Fostering Social-Media Entrepreneurs: Evidence from A Field Experiment in China

Last registered on December 16, 2024

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Fostering Social-Media Entrepreneurs: Evidence from A Field Experiment in China
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0015005
Initial registration date
December 10, 2024

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
December 16, 2024, 2:00 PM EST

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation

Other Primary Investigator(s)

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2022-02-01
End date
2025-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
We conduct a field experiment in China to incentivize small business owners to become social media content creators. Our primary subsidy is provided as a social media advertisement subsidy for content boosting fees, directly given to the social media platform. This subsidy is conditional upon business owners creating new video, live stream, or photo posts to promote their business. We intend to study the outcomes of revenue, profit and the number of employees after the intervention. We compare the effects with a direct cash transfer. Additionally, we also study whether increased sales enhance small businesses’ likelihood of opening online stores and subsequently accessing fintech credit.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Lu, Fangzhou. 2024. "Fostering Social-Media Entrepreneurs: Evidence from A Field Experiment in China." AEA RCT Registry. December 16. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.15005-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Our experiment provides the treatment group with a subsidy of 1,000 RMB as a social media advertisement fee, such as the Dou+ services on TikTok. Social media services like Dou+ are designed to boost the reach and visibility of user-generated content on the TikTok platform by allowing content creators to pay for increased expo- sure. Essentially, more people are likely to see the business’s video, streaming, or photo in their feed. This practice is also commonly observed across other social media platforms, where content creators leverage paid promotional tools to enhance user engagement and, consequently, their economic prospects. By providing households and small businesses with access to social media promotion services comparable to paid marketing services, we can eval- uate the potential economic benefits and behavioral shifts resulting from increased online presence and exposure. According to TikTok’s official website, one RMB of Dou+ reaches between 25 to 50 new viewers. Therefore, our 1,000 RMB subsidy allows small businesses to reach between 25,000 and 50,000 new views. Social media promoters on other platforms have a similar customer reach. This treatment is offered only on the condition that business owners create a new video, live stream, or photo post to promote their business. In the experiment, our control group receives nothing. We also design a direct cash transfer of the same amount, unconditional, to serve as an alternative control group.

In summary, The Treatment group received a social media content booster fee of 1000 RMB, the Control group received no intervention, and the Cash Transfer group received a direct cash transfer of 1000 RMB.
Intervention Start Date
2023-01-01
Intervention End Date
2025-12-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
business revenue, profit, and employee growth. The entrepreneurs' social media behavior after intervention
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
We randomize 5,000 small businesses in the provinces of Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Liaoning, China between control and treatment groups. Randomization of treatment and control groups was done by stratifying businesses by sector and region.The re-randomization method was used to ensure balance on key baseline characteristics, including entrepreneur age, gender, years of schooling, business age, total asset value, and business revenue. The re-randomization method involves repeatedly randomizing until a desirable balance on covariates is achieved. Specifically, we first allocated small businesses to the treatment and control groups on the basis of a randomly generated number. Using this allocation, we then calculated the maximum and the average t-statistics on the differences in averages across the treatment and control groups for the following variables: Entrepreneur age, gender, years of schooling, business age, total asset value, business revenue/sales, If the maximum t-statistic for these variables was higher than 1.25 or the average t-statistic was higher than 0.35, we drew a new random number and allocated firms to the treatment and control groups on the basis of this new number. We repeated this process until the maximum t-statistic was 1.25 or lower and the average t-statistic was 0.35 or lower.

The randomization method adopted pairs businesses together based on the minimum distance between their baseline characteristics and randomly assigns them to treatment and control. Data is collected on a total of 5,000 small businesses – 1000 of whom have received the treatment intervention.

Baseline business surveys are administered to the treatment and control businesses before the intervention. Regular follow-ups are conducted via telephonic surveys to capture business performance metrics such as revenue, profit, and employee numbers. This is further cross-checked with the administrative data collected from social media platforms and fintech lenders. A midline survey is conducted one year post-intervention, and an endline survey is conducted two years and three years post-intervention.

The treatment group receives a social media advertisement subsidy of 1,000 RMB for content boosting fees, directly given to the social media platform, conditional upon business owners creating new video, live stream, or photo posts to promote their business. The control group receives no intervention.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
randomization done by a computer in public. We use the Stata code automatically to re-randomized as follows. We first allocated small businesses to the treatment and control groups on the basis of a randomly generated number. Using this allocation, we then calculated the maximum and the average t-statistics on the differences in averages across the treatment and control groups for the following variables: Entrepreneur age, gender, years of schooling, business age, total asset value, business revenue/sales, If the maximum t-statistic for these variables was higher than 1.25 or the average t-statistic was higher than 0.35, we drew a new random number and allocated firms to the treatment and control groups on the basis of this new number. We repeated this process until the maximum t-statistic was 1.25 or lower and the average t-statistic was 0.35 or lower.
Randomization Unit
individuals (entrepreneurs)
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
5000 individuals (entrepreneurs)
Sample size: planned number of observations
5000 individuals (entrepreneurs)
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
1000 individuals (entrepreneurs) for social-media treatment, 1000 individuals (entrepreneurs) for cash treatment, 3000 for the control group
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
IRB Approval Date
IRB Approval Number