC. Worker productivity and cognitive performance will be measured during each session, and workers will engage in real-stakes decisions at the end of selected days. Finally, at the end of the training period, participants' willingness to pay for quiet will be elicited.
An additional second experiment was conducted following the design of the first, but using only cognitive assessments and an effort task as the outcomes of interest.
|
Field
Last Published
|
Before
September 16, 2016 03:28 AM
|
After
January 11, 2018 02:01 PM
|
Field
Study Withdrawn
|
Before
|
After
No
|
Field
Intervention Completion Date
|
Before
|
After
July 31, 2017
|
Field
Data Collection Complete
|
Before
|
After
Yes
|
Field
Final Sample Size: Number of Clusters (Unit of Randomization)
|
Before
|
After
144 room-sessions in the first experiment and 88 room-sessions in the second experiment.
|
Field
Was attrition correlated with treatment status?
|
Before
|
After
No
|
Field
Final Sample Size: Total Number of Observations
|
Before
|
After
128 individuals in 144 room-sessions in the first experiment and 220 individuals in 88 room-sessions in the second experiment.
|
Field
Final Sample Size (or Number of Clusters) by Treatment Arms
|
Before
|
After
72 room-sessions in the first experiment per treatment arm and 44 room-sessions in the second experiment per treatment arm.
|
Field
Data Collection Completion Date
|
Before
|
After
July 31, 2017
|
Field
Intervention (Public)
|
Before
Participants will be randomly assigned to work in either a quiet room or a noisy room while producing a practice good during training sessions at the TDC.
|
After
Participants will be randomly assigned to work in either a quiet room or a noisy room while producing a practice good during training sessions at the TDC in the first experiment.
In the second experiment, participants will be randomly assigned to work in either a quiet room or a noisy room while taking a battery of cognitive assessments.
|
Field
Primary Outcomes (End Points)
|
Before
Productivity in producing the practice good, performance on three cognitive tests, decisions made in three real stakes decision tasks, and willingness to pay for quiet.
|
After
Productivity in producing the practice good, performance on cognitive tests, decisions made in three real stakes decision tasks, and willingness to pay for quiet.
|
Field
Experimental Design (Public)
|
Before
Approximately 130 participants will be recruited to participate in two-week training courses at the TDC over 4 rounds. During each of the training sessions, workers will be randomly assigned to either practice in noise or in quiet. Noise will be generated using equipment at the TDC. The participants' productivity in producing the practice good and cognitive performance will be measured during each session. At the end of several days, participants will be presented with real stakes decisions. Finally, at the end of the training period, participants' willingness to pay to practice in the quiet room will be elicited.
|
After
Approximately 130 participants will be recruited to participate in two-week training courses at the TDC over 4 rounds. During each of the training sessions, workers will be randomly assigned to either practice in noise or in quiet. Noise will be generated using equipment at the TDC. The participants' productivity in producing the practice good and cognitive performance will be measured during each session. At the end of several days, participants will be presented with real stakes decisions. Finally, at the end of the training period, participants' willingness to pay to practice in the quiet room will be elicited.
In the second experiment, approximately 220 participants were recruited to participate in a two-day evaluation in rooms near the TDC. During each session workers were randomly assigned to take the assessments in either noise or quiet. Noise was generated with the same type of engine as in the first experiment. Workers had the opportunity to pay for quiet working conditions on the second day.
|
Field
Planned Number of Clusters
|
Before
144 room-sessions (2 rooms observed over 72 sessions)
|
After
144 room-sessions (2 rooms observed over 72 sessions) in the first experiment
88 room-sessions (2 rooms observed over 44 sessions) in the second experiment
|
Field
Planned Number of Observations
|
Before
Approximately 130 individuals observed over 18 training sessions.
|
After
Approximately 130 individuals observed over 18 training sessions in the first experiment. Approximately 220 individuals observed over 4 sessions in the second experiment.
|
Field
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
|
Before
130 individuals observed approximately 9 sessions in treatment and 9 sessions in control each.
|
After
130 individuals observed approximately 9 sessions in treatment and 9 sessions in control each for the first experiment, and 220 individuals observed approximately 2 sessions in treatment and 2 sessions in control each for the second experiment.
|